User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: If Kavanaugh Is Partisan, Ruth Buzzy Ginsbag Needs to go Too

  1. #1
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,142
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 698 Times in 579 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Arrow If Kavanaugh Is Partisan, Ruth Buzzy Ginsbag Needs to go Too


    If Kavanaugh Is ‘Partisan,’ Should We Impeach Justice RBG?

    http://www.larryelder.com/column/if-...h-justice-rbg/

    Forcefully responding to allegations of sex assault, Judge Brett Kavanaugh said in his confirmation hearing rebuttal, “This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit — fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.”

    This set off a brand-new argument against Kavanaugh, as his foes began proclaiming that he lacked the appropriate “judicial temperament” to join the Supreme Court.

    Apparently, during the last 12 years as a judge on the country’s second-most important court, Kavanaugh’s judicial temperament was never a problem. Liberal pundits professed “shock” at Kavanaugh’s “angry outburst.” Is there something called, “The Playbook on Proper Demeanor When Accused Without Corroboration of Attempted Rape”? At stake was not just Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, but his entire livelihood. If, due to uncorroborated allegations of sexual assault, he had lost the confirmation, how could someone so tainted go back to work Monday morning as an appellate judge of the D.C. circuit court?

    Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said: “I’ve changed my views (on Kavanaugh) for reasons that have no really relationship to his intellectual ability or his record as a federal judge. He’s a fine federal judge. … I think that his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind. … He has demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities, and I think there’s merit in that criticism. … It’s not healthy to get a new justice that can only do a part-time job. … There are enough people who’ve been put in categories for which he would be unable to sit as a judge.”

    Approximately 2,400 law professors signed a letter, published in The New York Times, which argued that Kavanaugh’s “intemperate, inflammatory and partial manner” rendered him unsuitable to become a Supreme Court justice. The professors said: “We have differing views about the other qualifications of Judge Kavanaugh. But we are united, as professors of law and scholars of judicial institutions, in believing that he did not display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on the highest court of our land.”

    As to what Kavanaugh’s so-called conspiratorial view says about his fitness for public service, does this concern extend to presidential candidates? Consider this infamous conspiratorial accusation: “The great story here, for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it,” then-first lady Hillary Clinton said in 1998, “is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.” As a presidential candidate in 2015, Clinton said, “The NRA’s position reminds me of negotiating with the Iranians or the communists.” To Democrats, Clinton’s “conspiratorial world view” did not render her unacceptable as president.

    To those who say Kavanaugh disqualified himself as an “impartial jurist,” consider the “judicial temperament” of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a heroic figure to the left. In a July 2016 interview with The New York Times, Ginsburg said of candidate Donald Trump: “I can’t imagine what the country would be with Donald Trump as our president” and that her late husband would have said it was “time for us to move to New Zealand.”

    Undaunted, Ginsburg later told CNN she considered Trump a “faker,” adding: “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”

    How’s that for bias, judicial temperament and a blatant disregard for the expectation of impartiality? Ginsburg later apologized: “On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised, and I regret making them. Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future, I will be more circumspect.”

    Kanavaugh apologized, too. In an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal days before his confirmation, Kavanuagh writes: “At times, my testimony — both in my opening statement and in response to questions — reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused, without corroboration, of horrible conduct completely contrary to my record and character. My statement and answers also reflected my deep distress at the unfairness of how this allegation has been handled.

    “I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said. I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband and dad. I testified with five people foremost in my mind: my mom, my dad, my wife, and most of all my daughters.”

    Liberals see no basis for Ginsburg to recuse herself from cases involving Trump, despite her partisan attack. Will they extend Kavanaugh the same courtesy?

  2. #2
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    20,258
    Thanks
    1,852
    Thanked 5,213 Times in 3,869 Posts

    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147724
    Stevens is worried that kavanaugh might be biased against those who tried to smear him with false accusations?


    Liberals see no basis for Ginsburg to recuse herself from cases involving Trump, despite her partisan attack
    Liberals are retards

  3. #3
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,142
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 698 Times in 579 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ok doser View Post
    ......Liberals are retards
    Stupid AND evil, a dangerous combination

  4. #4
    Censorship is the height of vanity Rusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    13,070
    Thanks
    19,189
    Thanked 4,587 Times in 2,620 Posts

    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147747
    Should Ginsburg ever throw the type of partisan tantrum that will now be Kavanaugh's legacy, then YES, she should go.
    As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes."
    When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics."
    When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty
    -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.
    - ABRAHAM LINCOLN, letter to Joshua F. Speed, August 22, 1855





  5. #5
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,770
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,015 Times in 657 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    366616
    Katholic Krusader, it's Bader, not Buzzy.

  6. #6
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    20,258
    Thanks
    1,852
    Thanked 5,213 Times in 3,869 Posts

    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147724
    google ruth buzzy

    she was the inspiration for emily litella



    better google emily litella too

  7. #7
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,142
    Thanks
    430
    Thanked 698 Times in 579 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonahdog View Post
    Katholic Krusader, it's Bader, not Buzzy.
    Unbelievable.

  8. #8
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,770
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,015 Times in 657 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    366616
    Quote Originally Posted by CatholicCrusader View Post
    Unbelievable.
    No, KK, it really is. Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us