:yawn:
Right. I care about civil rights because you're under the impression it's nothing more than trendy.
Who Here Chose To Be Heterosexual?
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
:yawn:
Right. I care about civil rights because you're under the impression it's nothing more than trendy.
Anyone who uses the analogy's a complete and utter idiot. More tea, vicar?
Amen.
genuineoriginal
New member
It is your failure to understand the aptness of the analogy that is prompting the projection of your shortcomings onto others.
An idiot and a stuffed shirt.:chuckle:
I understand why you guys keep trotting out this old chestnut. I also understand what you think it accomplishes or means. But you've never understood how ridiculous and completely out of whack with reality it actually is. You use the bestiality argument like some logic-bombing trump card that's supposed to end or satisfy a discussion. It doesn't. It's just clueless and idiotic.
genuineoriginal
New member
What are you again?
It is supposed to get you to think about where your argument fails, but clueless and idiotic people cannot grasp that simple fact.
:angel: I thought you were a bloviating buffoon. I stand corrected.
It is supposed to get you to think about where your argument fails, but clueless and idiotic people cannot grasp that simple fact.
You'll never convince Granite that there's something wiser than himself. 
genuineoriginal
New member
You'll never convince Granite that there's something wiser than himself.
Oh, a wise guy, eh?
Woo-woo- woo-woo!
alwight
New member
Wonderful response Delmar :BRAVO:, your capacity for reason and rationality knows no beginning it seems.
Comparing consensual sexual activity to non-consensual activity is a total non-sequitar. It makes as much sense as saying we need to beef up spear manufacturing because apes use crude tools in the wild. Bestiality and homosexuality have absolutely nothing in common. (Having to keep on spelling that out for opponents of gay rights gets boring and pretty painful, but whatcha gonna do.)
However: Since Christianity considers the majority of human sexual behavior to be sinful and aberrant, the comparison does work if you don't make any distinctions between any sexual behavior that takes place outside of marriage. In that sense, operating under the assumption that "non-married sex is bad," bestiality and homosexuality essentially are the same, or may lead to one another, only because any sexual activity outside of wedlock is lumped under the blanket definition of "sin." Distinguishing different varieties of human sexuality simply doesn't matter to folks like yourself. It's all "bad" and thus easily compared and dismissable. But that's simply what happens when bad thinking lives in a bubble.
alwight
New member
Unless you know any talking donkeys then bestiality is not exactly consensual.Why exactly is beastiality so wrong? If you mate with enough mares, you might sire a centaur. Right? If it was good enough for Caligula, it is good enough for anyone.
genuineoriginal
New member
Homosexuality is as much of an aberrant fetish as bestiality. Wrapping it in the argument of "consentual sex" only means two or more people have agreed to get together to practice their abberant fetishes.
Well this just proves and makes my point.
Congratulations!
You've won on the internet!
How about you just take your trophy and go away?
You've won on the internet!
How about you just take your trophy and go away?
genuineoriginal
New member
I see your point. I bet it makes it hard to find a hat that fits.
I doubt it.:chuckle:
And if you actually do, deliberately ignoring it just to comfort your own prejudice makes you a conscious bigot, not just one who was raised and warped. That's far worse.
In another homosexual thread, Arthur Brain made reference to himself being a heterosexual EIGHT TIMES in the same post.
I was curious how many times he'd try to convince himself (and others) that he isn't a practicing homosexual nor has homosexual desires.
Only seven Arthur, keep trying, perhaps someday you'll believe it.
I was curious how many times he'd try to convince himself (and others) that he isn't a practicing homosexual nor has homosexual desires.
Well, you won't have always been attracted to him, you'd have had to meet him first...
I certainly couldn't "choose" to walk away from heterosexuality. It's as wired in me as my abhorrence for peanut butter....
Only seven Arthur, keep trying, perhaps someday you'll believe it.
annabenedetti: spending every waking moment attempting to justify homosexual behavior.