alwight
New member
You have no interest in extant people and their extant lives, they have no value against a potential person?
I really don’t know how I can be clearer since you haven’t disputed the facts or that damage to the CNS corresponds in damage to the person. Clearly from a natural perspective and unspiritual POV anyway there really is no reason to think it could be otherwise imo, what specifically do you think is incorrect here, I presume you do?
Sorry LH but if you can’t explain why and how the person exists beyond the CNS then I see no reason to alter my thinking.
Where else then, explain? I need to know in what other form of existence you think a person in this physical realm exists other than within a CNS. If it exists outside of the body altogether say, then how exactly does an abortion (a physical event) harm a “person”?
Why be so coy about where else you think the “person” is, or don’t you have any idea?
What about erring on the side of an extant woman rather than a potential person?
You seem to think here that my brains are indeed my “person” to which I agree, I rest my case.
Do you need physical evidence of a CNS or what exactly? If you don’t dispute anything specific I’ve said about a CNS then how can you complain that there is no evidence?
Do you accept that the CNS exists in fact and functions at least as though the “person” is contained within it unless it stops? Do you require some kind of actual physical evidence of this? What exactly?
Clearly I don’t think so, have you any evidence of this?
I don’t advocate killing any living human being unless living might be the worse option.
Brains in this case = my “person”, I rest my case again.
You are entitled to your opinion too, but not to impose it on others.
I have no idea what a rapist’s choice has to do with anything here, but you would compel a woman to gestate the rapist’s zygote and give birth, I think that is inconsiderate of her needs and needlessly cruel to her.
When it concerns other people than you, who honestly don’t accept your beliefs hold any water at all and who don’t want their own lives and future lives governed by your beliefs, then yes indeed.
I don’t have to, I already accept that every “person” is probably unique.
One minute you claim to care deeply for the “person” so cruelly deprived of life by abortion and then you say something like this, and apparently then don’t mind that iyo most zygote “person” are doomed to fail, well before I at least think an actual person actually could even exist, hypocrite!
Godbot.
Good so I don’t need to provide evidence of this then?
Does a “person” get diminished by loss of body parts other than the CNS?
Anyway unlike you, yes I do think a brain dead previously living talking person has gone and no longer exists, anywhere else for that matter.
