Executing homosexuals

genuineoriginal

New member
Nonbelievers would not get their backs up at public displays of religion were it not for the hidden message that devout Christians are somehow superior to others, and that everyone else is morally inferior and therefore not deserving of the same rights as Christians.
Well, you are morally inferior, as proven by your desire to allow mothers to hire strangers to murder their children.

you assume that nonbelievers similarly wish to forcefully impose their views onto you. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Are you really so much stupider than a moron that you cannot see how the homosexual lovers have imposed their views on society?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
The fact you're declaring victory after asking an irrelevant question exposes your failure and dishonesty.

I asked the question in order to show how obvious cruelty and barbarism actually is. :doh:


Those things are obvious. Executing criminals for crimes against nature is neither barbaric, nor an atrocity.

Well of course they are, which is why most people find the notion of killing people for homosexuality and adultery barbaric.

That's not why, imbecile. It's not that simple, but you don't actually care; so why are you even here?

It isn't? Oh, well please do explain how complicated it is then. :think:

And are you really going to complain about a typo?

Complain? I was only doing what you so often do LH. Correcting typos and highlighting mistakes. What's your problem? :idunno:

All you've countered is straw men. You've done nothing but lie about my ideal. And I'm not going to repeat myself about the difference between my ideal and Big Brother.

Just keep lying, like the scum you are.

I've done no such thing, so pick your toys back up and quit sulking. You endorse the DP for practicing homosexuals and adulterers, so where's the lie?

Why would I even care?

Then don't.

No, you twit. I thought your comment was irrelevant because I had already said as much in different words, but you still felt it necessary to tell me as though I didn't already know.

Once again nope. I was stating my position regardless of whatever opinion you might have had on a vote. That was it so your repeated nonsense only reflects back on you goofball.

Genius? Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm well aware my IQ is average.

Not much cop at recognizing sarcasm are ya?

And I limit my vocabulary so the idiots understand it.

Are you talking about aCW?

Yeah, in high school. Not a society I would impose on anyone. But you're still too stupid to understand how criminalizing homosexuality doesn't equate to invasions of privacy.

Then you're naive beyond words.

As usual you miss the point.

It's hard to find one with plenty of your posts...
 
Well, you are morally inferior, as proven by your desire to allow mothers to hire strangers to murder their children.


Deuteronomy 21:18-21

If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.


Your book. (Actually not, MY book - my people - though you are the one who would actually arrogate to impose it on others).

You would allow parents to have their already born children killed for disobedience; even if it never actually happened you would still have the possibility be there.

One also does not have the right to connect themselves to another's bloodstream and draw off nutrients and pump out their waste products, without the consent of the other person. If the other person does not wish for the first to be connected to their circulatory system in that way, then they should have the right to sever the connection, and if inside their body, to remove them. (Though something tells me that a law that said that the process of removing the fetus from the mother's womb must not directly kill the fetus, though if it dies immediately afterward because it could not survive outside of the womb then no crime has been committed, still would not sit well with the so-called "pro-life" crowd).


Are you really so much stupider than a moron that you cannot see how the homosexual lovers have imposed their views on society?

The only "imposition" I see is demanding to be treated with dignity and respect as befits them as human beings and demanding equal rights and protections under the law. You still have not answered my question as to how one is harmed by coming into contact with a homosexual. Likely because you do not have an answer, because there isn't one. (I have also never had a gay person ever try to "convert" me or even so much as try to hit on me.)

But it seems that all you can do is resort to petty insults when called out on your ignorance, arrogance and hypocrisy.
 

genuineoriginal

New member

Deuteronomy 21:18-21

If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.


Your book. (Actually not, MY book - my people - though you are the one who would actually arrogate to impose it on others).
So, you are admitting that you are one of the children of disobedience that brought God's wrath on yourself through the very things you are promoting on this site?

Ephesians 5:3-6
3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.​

You still have not answered my question as to how one is harmed by coming into contact with a homosexual.
After seeing the Diaspora and what happened to the children of Israel because of their filthiness, you dare to ask how anyone is harmed by encouraging people to act on their sexual perversions?

Yes, I am very familiar with how your people brought down the wrath of God on themselves through sexual immorality.
The only reason God did not destroy your people (like He did to Sodom and Gomorrah) is because He intends to keep His promise to Abraham.
 
So, you are admitting that you are one of the children of disobedience that brought God's wrath on yourself through the very things you are promoting on this site?

Ephesians 5:3-6
3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
4 Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.​


After seeing the Diaspora and what happened to the children of Israel because of their filthiness, you dare to ask how anyone is harmed by encouraging people to act on their sexual perversions?

Yes, I am very familiar with how your people brought down the wrath of God on themselves through sexual immorality.
The only reason God did not destroy your people (like He did to Sodom and Gomorrah) is because He intends to keep His promise to Abraham.

The only filthiness I see is coming from you. You steal our book, add to it, arrogantly decide that your interpretation carries more weight than ours when it was never your book to begin with, and then accuse us of filthiness for not sharing your utterly repugnant and barbaric views on morality? Have you truly no shame at all?

The more I think about it, the more I believe that much of what ended up in the Tanakh (what Christians and people like you refer to as the "Old Testament") was written as some sort of joke. A bunch of us got together in whatever the equivalent of a bar was back then, and came up with all that stuff just for laughs (probably after getting drunk), and never in a million years would they have expected anyone to actually take that stuff seriously. Given that us Jews seem to excel in comedy, and a disproportionate number of comedians are Jewish, it would not be completely beyond the realm of possibility.

Now, if you will excuse me, I am off to get wasted. While I am at it, I will be sure to praise Dionysus as well.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
You steal our book, add to it, arrogantly decide that your interpretation carries more weight than ours when it was never your book to begin with, and then accuse us of filthiness for not sharing your utterly repugnant and barbaric views on morality?
The prophecies in the Bible that say the children of Israel will be scattered among all the nations for refusing to obey the commandments.

The Diaspora is proof that the prophecies have come true.

And now you are still refusing to obey the commandments.

Wasn't the destruction of Jerusalem twice enough for you?
Wasn't the holocaust enough for you?

Why are you trying to provoke God into more wrath against the children of Israel.
Haven't they had enough?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
The prophecies in the Bible that say the children of Israel will be scattered among all the nations for refusing to obey the commandments.

The Diaspora is proof that the prophecies have come true.

And now you are still refusing to obey the commandments.

Wasn't the destruction of Jerusalem twice enough for you?
Wasn't the holocaust enough for you?

Why are you trying to provoke God into more wrath against the children of Israel.
Haven't they had enough?

Wow. Way to bring the subject of the Holocaust into this GO. As if the horrendous atrocities perpetrated on men, women and children have anything to do with this.

You really are one completely obnoxious pratt.

:down:
 

genuineoriginal

New member
Way to bring the subject of the Holocaust into this GO. As if the horrendous atrocities perpetrated on men, women and children have anything to do with this.
The Diaspora was prophesied in the Bible as God's punishment on the children of Israel for their refusal to keep the commandments.
The Holocaust happened to the Jews because they were in the Diaspora.

It is simple logic, but you are so blinkered that you can't see it.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
The Diaspora was prophesied in the Bible as God's punishment on the children of Israel for their refusal to keep the commandments.
The Holocaust happened to the Jews because they were in the Diaspora.

It is simple logic, but you are so blinkered that you can't see it.

So all the men, women and children who were butchered during the war, in concentration camps were being 'punished' were they?

Moron.
 

Doormat

New member
Wasn't the destruction of Jerusalem twice enough for you?
Wasn't the holocaust enough for you?

More children die in the United States from abortion. Has God blessed or cursed America?

Why are you trying to provoke God into more wrath against the children of Israel.
Haven't they had enough?

You're implying the poster is the cause of God's wrath against other people. Is that what you believe?
 
More children die in the United States from abortion. Has God blessed or cursed America?

You could argue that he has cursed us with idiot politicians :plain:

Who among other things keep trying to ram through new laws restricting access to legal and safe abortions, instead of trying to implement policies that would actually have an effect of reducing the number of abortions in this country. Like maybe they could implement policies that would ensure that pregnant women have access to affordable prenatal care, instead of passing laws that make suffering a miscarriage subject to a criminal investigation.


You're implying the poster is the cause of God's wrath against other people. Is that what you believe?

You look at all these things like natural disasters and such being immediately followed by mentally defective clowns like Pat Robertson bleating about "God's wrath", and all I can think about it is, God must have pretty bad aim. We got tornadoes in "tornado alley" - red states. Wildfires hitting red states (though also blue and what are often referred to as "purple" states). Hurricanes striking the gulf coast - also red states. Hurricane Sandy hit New York City, one of the bluest cities in the country, and made a huge mess but we recovered quickly enough, where as Katrina absolutely ravaged New Orleans (and killed far more people). Interestingly enough, the portions of New Orleans that sustained the least amount of damage were among the most "sinful" parts of the city! So I figure that if I do such things like get completely drunk and watch porn that if God gets angry he'll smite a fundie instead :D.

No, I do not believe that any of these disasters are in any way a result of "God's wrath". Hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc., are all naturally occurring events. Wildfires can be caused by natural events (like lightning striking a dead tree and setting it on fire) or by human stupidity (some idiot leaving a campfire burning unattended). No god had any hand in any of them.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
So all the men, women and children who were butchered during the war, in concentration camps were being 'punished' were they?
The children of Israel were scattered into the nations.
The punishment was exile from the land.

What godless men did to the children of Israel during their punishment was an atrocity.

You really should stop having knee jerk reactions, moron.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
The children of Israel were scattered into the nations.
The punishment was exile from the land.

What godless men did to the children of Israel during their punishment was an atrocity.

You really should stop having knee jerk reactions, moron.

You're the one claiming that the holocaust was a punishment you total pratt.
 
Top