User Tag List

Page 4 of 18 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 269

Thread: Why don't creationists publish?

  1. #46
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    17,389
    Thanks
    324
    Thanked 10,657 Times in 7,765 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147826
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    [urlhttps://thenaturalhistorian.com/2012/11/03/the-state-of-creation-science-as-measured-by-scholarly-publishing/[/url]
    So your defense of your assertion that creationists don't publish is to provide proof that they do publish.

    Thanks, Mr Nothing To Add.

    Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 18th, 2018)

  3. #47
    Over 2000 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,104
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 441 Times in 310 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    213201
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    So your defense of your assertion that creationists don't publish is to provide proof that they do publish.
    =

  4. #48
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    17,389
    Thanks
    324
    Thanked 10,657 Times in 7,765 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147826
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    YyDXXVKlv7k
    Contribute something useful or sod off, numbskull.

    Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Stripe; August 18th, 2018 at 03:36 AM.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 18th, 2018)

  6. #49
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 670 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    370913
    Quote Originally Posted by 6days View Post
    Very good!
    The problem for evolutionists is wild extrapolations that are consistent with their belief system but inconsistent with the data.

    For example geneticists admit the data (mutation rate) is inconsistent with 'uphill' evolution. But, because they start with the conclusion that 'molecule to molecular biologist' evolution is truth, they ignore the data and invent rescue devices such as synergistic epistasis.
    Evolution need not be uphill. You appear to interpret the data to support your belief in the supremacy of humans. Evolution doesn't care. Evolution fits the organism to the environment. Doesn't give a rat's behind about what you or anyone else believes.

  7. #50
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 670 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    370913
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Brain View Post
    Creationism starts with a conclusion based on a literal reading of Genesis and then tries to fit theories in with that belief while discarding anything that contradicts it. That's not the scientific method by a long shot.


    The creationist problem in a nutshell.

  8. #51
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 670 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    370913
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    So your defense of your assertion that creationists don't publish is to provide proof that they do publish.

    Thanks, Mr Nothing To Add.

    Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
    Did you bother to read that?
    Here is the last paragraph:
    "Returning to creationist scholarly publications, only 60 research articles in 2011 don’t tell the whole story. Of those a good portion involve analysis of theological concerns rather than scientific. Many of the scientific articles are not based on new data collected but are more like commentaries and speculations about how flood geology could explain secular data. Very few actually propose hypotheses for which new data is collected and analyses to test those hypotheses. I’m not saying that there aren’t intelligent people who are willing to devote great time and attention to writing for the creationist cause. Reiterating what I’ve said before, I’m pointing out here and my last two posts is that a 50 year old hypothesis if it were great at explaining the features of the earth’s land-forms it should be attracting a much greater professional following yet the average age of the intellectual drivers of the creationists movement is going up year after year."

    Basically says creation science is a big yawn. The papers are not, for the most part, original science and they are written by the same group of club members.

  9. #52
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,519
    Thanks
    24,311
    Thanked 6,870 Times in 4,323 Posts

    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147604
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonahdog View Post
    Did you bother to read that?
    Here is the last paragraph:
    "Returning to creationist scholarly publications, only 60 research articles in 2011 donít tell the whole story. Of those a good portion involve analysis of theological concerns rather than scientific. Many of the scientific articles are not based on new data collected but are more like commentaries and speculations about how flood geology could explain secular data. Very few actually propose hypotheses for which new data is collected and analyses to test those hypotheses. Iím not saying that there arenít intelligent people who are willing to devote great time and attention to writing for the creationist cause. Reiterating what Iíve said before, Iím pointing out here and my last two posts is that a 50 year old hypothesis if it were great at explaining the features of the earthís land-forms it should be attracting a much greater professional following yet the average age of the intellectual drivers of the creationists movement is going up year after year."

    Basically says creation science is a big yawn. The papers are not, for the most part, original science and they are written by the same group of club members.
    The assertion was:

    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Creationists don't publish because creationists don't do science.
    The part you quoted proves that assertion wrong, first in that creationists do in fact publish, and second in that creationists do in fact do science.

    Please, as I've asked you before, PAY ATTENTION!

  10. #53
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 670 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    370913
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    The assertion was:



    The part you quoted proves that assertion wrong, first in that creationists do in fact publish, and second in that creationists do in fact do science.

    Please, as I've asked you before, PAY ATTENTION!
    Actually the article suggests that creationists do little actual science. PAY ATTENTION!!

  11. #54
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,519
    Thanks
    24,311
    Thanked 6,870 Times in 4,323 Posts

    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147604
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonahdog View Post
    Actually the article suggests that creationists do little actual science. PAY ATTENTION!!
    Doing a little bit of science IS STILL DOING SCIENCE!
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Creationists don't publish because creationists don't do science.
    The assertion was that creationists "Don't do science"

    Doing ANY amount of science contradicts that statement.

  12. #55
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    17,389
    Thanks
    324
    Thanked 10,657 Times in 7,765 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147826
    Darwinists hate thinking.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 18th, 2018)

  14. #56
    Over 2500 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,801
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 670 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    370913
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Doing a little bit of science IS STILL DOING SCIENCE!The assertion was that creationists "Don't do science"

    Doing ANY amount of science contradicts that statement.
    OK, you are correct. How about this, "Creationists do very little actual science." Work for you? I'm satisfied.

    Perhaps we can add "What little they do has little impact."

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Jonahdog For Your Post:

    User Name (August 19th, 2018)

  16. #57
    Over 2000 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,104
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked 441 Times in 310 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    213201
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Doing a little bit of science IS STILL DOING SCIENCE!The assertion was that creationists "Don't do science"

    Doing ANY amount of science contradicts that statement.
    Insofar as creationists do creationism, they don't do science. Any actual science they perform is minimal and has contributed nothing of value to the compendium of scientific knowledge.

  17. #58
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    17,389
    Thanks
    324
    Thanked 10,657 Times in 7,765 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147826
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Insofar as creationists do creationism, they don't do science. Any actual science they perform is minimal and has contributed nothing of value to the compendium of scientific knowledge.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 19th, 2018),Right Divider (August 19th, 2018),User Name (August 19th, 2018)

  19. #59
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    20,993
    Thanks
    2,095
    Thanked 5,986 Times in 4,399 Posts

    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147732
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    Darwinists hate thinking.
    now, to be fair, good thinking can hurt your brane if your not carful

  20. #60
    TOL Legend Arthur Brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
    Posts
    14,844
    Thanks
    9,026
    Thanked 7,088 Times in 4,721 Posts

    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147749
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Insofar as creationists do creationism, they don't do science. Any actual science they perform is minimal and has contributed nothing of value to the compendium of scientific knowledge.
    Well, pretty much. Still, "Dinosaur Adventure Land" is probably good for a laugh even amid the tax fraud and criticism from other YEC outfits...

    Well this is fun isn't it?


  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Brain For Your Post:

    User Name (August 19th, 2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us