User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 55 of 55

Thread: The Mueller Report is in. No further indictments.

  1. #46
    TOL Legend The Barbarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    10,278
    Thanks
    253
    Thanked 3,404 Times in 2,308 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    417219
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    But nothing on collusion with Russia.
    You did know, that there is no statute for "collusion", right? There is however, one for conspiracy, which is where it's going, now.

    It appears that the initial impression that Mueller didn't indict for federal crimes also punishable under state law, was to avoid any claims of double jeopardy, was correct.

    And New York, among possible others, has everything relevant from Mueller.
    This message is hidden because ...

  2. #47
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    26,235
    Thanks
    4,628
    Thanked 10,198 Times in 7,581 Posts

    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147795
    Hope dies hard for the insane leftist

  3. #48
    Toxic Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    19,332
    Thanks
    570
    Thanked 13,333 Times in 9,306 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147856
    Quote Originally Posted by The Barbarian View Post
    You did know, that there is no statute for "collusion", right? There is however, one for conspiracy, which is where it's going, now.

    It appears that the initial impression that Mueller didn't indict for federal crimes also punishable under state law, was to avoid any claims of double jeopardy, was correct.

    And New York, among possible others, has everything relevant from Mueller.


    Desperate Barbarian.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  4. #49
    Over 3000 post club
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,505
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,661 Times in 1,241 Posts

    Blog Entries
    13
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    354191
    The Mueller Report is in. No further indictments.

    In June 2018 Barr submitted a 17 page unsolicited criticism of the Mueller Investigation, which in itself should disqualify him from the role as serving as the nation's sole conduit when it comes to interpreting the Report!

    Jeff Sessions would never have been replaced by this President, unless he had wanted an Attorney General who was prepared to follow his "marching orders" when it came to the release of the Mueller Report!
    Last edited by jgarden; March 28th, 2019 at 07:05 PM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jgarden For Your Post:

    Rusha (March 28th, 2019)

  6. #50
    TOL Legend Jerry Shugart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    San Luis Potosi,Mexico
    Posts
    14,009
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 8,758 Times in 5,751 Posts

    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147843
    Quote Originally Posted by jgarden View Post
    The Mueller Report is in. No further indictments.

    In June 2018 Barr submitted a 17 page unsolicited criticism of the Mueller Investigation, which in itself should disqualify him from the role as serving as the nation's sole conduit when it comes to interpreting the Report!
    So according to you anyone who expresses his opinion under the First Amendment is disqualified from serving as AG!

    You have no respect for the First Amendment but that doesn't come as a surprise because the Dems these days think that the US Constitution is outdated.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Shugart For Your Post:

    Aimiel (March 29th, 2019),lifeisgood (March 28th, 2019)

  8. #51
    TOL Legend Jerry Shugart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    San Luis Potosi,Mexico
    Posts
    14,009
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 8,758 Times in 5,751 Posts

    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147843
    Quote Originally Posted by The Barbarian View Post
    There is however, one for conspiracy, which is where it's going, now.
    Attorney General Bill Barr quoted the Muller report:

    "As the report states: '[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.' "

    Muller's report concerning the facts of the investigation will be searched in vain for any evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...er-report.html

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Shugart For Your Post:

    Aimiel (March 29th, 2019),lifeisgood (March 28th, 2019),TrumpTrainCA (April 21st, 2019)

  10. #52
    Over 3000 post club
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,505
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,661 Times in 1,241 Posts

    Blog Entries
    13
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    354191
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    So according to you anyone who expresses his opinion under the First Amendment is disqualified from serving as AG!

    You have no respect for the First Amendment but that doesn't come as a surprise because the Dems these days think that the US Constitution is outdated.
    Barr can express his 1st Amendment Rights to is heart's content, but many also interpreted it as a self-serving audition to show this President that here was a candidate for Attorney General who was sympathetic to Trump's opposition to the Mueller Investigation!

    Once Barr made his opposition to the Mueller Investigation public, he lost all credibility that he could serve as an impartial, unbiased interpreter of he Report's contents.

    Jeff Sessions was replaced for 1 and only 1 reason - by following DOJ guidelines he had chosen to do the honorable thing and recuse himself, while this President was only interested in an Attorney General whose primary qualification was a willingness to protect the White House from Mueller!

    Given that "Shugart" would be first in line to denounce a Democratic president for committing "Executive overreach" if he/she were to arbitrarily attempt to circumvent the role of Congress by invoking a "national emergency," his lecture concerning the US Constitution is hypocritical at best!

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to jgarden For Your Post:

    Rusha (March 28th, 2019)

  12. #53
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 175 Times in 135 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jgarden View Post
    Barr can express his 1st Amendment Rights to is heart's content, but many also interpreted it as a self-serving audition to show this President that here was a candidate for Attorney General who was sympathetic to Trump's opposition to the Mueller Investigation!

    Once Barr made his opposition to the Mueller Investigation public, he lost all credibility that he could serve as an impartial, unbiased interpreter of he Report's contents.

    Jeff Sessions was replaced for 1 and only 1 reason - by following DOJ guidelines he had chosen to do the honorable thing and recuse himself, while this President was only interested in an Attorney General whose primary qualification was a willingness to protect the White House from Mueller!

    Given that "Shugart" would be first in line to denounce a Democratic president for committing "Executive overreach" if he/she were to arbitrarily attempt to circumvent the role of Congress by invoking a "national emergency," his lecture concerning the US Constitution is hypocritical at best!

    Thread Title: The Mueller Report is in. No further indictments.

    Your post: Gobbldeygook

  13. #54
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 175 Times in 135 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

  14. #55
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 175 Times in 135 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us