User Tag List

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 83

Thread: Dispensationalism

  1. #31
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    15,665
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,869 Times in 2,892 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    1249369
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacob View Post
    Is it Christians from Jews? And, is this right?

    Interesting. What difference in plans, and even for Jews who believe in Jesus?

    Interesting. I am a Jew and a Christian and an ex-Dispensationalist.
    If you were an Ex-Dispensationalist, you would not only know that GO is wrong about all that, but you would not have to ask someone who is wrong about all that (GO) to explain it.

    It is repeatedly clear in your every post that you never understood Dispensationalism.

    Dispensationalism is a Bible Based Bible Study Principle.

    In other words, it is basically a way to study the Bible that the first reply I posted on here - about what God said to Israel when He separated them from all other Nations - shows that the Dispensational Bible Study APPROACH is based on Scripture.

    All it is, is noticing and RESPECTING BOTH those KEY things in Scripture that DIFFER from one another, and those that are THE SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Another VERY SIMPLE example...

    Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

    3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

    Now we know...and...But now...are not the same...they differ from one another.

    One was before...the other.

    Dispensationalism is this simple.

    Here is another example, based on the above, Bible Based Principle...

    Luke 22:35 And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. 22:36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

    That is describing AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN things that NOW DIFFERED from how things had been BEFORE.

    Here is another one that that IMPORTANT DISTINCTION in Luke 23:36 was actually about...

    Luke 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. 4:20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. 4:21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

    Now, notice where He stopped in Isaiah itself...

    Isaiah 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; 61:2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;

    He stopped reading at the first half of Isaiah 61: 2.

    Why?

    Because the part about "and the day of vengeance of our God" is NOT about His First Advent, but about His Return in vengeance.

    The Lord HIMSELF RESPECTED DISTINCTIONS in Scripture BETWEEN KEY things that DIFFER and those that are the SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Now, where do you think 22:36's "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one" belongs?

    Within Luke 4:21's "this day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears" (His First Advent), OR within that part in Isaiah AFTER where He stopped reading Isaiah in Luke 4 - the part in Isaiah 61: 2 that says "and the day of vengeance of our God" (about His return in vengeance)?

    He HIMSELF had told them - just over three years earlier - which part of those two Advents Luke 22:36 is a part of.

    He'd told them when He first chose them and sent them out to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

    Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 10:6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 10:7 And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. 10:8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. 10:9 Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, 10:10 Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat.

    Matthew 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. 10:17 But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 10:18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. 10:19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. 10:20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you. 10:21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved. 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.

    THIS is BIBLE Based Dispensational Bible Study - the study and RESPECT of, BOTH those KEY things in Scripture that DIFFER from one another, and those that are THE SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Til you at least attempt to study the Bible according to the above for a good year, or so - as so obviously practiced by the Lord Himself - you haven't ANY business neither saying you're an Ex-Dispensationalist, nor concluding that Dispensationalism is not a Bible Based Study Approach.

    Acts 17: 11, 12 (you might do well to memorize these two verses in Acts 17, and then seek to consistently apply their three-fold principle).

  2. #32
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    that is it...that is the new covenant...what He observed and taught...

    it’s NOT what goes into a man that makes him unclean...it is the fact that he already IS unclean for even allowing something unclean into his mouth...

    Like a tattoo...

    You aren’t made unclean when the needle pierces the skin...you are unclean for even thinking to get a tattoo planning what to get, where on your body, and by who to get it from, when, how much,...all of it...by the time the inking starts you are long unclean...




    Thus nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him “unclean” where “unclean” means having an unclean heart. Eating unclean bread does not make a man’s heart unclean. Instead, the Master points out that unclean bread “entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats” (Mark 7:19 KJV). That is to say, it passes through the digestive system and goes out the end opposite from whence it came in. This is the plain meaning of the passage.

    Yet some translators take the clause “purging all meats” as a narrator’s parenthetical statement and translate “purging” as “Thus He declared all foods clean.” The words “Thus He declared,” however, are not in the Greek text. They are supplied by the translator to make the new construction of the sentence fit. The Greek text literally says, “purging all foods.” Jesus was not setting aside the Law; He was talking about (ahem) “going potty.”

    http://www.sabbathreformation.com/ar...-63892046.html
    So God's Law still is? What about unclean animals in Peter's vision? What about animal sacrifice?

  3. #33
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by binyamin7 View Post
    The Scripture is absolutely clear- you are wise in your own opinion if you believe in replacement theology- Romans 11:25-26.
    Good Scripture!

  4. #34
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    If you were an Ex-Dispensationalist, you would not only know that GO is wrong about all that, but you would not have to ask someone who is wrong about all that (GO) to explain it.

    It is repeatedly clear in your every post that you never understood Dispensationalism.

    Dispensationalism is a Bible Based Bible Study Principle.

    In other words, it is basically a way to study the Bible that the first reply I posted on here - about what God said to Israel when He separated them from all other Nations - shows that the Dispensational Bible Study APPROACH is based on Scripture.

    All it is, is noticing and RESPECTING BOTH those KEY things in Scripture that DIFFER from one another, and those that are THE SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Another VERY SIMPLE example...

    Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

    3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

    Now we know...and...But now...are not the same...they differ from one another.

    One was before...the other.

    Dispensationalism is this simple.

    Here is another example, based on the above, Bible Based Principle...

    Luke 22:35 And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. 22:36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

    That is describing AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN things that NOW DIFFERED from how things had been BEFORE.

    Here is another one that that IMPORTANT DISTINCTION in Luke 23:36 was actually about...

    Luke 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, 4:19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. 4:20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him. 4:21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

    Now, notice where He stopped in Isaiah itself...

    Isaiah 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; 61:2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;

    He stopped reading at the first half of Isaiah 61: 2.

    Why?

    Because the part about "and the day of vengeance of our God" is NOT about His First Advent, but about His Return in vengeance.

    The Lord HIMSELF RESPECTED DISTINCTIONS in Scripture BETWEEN KEY things that DIFFER and those that are the SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Now, where do you think 22:36's "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one" belongs?

    Within Luke 4:21's "this day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears" (His First Advent), OR within that part in Isaiah AFTER where He stopped reading Isaiah in Luke 4 - the part in Isaiah 61: 2 that says "and the day of vengeance of our God" (about His return in vengeance)?

    He HIMSELF had told them - just over three years earlier - which part of those two Advents Luke 22:36 is a part of.

    He'd told them when He first chose them and sent them out to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

    Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 10:6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 10:7 And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. 10:8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. 10:9 Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, 10:10 Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat.

    Matthew 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. 10:17 But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; 10:18 And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. 10:19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. 10:20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you. 10:21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved. 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.

    THIS is BIBLE Based Dispensational Bible Study - the study and RESPECT of, BOTH those KEY things in Scripture that DIFFER from one another, and those that are THE SAME within a TIMELINE.

    Til you at least attempt to study the Bible according to the above for a good year, or so - as so obviously practiced by the Lord Himself - you haven't ANY business neither saying you're an Ex-Dispensationalist, nor concluding that Dispensationalism is not a Bible Based Study Approach.

    Acts 17: 11, 12 (you might do well to memorize these two verses in Acts 17, and then seek to consistently apply their three-fold principle).
    Interesting. I follow what you have said here, having heard some of it before. But I do not accept it. I believe that you have split up the scripture into time periods unnecessary.

  5. #35
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,697
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 467 Times in 428 Posts

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3677
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacob View Post
    So God's Law still is?
    yes

    What about unclean animals in Peter's vision?
    Peter explained his vision not once but twice that it was about taking the gospel to goyim formerly considered unclean by jews...still considered unclean by jews today...it was about bringing goyim into Israel...NOT judaism...

    Just as it was when the church was in the wilderness...ONE LAW for native and goyim within their gates...goyim were brought into Israel NOT the tribe of Judah...as His house is a house of prayer for ALL nations...no monopoly there...

    Israel was a promise from above never about genetic blood lines...His people are of faith and obedience...worshipping in spirit and truth



    What about animal sacrifice?
    Yah is satisfied...His wrath passes over until the end...our lips and lives our good works are pleasing sacrifices...sacrifices NEVER saved...were meant to teach Mercy rather than sacrifice...and NOW He teaches us that...

  6. #36
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    15,665
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,869 Times in 2,892 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    1249369
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacob View Post
    Interesting. I follow what you have said here, having heard some of it before. But I do not accept it. I believe that you have split up the scripture into time periods unnecessary.
    If you say so.

    For I never said anything about time periods.

    That is what you read into my words, out of your decided blindness, given your obviously willed failure to have at least applied first, that three-fold principle implied in Acts 17: 11, 12, to what I wrote.

    More examples of a Timeline running throughout Scripture...

    Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

    John 3:28 Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him.

    John 3:30 He must increase, but I must decrease.

    Mark 1:14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 1:15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

    Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

    Even the demons that that land was then so heavily polluted with (due to Israel's wholesale rebellion, etc.), understood this concept that you in your willful ignorance would oppose...

    Matthew 8:28 And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way. 8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?

    Here are two individuals who got things on Scripture's ever obvious Timeline...wrong.

    2 Timothy 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 2:17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

    Here is another mention of this concept...

    Hebrews 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    1 - at sundry times, and in diverse manners, in time past;;

    2 - Hath in these last days spoken.

    Those two divisions of time are not the same.

    Here is another mention - of a yet future one...

    Hebrews 2:5's "the world to come..."

    1 Corinthians 14:38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

    Acts 17: 11, 12.

  7. #37
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    yes

    Peter explained his vision not once but twice that it was about taking the gospel to goyim formerly considered unclean by jews...still considered unclean by jews today...it was about bringing goyim into Israel...NOT judaism...

    Just as it was when the church was in the wilderness...ONE LAW for native and goyim within their gates...goyim were brought into Israel NOT the tribe of Judah...as His house is a house of prayer for ALL nations...no monopoly there...

    Israel was a promise from above never about genetic blood lines...His people are of faith and obedience...worshipping in spirit and truth



    Yah is satisfied...His wrath passes over until the end...our lips and lives our good works are pleasing sacrifices...sacrifices NEVER saved...were meant to teach Mercy rather than sacrifice...and NOW He teaches us that...
    Then what may I ask has been abolished, annulled, made obsolete?

  8. #38
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    If you say so.

    For I never said anything about time periods.

    That is what you read into my words, out of your decided blindness, given your obviously willed failure to have at least applied first, that three-fold principle implied in Acts 17: 11, 12, to what I wrote.

    More examples of a Timeline running throughout Scripture...

    Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

    John 3:28 Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him.

    John 3:30 He must increase, but I must decrease.

    Mark 1:14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 1:15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.

    Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

    Even the demons that that land was then so heavily polluted with (due to Israel's wholesale rebellion, etc.), understood this concept that you in your willful ignorance would oppose...

    Matthew 8:28 And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way. 8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?

    Here are two individuals who got things on Scripture's ever obvious Timeline...wrong.

    2 Timothy 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 2:17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

    Here is another mention of this concept...

    Hebrews 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    1 - at sundry times, and in diverse manners, in time past;;

    2 - Hath in these last days spoken.

    Those two divisions of time are not the same.

    Here is another mention - of a yet future one...

    Hebrews 2:5's "the world to come..."

    1 Corinthians 14:38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

    Acts 17: 11, 12.
    Please excuse my ignorance of the words you would use. You mentioned the days of vengeance, and your Bible Study Method has you believing something. I said time periods.

    I do not know what you are trying to tell me now.

  9. #39
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    18,135
    Thanks
    401
    Thanked 11,738 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147838
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    Most christians reject Sabbath was made for man...but was just for jews...or was abolished...

    It was jewish false witness to slander Stephen and Paul that accused that they were teaching Yahushua destroyed the law.
    Can you name names instead of making broad generalisations? For example, I am a Christian, but I don't deny that the Sabbath was made for man or believe that Jesus overturned the law.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (January 11th, 2019)

  11. #40
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,697
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 467 Times in 428 Posts

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3677
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacob View Post
    Then what may I ask has been abolished, annulled, made obsolete?
    The old covenant with “blood” Israel...which by second temple times was mainly/only consisted of jews...the rest of the tribes were gone...but ONLY AFTER having been a mighty nation a peoples like the sand of the sea...thus His side of the contract was indeed fulfilled THEY WERE A MIGHTY NATION...and yet the jews made NO effort to be a blessing to the other Nations...or allowing goyim into their fellowship...and well finally even killed their husband thus death did them part...and freeing themselves of that covenant...

    His “it is finished” at the cross was His teaching and demonstrating the “new covenant” which was now WITH HIM and happily again to WHOSOEVER believeth because Yah so loved the WORLD and not just jews...

    What else was abolished was the curse of not being restored to Yah and HIS WAYS...but now THROUGH HIM that restoration was possible...but only through His new agreement He demonstrated and taught and SEALED with His death...NO CHANGES...

    Now ALL can through the Son be fully restored to Him the Father and His WAY and to what it would have been like before the detour of sin...

    Is why we are to practice being MORE LIKE HIM less like the fallen world...to get ready for eternal life with HIM...

    Animal sacrifices and the shedding blood its symbol of DEATH was no longer needed as Yah was finally pleased and satisfied and now His people are covered again by innocent blood that of His only begotten Son...those that believed and obeyed covered themselves in that blood and will be PASSED OVER again...that final judgement...

    That of course pleases Him so He of course says “well done good and faithful servent enter in to your reward”

    So the debt or bill was paid for {abolished} but the OT prices remain...the Law its ministration of death pointing out sin....we have a NEW HIGH PRIEST a new PAYOR and a way to pay...

    So the need for blood, temple, levitical priests, all obsolete...but the temple was just a divine stage an opera of righteousness...a theatre of teaching of holiness...and it has show times...these show times remain as reminders of Him HIS WAYS...that calendar HE MADE remains and we benefit from celebrating these show times of divine appointments...yearly AND WEEKLY...

    So the calendar and the Law remains as they are ETERNAL...but the contract with “blood” israel is obsolete...the new Israel is very much like His first wife...His taste in woman doesnt change...ha

    hope that helps a bit...

  12. #41
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,697
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 467 Times in 428 Posts

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3677
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    Can you name names instead of making broad generalisations? For example, I am a Christian, but I don't deny that the Sabbath was made for man or believe that Jesus overturned the law.
    Name names? You mean of posters here on TOL or name Christian denominations who consider Sabbath an abolished OT relic or if really MAD not ever having applied to them...?

    Since you dont believe the jewish false witness that He overturned the law do you “keep the seventh day Sabbath”?

    How about the other 4 requirements...including only eating clean meat...as killing a swine properly and draining its blood does NOT make it kosher to eat...ya dig?

    Do you not let anyone judge your sabbath or festival keeping but the body of Christ?

    Really dont mean to be speaking so generally but I rarely find 10/10 believers here...

    usually it is 9/10s which robs Him of worship so that’s 8/10s...and then they even claim He abolished the Sabbath so thats 7/10s as that is a LIE...and a lawless god is a different counterfeit false god...so 6/10s...

  13. #42
    TOL Legend Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lakewood, Washington
    Posts
    17,593
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked 826 Times in 761 Posts

    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    121116
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    The old covenant with “blood” Israel...which by second temple times was mainly/only consisted of jews...the rest of the tribes were gone...but ONLY AFTER having been a mighty nation a peoples like the sand of the sea...thus His side of the contract was indeed fulfilled THEY WERE A MIGHTY NATION...and yet the jews made NO effort to be a blessing to the other Nations...or allowing goyim into their fellowship...and well finally even killed their husband thus death did them part...and freeing themselves of that covenant...

    His “it is finished” at the cross was His teaching and demonstrating the “new covenant” which was now WITH HIM and happily again to WHOSOEVER believeth because Yah so loved the WORLD and not just jews...

    What else was abolished was the curse of not being restored to Yah and HIS WAYS...but now THROUGH HIM that restoration was possible...but only through His new agreement He demonstrated and taught and SEALED with His death...NO CHANGES...

    Now ALL can through the Son be fully restored to Him the Father and His WAY and to what it would have been like before the detour of sin...

    Is why we are to practice being MORE LIKE HIM less like the fallen world...to get ready for eternal life with HIM...

    Animal sacrifices and the shedding blood its symbol of DEATH was no longer needed as Yah was finally pleased and satisfied and now His people are covered again by innocent blood that of His only begotten Son...those that believed and obeyed covered themselves in that blood and will be PASSED OVER again...that final judgement...

    That of course pleases Him so He of course says “well done good and faithful servent enter in to your reward”

    So the debt or bill was paid for {abolished} but the OT prices remain...the Law its ministration of death pointing out sin....we have a NEW HIGH PRIEST a new PAYOR and a way to pay...

    So the need for blood, temple, levitical priests, all obsolete...but the temple was just a divine stage an opera of righteousness...a theatre of teaching of holiness...and it has show times...these show times remain as reminders of Him HIS WAYS...that calendar HE MADE remains and we benefit from celebrating these show times of divine appointments...yearly AND WEEKLY...

    So the calendar and the Law remains as they are ETERNAL...but the contract with “blood” israel is obsolete...the new Israel is very much like His first wife...His taste in woman doesnt change...ha

    hope that helps a bit...
    Actually, if you know of the Law you can share it. If you have no regard for the Law you might be trying to make up a debt. Why did Paul say that he died to the Law through the Law?

    Galatians 2:19 NASB - "For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God.
    Bereishit - Genesis - Chapter 1

    1 In the beginning of God's creation of the heavens and the earth.
    :א בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ

    In beginning He created God the heavens and the earth

  14. #43
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    18,135
    Thanks
    401
    Thanked 11,738 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147838
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    Name names? You mean of posters here on TOL?
    That's who you're talking to.

    Since you dont believe the jewish false witness that He overturned the law do you “keep the seventh day Sabbath”?
    No.

    Is that the law in your country?
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (January 11th, 2019)

  16. #44
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,697
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 467 Times in 428 Posts

    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3677
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    That's who you're talking to.

    No.

    Is that the law in your country?
    Nope...live in a country where we give unto Caesar what is Caesars and to Yah what is Yah’s...

    Sadly though that freedom to worship is going to be reduced...Alabama recently voted to put the 10 commandments on all state properties...the irony as they keep 9/10 of it...if that

    And as the world collapses or climate change increases I imagine man will all turn back to God and seek to worship Him...their traditional ways...

    That will also be legislated through laws...we already have Sunday blue law designed to keep it “holy”

    There is precedence:

    https://youtu.be/dt4LIzjoZqg

    But why if you dont believe the Sabbath was overturned do you not keep it?

  17. #45
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    18,135
    Thanks
    401
    Thanked 11,738 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147838
    Quote Originally Posted by clefty View Post
    Nope.
    So what's the problem then?

    But why if you dont believe the Sabbath was overturned do you not keep it?
    I'm not Jewish.

    As ... climate change increases.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (January 11th, 2019)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us