User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: Limited atonement destroyed

  1. #46
    ☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) ☜☜☜☜☞☞☞☞ A Calvinist! ☜☜☜☜☜ Ask Mr. Religion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona USA
    Posts
    6,708
    Thanks
    4,419
    Thanked 3,873 Times in 2,211 Posts

    Blog Entries
    148
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)



    Rep Power
    2147690
    Quote Originally Posted by 7djengo7 View Post
    Of course I didn't read the whole sermon! I merely read the portion that I quoted, because that was interesting.
    If this is how you operate, why would anyone be obliged to interact with your declarations? It is a fool's errand.

    AMR
    Embedded links in my posts or in my sig below are included for a reason. Tolle Lege.



    Do you confess?
    Founder, Reformed Theology Institute
    AMR's Randomata Blog
    Learn Reformed Doctrine
    I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
    Christian, catholic, Calvinist, confessional, Presbyterian (PCA).
    Lex orandi, lex credenda: everyone is a Calvinist on their knees.
    The best TOL Social Group: here.
    If your username appears in blue and you have over 500 posts:
    Why?



  2. #47
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
    If this is how you operate, why would anyone be obliged to interact with your declarations? It is a fool's errand.

    AMR
    Hey, do what you want, Professor. You're obviously not obligated to answer any of my questions, which is lucky for you, since you are forced to stonewall against them. If you aren't interested in trying to defend your irrational ideology from rational objections, then, by all means, continue to do as you've been doing, and hedge yourself from them. Trying to defend Calvinism is, indeed, a fool's errand. It's not like anyone else is going to read this thread, where they would see that you have done nothing in its cause--unless you consider getting "thanked" and high-fived by nobody but other pretentious Calvinist bots is a mark of success in the cause of Calvinism.

  3. #48
    Over 1000 post club
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    1,390
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked 159 Times in 135 Posts

    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 7djengo7 View Post
    Hey, do what you want, Professor. You're obviously not obligated to answer any of my questions, which is lucky for you, since you are forced to stonewall against them. If you aren't interested in trying to defend your irrational ideology from rational objections, then, by all means, continue to do as you've been doing, and hedge yourself from them. Trying to defend Calvinism is, indeed, a fool's errand. It's not like anyone else is going to read this thread, where they would see that you have done nothing in its cause--unless you consider getting "thanked" and high-fived by nobody but other pretentious Calvinist bots is a mark of success in the cause of Calvinism.
    Wait, what!? You think you are thinking rationally? Again, you make me laugh out loud.
    Time to give it up, jengo, you are in way over your head.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us