it's exhausting work
chrysostom’s 2013 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
And responded. And responded. And instigated ... and so on.
Way to break the irony meter, Eeset. Since when do YOU not join the gang attacks on TH?
I guess that's different if it happens to be against someone you hate such as TH ...
What a hypocrite you continue to be.
okay so you didn't get the whiner award
you still have a shot at the meanest
you still have a shot at the meanest
still open for more nominations
Which? Reported posts inside the year...Sod by a large margin.
Average posts per day....Sod x two or three or more.
Posts inside this thread...Sod, you then me.
Person you really, really dislike...son of a gun.
It's as plain as the nose lying by your feet. Me.
By which case she means I pointed out how horrifically questionable her judgment is and that she used terms like "Abuser" and "gang rape" to describe internet activity, sure.
Anna only "dodged" the lame "Do you still cheat at taxes?" sort of question.
So you're saying you got the information second hand.
lain:So her choices are: yes I approve/town's a bully; or no, I don't approve/Town's a bully.
Meanest TOL member? I'd say you for starting a thread that's a rough parallel for how Sod uses religion, but given it's your thread and that parallel, what are the odds?
So her choices are: yes I approve/town's a bully; or no, I don't approve/Town's a bully.
Oh Fearless Leader ... what would you have us do?
Hard to say. The boo(hoo) coalition or cotillion wants you to harken back to the days before I arrived, when it was all sunshine and puppies rolling around in clover...at least for people like aCW, Sod, SD, chrys, Eeset, Christ's Word, etc.
I say, hang around and wait on an award or two.
lain: Though just being nominated is an honor in its own right, if I can use that word in conjunction (either)...like being on Nixon's enemies list.A win for all sides.
here is a good example of why it is my job to group people
Seemed appropriate given that's what this thread is all about, grouping people. Every nomination for a faux award is exactly that.
So you're really saying that you are why it's your job.
lain:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
"No intention?" Sorry, but I'm pretty sure you would've found a way to bring it up again on your own.
And why wouldn't he? Shouldn't someone falsely accused of rape be able to defend himself? Believe it or not, I expected the "she asked for it" to come up and was going to preempt that last night but I was too tired to write any more. You keep bringing this back to sexual assault and you can't compare the two situations, because they're not comparable, which again is my whole point. In fact the comparison is ludicrous. It's pretty simple, really... this is the way life works: if you poke and poke and poke at someone, please don't expect most people to share your surprise that the subject of your poking responds.
Regarding team neg-repping... remember when you said you'd been voted out of the Women's Club and about four of us said we knew nothing of any vote? Well, you can apply that to this situation. I don't think a team of women came around and negged you because TH issued a call. There's a certain tendency by some to think the whole forum is watching a particular thread or poster and really, they're not, they're all busy in their own threads thinking everyone is watching them. And all joking aside (because the joking is in response to another silly allegation) there's not a bevy of "viragos" sitting around waiting for the red phone to ring, regardless of how you - or sod - likes to paint things.
So you're really saying that you are why it's your job.
can you rephrase that for those like me who are not so clever
I'll go slowly.
You noted my list of several hostile posters.
You said "here is a good example of why it is my job to group people"
I noted that since all I did was mirror your thread's point (grouping people ) you were really saying that you are the reason you have to group people.
Or as much of the reason as anyone you might object to.
But it was funnier the first time.
lain:She stopped someone from responding? Else, it's a forum where that's what people do, chime in on the comments by other people.
I think you were looking for the blog section...before there was one.
I'll go slowly.
You noted my list of several hostile posters.
You said "here is a good example of why it is my job to group people"
I noted that since all I did was mirror your thread's point (grouping people ) you were really saying that you are the reason you have to group people.
Or as much of the reason as anyone you might object to.
But it was funnier the first time.
you didn't use the right smiley
how was I supposed to know it was funny?
You can't go by visual cues around here. There's one poster who darn near punctuates his every attempt at it with a :rotfl:
Ask someone with a sense of humor.
lain:
Ask someone with a sense of humor.
I keep looking for common sense
and
that is not funny
for meanest?
oh chrys, it simply has to be you for all those mean posts you made about zoo
but I am not mad
Is the Whiner winner whining about winning the Whiner award?