Redskins
- Thread starter The 5 solas
- Start date
Said the fellow who just said he isn't considering what I'm saying.
lain:Anyone who could attempt to say that this:
if you find yourself offending people you don't mean to you should seriously consider not doing that.
constitutes telling others what to do should get credits toward a creative writing concentration/major.
lain: Or, it's an operation of logic predicated on the assumption that people mean what they say when they say the don't mean to offend. Or it's a way of letting people illustrate what they really mean, one way or another.
I'm not speaking to people who aren't doing anything...except for you, of course.
Last edited:
that's not fair
if you don't accept that he's winning on points, how will we all know that he's won?
and it's really really really important to him to think that he's won :darwinsm:
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
I can tell. But he has the respect of one of the anti-religionists who's an engineer, so there's that for him, I guess.
I don't need a "win". All I need is God's Rhema and to know exactly what's going down on the world stage to sculpt hearts and minds according to the spirit of antichrist.
Let the Beast roar.
I have an informed opinion based on consideration before the court case happened. With no surprise, the holding offered the same wrong-headed reasoning.
So if I understand you correctly, you are not calling for the Redskins to change their name?
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
If only the rest of your contributions were like that...
Of course you do. You're an "Other". :thumb:
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
They aren't alleged points, unlike your acumen.
Empty rhetoric from someone who hasn't demonstrably grasped them or responded. Anyone can jeer from the cheap seats.
Anyone who could attempt to say that this:
if you find yourself offending people you don't mean to you should seriously consider not doing that.
constitutes telling others what to do should get credits toward a creative writing concentration/major.
Or, it's an operation of logic predicated on the assumption that people mean what they say when they say the don't mean to offend. Or it's a way of letting people illustrate what they really mean, one way or another.
I'm not speaking to people who aren't doing anything...except for you, of course.
I'm still not taking the bait. There's no need to discuss your alleged "points". They're all irrelevant. The low-context truth is fathoms upon fathoms beneath all you think or say from your flaming tower of high-context concepts.
:wave2::wave:
:freak:
nobody ever changes their mind
except for that one time artie exchanged his for a turnip
it was an improvement :thumb:
nobody ever changes their mind
except for that one time artie exchanged his for a turnip
it was an improvement :thumb:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What a high context conceptual point you made there.
It almost reminds me of embracing the fallacy of the consequent...
lain:
A curious way to note an inability to do more than shake an empty sleeve from behind a repetition of unsupported nonsense and an unwillingness to engage on any substantive point. But I think I understand you. You simply aren't prepared to step out from behind those rehearsed phrases and expose the chasm they cover.
Good on you.
There's no need to post at all, as you ably demonstrate by posting nothing much repeatedly.
He declares without proof and from comfortably outside of the ring.
Yes, you've already all but burned that bulb out. Perhaps you could pull your texts together and find a new phrase or two for the next non engagement/pronouncement.
Silly fellow.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
What a high context conceptual point you made there.
It almost reminds me of embracing the fallacy of the consequent...
What a hack at pretending to know what high-context means.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
A curious way to note an inability to do more than shake an empty sleeve from behind a repetition of unsupported nonsense and an unwillingness to engage on any substantive point. But I think I understand you. You simply aren't prepared to step out from behind those rehearsed phrases and expose the chasm they cover.
Good on you.
There's no need to post at all, as you ably demonstrate by posting nothing much repeatedly.
He declares without proof and from comfortably outside of the ring.
Yes, you've already all but burned that bulb out. Perhaps you could pull your texts together and find a new phrase or two for the next non engagement/pronouncement.
Silly fellow.
Well... At least you seem like you might be a reasonably nice guy.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Washington Redskins!!!!!!!!
When I can be. But I have a difficult time suffering undergraduates.
Where?
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Given how you tediously go on about it and decline actual debate in favour of using the damn phrase as if it's a point of some significance, it merely underlines how much of a pretentious clod you actually are frankly. You're not here to discuss or engage, you're simply here to laud your own ego, or so it would appear up to now. Plenty of folk are pissed off with your pomposity though I don't suppose that will give you any pause for thought...
:darwinsm:
right up there with "stamp foot and declare a bad thing" :darwinsm:
:mock:town, the prissy girlie-man
when artie starts whining about "a real debate" or "a debate on points", you know he's been hitting the sauce :chuckle:
I think you're right.
One of my takeaways? People will go to great lengths to justify being offensive, or a jerk, or just a wretch in general--far greater lengths than anyone really thinks.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Yeah, that puffed-up gnosis is a cruel master. I'll be down here at the low-context foundation of love abounding in epignosis as your soar by in that hot air balloon of high-context gnosis.
Where?
(In Christmas commercial voice... "They're everywhere. They're everywhere.")
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
I've actually explained the problem with English programming of thought via its high-context structure. It just almost has to be done in live teaching. Apart from that, it's all me watching others soar by overhead in puffed-up gnosis while presuming I'm the one who's puffed-up.
Without exception and within the first hour of live teaching, everyone begins to realize exactly what I'm referring to. You and others have no idea how your thought and belief systems are passively patterned and hypnotically initiated and perpetuated at the language level. And it began gestationally in the womb, continuing to the present.
If you knew and understood this, you'd be much more upset about being violated and molested in your mind and heart by language structure, and much less upset at what you've alleged is my pomposity, etc.
If you weren't so conceptually driven by your own mind and will, you could clearly see how Satan's primary devices are directed at the logos (intelligent and rational reasoning with expression) of man.
That's one of the main ways mankind is in the image of God, and it's by His own Logos that all was created; with the Rhema of His power upholding all things.