User Tag List

Page 37 of 40 FirstFirst ... 2734353637383940 LastLast
Results 541 to 555 of 593

Thread: Omniscience means fatalism.

  1. #541
    Over 3000 post club Rosenritter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,885
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 1,087 Posts

    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    203298
    Quote Originally Posted by Clete View Post
    "If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” - Romans 10:8b-13)

    If you get this one thing right, whatever else you get wrong cannot overcome the blood of Christ. You may make it "by the skin of your teeth" as Job described his escape from his enemies or, as Paul put it in I Corinthians, "as if by fire" but that's better than the alternative.

    ...
    I strongly suspect, however, that most of the people who call themselves Calvinist believe it the exact same way that you and I believe it and they make no attempt to reconcile it with the doctrine of immutability or with any other Calvinist doctrine. They believe it and, as compartmentalized as it may be away from the rest of their doctrine, that belief is, in my view, an acceptance of the gospel.

    Clete
    I agree with GM's assessment, that is a good post. I think it is important to remember that we should look to one's fruits, especially if we disagree over specific doctrine or theory.

    Mat 13:28-30 KJV
    (28) He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
    (29) But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
    (30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

    To mix this with another parable, doesn't it matter far more what we become than were we started, whether the seed takes root and produces fruit a hundredfold, rather than what type of ground that seed managed to grow within? We don't have the right or wisdom to ultimately judge wheat from tares now. And even most especially from the Open perspective, where we understand that God himself has withheld judgment until the end.

  2. #542
    TOL Subscriber Grosnick Marowbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    34,046
    Thanks
    16,890
    Thanked 32,939 Times in 22,217 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147906
    The Calvinist, in sharing the Gospel with the unsaved, would 'dare not' add their particular doctrine about Election and predestination into the mix. That would tend to bring about confusion and lack of certainty within the heart and mind of the listener. However, wouldn't it be somewhat 'hypocritical' for the Calvinist to leave those beliefs out of the conversation since they cling to those supposed truths?

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Grosnick Marowbe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (September 14th, 2018),Right Divider (September 14th, 2018)

  4. #543
    TOL Subscriber Grosnick Marowbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    34,046
    Thanks
    16,890
    Thanked 32,939 Times in 22,217 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147906
    Is there any Calvinist that started out as a believer in the 'Gospel of the grace of God' (what Paul preached) and became a Calvinist at some point thereafter? On the other hand, is there any 'Grace believer' that eventually turned to Calvinism?

  5. #544
    TOL Legend Arthur Brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
    Posts
    14,612
    Thanks
    8,804
    Thanked 6,962 Times in 4,619 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147745
    Quote Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
    Election is Scriptural, so we cannot avoid or deny the term. There are only two kinds of people in the world, the believers and the non-believers. The believers are the elect of God, no matter what view one holds about how exactly election works itself out. Those that do not call upon the name of the Lord will be damned to eternal punishment. These are the reprobate (2 Peter 2:9).

    What makes you think my previous discussion with you on the matter has changed? A refresher...

    http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post4813451
    http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post4813460
    http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post4813465
    http://theologyonline.com/showthread...=1#post4813748

    It is a core teaching of Scripture which makes it plain that only those so granted faith by God will be saved. This is true for the Calvinist and non-Calvinist alike.

    Who are the one's so granted faith? All those that call upon the name of the Lord. It matters not whether we speak of the elect or the non-elect, for we do not know whom they may be. So why try to operate as if we know the secret will of God? We know our duty. Do it. Not a single person can claim he could not do his duty because he felt some compulsion by God, some coercion of his own volitional will. This is manifest nonsense dealing with hypotheticals in some vain attempt to be able to claim some mitigation for one's non-belief.

    What we do know is our duty: call upon the name of the Lord and be saved. Do that, versus trying to argue, "Well I could not do that, since I was reprobated." How exactly could anyone actually know what is the determinate will of God concerning one's eternal destiny? No one knows the unrevealed will of God (Deut. 29:29). Fortunately, God has revealed all that we need to know and do when it comes to matters concerning our eternal destiny.

    AMR
    If there's actually a loving creator behind life then the notion that one created such with the express intention of consigning part of it to an eternity of suffering by design makes no sense given the Biblical definition of love. It's not just Calvinism that makes no sense in that regard to be fair.
    Well this is fun isn't it?


  6. #545
    TOL Legend Lon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    9,474
    Thanks
    2,556
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 2,712 Posts

    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147722
    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    We both realize that our interpretation of certain Scripture verses will NEVER coincide.
    Disagree. God gets to make this call. 1 John 3:2 True is true and we both will indeed hold to it lest our faith is in vain. There is no way I can 'agree to disagree forever. Even in this life, God can certainly win out with either you or I. How stubborn do either of us have to be? God can bust down pride and make what He wants to come about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    So, if it's all the same to you, I'd rather avoid this sort of debate.
    Understood. You are allowed to pick and choose what you want to discuss and who you want to do so with

    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    I'll do this, pick one of those verses you posted and give YOUR interpretation, and I'll give my own interpretation. Okay?
    Thank you. John 6:37-40; 17:2
    My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
    Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
    Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
    Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
    No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
    Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

    Is Calvinism okay? Yep

    Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

    1Co 13:11 ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

    Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

  7. #546
    TOL Legend Lon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    9,474
    Thanks
    2,556
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 2,712 Posts

    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147722
    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    Is there any Calvinist that started out as a believer in the 'Gospel of the grace of God' (what Paul preached) and became a Calvinist at some point thereafter? On the other hand, is there any 'Grace believer' that eventually turned to Calvinism?
    Yes.
    My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
    Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
    Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
    Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
    No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
    Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

    Is Calvinism okay? Yep

    Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

    1Co 13:11 ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

    Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

  8. #547
    TOL Legend Lon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    9,474
    Thanks
    2,556
    Thanked 4,562 Times in 2,712 Posts

    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147722
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    Exo 4:21 KJV
    (21) And the LORD said unto Moses, When thou goest to return into Egypt, see that thou do all those wonders before Pharaoh, which I have put in thine hand: but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go.

    I believe (note that I limit this word to believe) God will not harden anyone's heart in a south direction that wasn't there already. God didn't have to harden Pharaoh's heart initially; it was after Egypt was receiving divine smack-down and any sane ruler would have relented, not out of love or understanding but simply acknowledgment of brute force. But three times it repeats that God was to harden that heart, and for the reason to stop him from letting Israel go ahead of the schedule. Without that specific intervention Israel would have been let go sooner.
    Grace can turn or harden. Christ's sacrifice either hardens or softens. The 'act' doesn't change, the heart changes, such that even Grace to Pharaoh in the manner of warning and plagues, came across as hard to him and hardened him whereas the same equivalent to Nineveh turned them and softened them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    My understanding has no problem with names being assigned to people. God only need to direct the mind of the parent to the proper name, either subconscious (which would be hard to prove) or even in the direct obvious sense as in John ("... and wrote, saying, His name is John.", Luke 1:63).
    Omniscience neither. God told David what would happen exactly 'if' he did one action. David did the opposite. To me, omniscience makes the better sense of scripture and it is said already, He is "all knowing." Prognosis means literally "knows before."
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    Were you willing to let God direct you? I don't think it takes much argument that throwing a select bible verse in front of someone is not normally expected to have any sort of effect. If God had to manifest himself or an angel in front of you and force your action against your heart and you still resist, the sin remains in your mind, even if the action was never completed.
    Doesn't matter. Jonah wasn't willing. Saul wasn't willing. God 'makes' one willing. Yes, God made me willing too.



    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    God can direct the naming of a child, he can shape events to place the child in the right circumstances, and if required he can force the action to complete the prophecy. King Saul is an example where God had to step in to actually stop Saul from taking action. Is it not written, "Is Saul also among the prophets?"

    1Sa 19:18-24 KJV
    (18) So David fled, and escaped, and came to Samuel to Ramah, and told him all that Saul had done to him. And he and Samuel went and dwelt in Naioth.
    (19) And it was told Saul, saying, Behold, David is at Naioth in Ramah.
    (20) And Saul sent messengers to take David: and when they saw the company of the prophets prophesying, and Samuel standing as appointed over them, the Spirit of God was upon the messengers of Saul, and they also prophesied.
    (21) And when it was told Saul, he sent other messengers, and they prophesied likewise. And Saul sent messengers again the third time, and they prophesied also.
    (22) Then went he also to Ramah, and came to a great well that is in Sechu: and he asked and said, Where are Samuel and David? And one said, Behold, they be at Naioth in Ramah.
    (23) And he went thither to Naioth in Ramah: and the Spirit of God was upon him also, and he went on, and prophesied, until he came to Naioth in Ramah.
    (24) And he stripped off his clothes also, and prophesied before Samuel in like manner, and lay down naked all that day and all that night. Wherefore they say, Is Saul also among the prophets?

    It is/was a question. Moreover, it ended a question. That means they always questioned it. Agree?





    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    I refuse to dismiss any term that is from the Bible text. I don't think Calvinism has a right concept of election, which goes back to the "outside of time" theory of reality. As touching that point, what I was trying to show here is that (at least so far that I have seen) any and every recorded miracle works within the power of God and by the power of God, rather than requiring "foreknowledge" of the "I saw the future in a crystal ball" variety. Meaning, "outside of time" is not required to believe the Bible as written.
    Better than some. I rarely get 'election' acknowledged from anyone. It is 'almost like they want to cut that part out of their bibles.' I don't know any nonCalvinist that loves Romans 9, for instance. To me? Problematic. If I have to avoid or become squeamish, I'm likely needing to change my theology.
    My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
    Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
    Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
    Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
    No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
    Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

    Is Calvinism okay? Yep

    Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

    1Co 13:11 ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

    Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

  9. #548
    TOL Subscriber Grosnick Marowbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    34,046
    Thanks
    16,890
    Thanked 32,939 Times in 22,217 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147906
    Delete
    Last edited by Grosnick Marowbe; September 15th, 2018 at 06:19 PM.

  10. #549
    TOL Subscriber Grosnick Marowbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    34,046
    Thanks
    16,890
    Thanked 32,939 Times in 22,217 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147906
    Delete.
    Last edited by Grosnick Marowbe; September 15th, 2018 at 06:19 PM.

  11. #550
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    Perhaps we can discuss Ephesians 1:4 after these? If you so desire?
    One reading could take it we were never granted free will. If so, we have never sinned.

  12. #551
    TOL Subscriber Grosnick Marowbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    34,046
    Thanks
    16,890
    Thanked 32,939 Times in 22,217 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147906
    Quote Originally Posted by Lon View Post
    Disagree. God gets to make this call. 1 John 3:2 True is true and we both will indeed hold to it lest our faith is in vain. There is no way I can 'agree to disagree forever. Even in this life, God can certainly win out with either you or I. How stubborn do either of us have to be? God can bust down pride and make what He wants to come about.

    Understood. You are allowed to pick and choose what you want to discuss and who you want to do so with


    Thank you. John 6:37-40; 17:2
    After talking to a good friend of mine and a great Bible teacher today, I've decided NOT to debate you on those verses you suggested. My friend told me that, basically, it wouldn't accomplish anything.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Grosnick Marowbe For Your Post:

    Lon (September 16th, 2018)

  14. #552
    Over 3000 post club Rosenritter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,885
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 1,087 Posts

    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    203298
    Grace can turn or harden. Christ's sacrifice either hardens or softens. The 'act' doesn't change, the heart changes, such that even Grace to Pharaoh in the manner of warning and plagues, came across as hard to him and hardened him whereas the same equivalent to Nineveh turned them and softened them.


    Lon, it doesn't seem like warning or plague hardened Pharaoh's heart. It looks like it was something God did so that he would not listen to the warnings that he otherwise would have heeded, or to not yield to the plagues that he otherwise would have yielded. At least as written, the hardening seems like a distinct action.

    Exodus 7:11-14 KJV
    (11) Then Pharaoh also called the wise men and the sorcerers: now the magicians of Egypt, they also did in like manner with their enchantments.
    (12) For they cast down every man his rod, and they became serpents: but Aaron's rod swallowed up their rods.
    (13) And he hardened Pharaoh's heart, that he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had said.
    (14) And the LORD said unto Moses, Pharaoh's heart is hardened, he refuseth to let the people go.

    Exodus 10:24-27 KJV
    (24) And Pharaoh called unto Moses, and said, Go ye, serve the LORD; only let your flocks and your herds be stayed: let your little ones also go with you.
    (25) And Moses said, Thou must give us also sacrifices and burnt offerings, that we may sacrifice unto the LORD our God.
    (26) Our cattle also shall go with us; there shall not an hoof be left behind; for thereof must we take to serve the LORD our God; and we know not with what we must serve the LORD, until we come thither.
    (27) But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he would not let them go.

    There are instances where it says that Pharaoh hardened his own heart, but there are also times when after great duress and Pharaoh was in the process of yielding, that it speaks as if this was a specific action that intervened. My understanding is that Pharaoh's heart was still evil and that he wouldn't have relented under lesser circumstances, not that his heart suddenly turned righteous and God reversed that.

    Doesn't matter. Jonah wasn't willing. Saul wasn't willing. God 'makes' one willing. Yes, God made me willing too.


    Neither Jonah nor Saul were made willing. Saul had to be struck down where he lay naked prophesying. Jonah had to be swallowed by a fish, and we still have recorded episode where after he begrudgingly prophesied as he was told, he complained afterwards saying "See! I knew this would happen! Just kill me already." Jonah is an excellent proof that while God can force someone to go to a country with a storm and a fish, and even compel them to preach, he cannot force the heart.

    Jonah 4:1-3 KJV
    (1) But it displeased Jonah exceedingly, and he was very angry.
    (2) And he prayed unto the LORD, and said, I pray thee, O LORD, was not this my saying, when I was yet in my country? Therefore I fled before unto Tarshish: for I knew that thou art a gracious God, and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repentest thee of the evil.
    (3) Therefore now, O LORD, take, I beseech thee, my life from me; for it is better for me to die than to live.





  15. #553
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    8,839
    Thanks
    392
    Thanked 5,128 Times in 2,904 Posts

    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147756
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosenritter View Post
    I agree with GM's assessment, that is a good post. I think it is important to remember that we should look to one's fruits, especially if we disagree over specific doctrine or theory.

    Mat 13:28-30 KJV
    (28) He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
    (29) But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
    (30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

    To mix this with another parable, doesn't it matter far more what we become than were we started, whether the seed takes root and produces fruit a hundredfold, rather than what type of ground that seed managed to grow within? We don't have the right or wisdom to ultimately judge wheat from tares now. And even most especially from the Open perspective, where we understand that God himself has withheld judgment until the end.
    Places like TOL, however, are a special case. People come here (obstensively) in order to debate their doctrine. They come here expecting to be challenged and it is not unreasonable for someone to assume the role of challenger when they encounter false doctrine. Further, most of the people participating here are not in the category of the "average person who calls themselves 'Calvinist'". On the contrary, AMR, to name one example, isn't a typical pew sitting doctrinal sponge, he is a self-proclaimed expert. He not only claims to be a seminary professor but a pastor and even a near life long member of MENSA, of all things. He has no excuse and cannot rightly be treated as if he's the sort that is merely confused or simply wrong. He is not that! In fact, it is his type that create atheists all over the place. It is exactly his flavor of theism that most atheists reject. How many hundreds of thousands of people have followed Ayn Rand, for example, on the path she paved toward Hell precisely because of doctrines like predestination and original sin and other doctrines where sound reason is intentionally rejected in favor of dogma?

    Clete

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Clete For Your Post:

    glorydaz (September 18th, 2018),Grosnick Marowbe (September 16th, 2018),JudgeRightly (September 16th, 2018)

  17. #554
    Over 3000 post club Rosenritter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,885
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 1,087 Posts

    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    203298
    Quote Originally Posted by Grosnick Marowbe View Post
    After talking to a good friend of mine and a great Bible teacher today, I've decided NOT to debate you on those verses you suggested. My friend told me that, basically, it wouldn't accomplish anything.
    @Lon, may I take that challenge on John 6:37-40, 17:2? We've had a fairly good rapport and mutual respect for a while now and I have some context to add to those passages that I think may help. If we are extending on Grosnick's challenge, would you like to introduce those passages first with your understanding?

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Rosenritter For Your Post:

    Grosnick Marowbe (September 16th, 2018)

  19. #555
    Over 3000 post club Rosenritter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,885
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 1,087 Posts

    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    203298
    Quote Originally Posted by Clete View Post
    Places like TOL, however, are a special case. People come here (obstensively) in order to debate their doctrine. They come here expecting to be challenged and it is not unreasonable for someone to assume the role of challenger when they encounter false doctrine. Further, most of the people participating here are not in the category of the "average person who calls themselves 'Calvinist'". On the contrary, AMR, to name one example, isn't a typical pew sitting doctrinal sponge, he is a self-proclaimed expert. He not only claims to be a seminary professor but a pastor and even a near life long member of MENSA, of all things. He has no excuse and cannot rightly be treated as if he's the sort that is merely confused or simply wrong. He is not that! In fact, it is his type that create atheists all over the place. It is exactly his flavor of theism that most atheists reject. How many hundreds of thousands of people have followed Ayn Rand, for example, on the path she paved toward Hell precisely because of doctrines like predestination and original sin and other doctrines where sound reason is intentionally rejected in favor of dogma?

    Clete
    I understand where you are coming from and I have had those same thoughts myself. Bad doctrines and traditions leave damaged and dying in their wake, and it is not a valid justification for those that maintain them to simply say "they were never of us." But I am going to say that mere intelligence is not immunity to misunderstanding, and we should not forget to look for other signs. For example, love and longsuffering are fruits of the Holy Spirit, and you usually won't find these in long supply in someone who is actively spreading false doctrine with no remorse.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Rosenritter For Your Post:

    Grosnick Marowbe (September 16th, 2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (2 members and 1 guests)

  1. Clete,
  2. Ask Mr. Religion

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us