User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Alex Jones: "Just Kidding"

  1. #1
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,593
    Thanks
    1,594
    Thanked 4,742 Times in 3,570 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2146641

    Alex Jones: "Just Kidding"

    Alex Jones’ attorney today argued that “no reasonable reader or listener” would expect that Jones spoke factually on his show, Infowars.


    Attorney Mark Enoch today spoke on Jones’ behalf in a Travis County, Texas courtroom. In a particularly contentious moment, Enoch attempted to explain away a Jones claim that an interview between CNN host Anderson Cooper and one of the plaintiffs in today’s lawsuit was faked in front of a green screen. Jones’ proof was that Cooper’s nose appeared to disappear each time he turned his head, evidence of a botched attempt at a composite shot. “When [Cooper] turns, his nose disappears repeatedly because the green screen isn’t set right,” Jones claimed on the show. (According to CNN, and a video forensics expert hired for the court case, the effect was actually a common occurrence, a compression artifact that often happens in video encoding.)


    more


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ok doser For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 2nd, 2018)

  3. #2
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,593
    Thanks
    1,594
    Thanked 4,742 Times in 3,570 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2146641
    Jones has long been a vocal supporter of the conspiracy theory that the Sandy Hook shooting was faked, an elaborate ruse by anti-gun politicians. He’s repeatedly, and staunchly, parroted the phrase “false flag” when speaking out on the issue.

    He’s also accused parents of being actors, claiming no children died in the shooting. This is false. Multiple on-scene reports — including those by medical personnel, law enforcement, faculty, parents, and other students — confirm that 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children between six and seven years old, as well as six adult staff members.

    These claims are the reason Jones finds himself in court today, his first of multiple pending defamation suits pertaining to comments he’s made about Sandy Hook.

    Jones, though, finds himself in a bit of a predicament.

    While Infowars has billed itself as the “lone crusader of truth,” as Texas Monthly put it, Jones’ (attorneys) are attempting to build a defense around the idea that their client doesn’t really means the words he says — a similar defense to the ones used in his custody case, where his legal team called Jones a “performance artist,” claiming he was playing a character on Infowars.

    It’s a fine line. Jones’ legal team now finds itself in the precarious position of attempting to convince both the courts and his audience. To his audience, he must maintain that he’s the lone source of truth in a world overrun with dishonest media. Simultaneously, he must convince the courts that his truly odd brand of entertainment is fictional, and that no “reasonable” person would mistake it as factual.

    One false step and Jones stands to lose millions, either in his viewers who abandon the show after finding out he’s misleading them for profit, or to the families of the victims he’s defamed if courts rule in their favor.

    In the first of these suits, Jones will try to convince the courts that he’s playing a character, and one that only a fool would take seriously — although one viewer, Lucky Richards, clearly didn’t get the message.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ok doser For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 2nd, 2018)

  5. #3
    Over 5000 post club rexlunae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The high desert
    Posts
    5,942
    Thanks
    1,321
    Thanked 2,974 Times in 1,872 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1034374
    Quote Originally Posted by ok doser View Post
    I feel like there's an a priori argument that could be applied:

    Q: Could a "reasonable person" have reached that conclusion?

    A: No, he's an Alex Jones listener.
    Global warming denialists are like gravity denialists piloting a helicopter, determined to prove a point. We may not have time to actually persuade them of their mistake.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rexlunae For Your Post:

    ok doser (August 2nd, 2018),Rusha (August 2nd, 2018)

  7. #4
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    16,738
    Thanks
    209
    Thanked 9,477 Times in 7,197 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147817
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Here's a post Town desperately wants you to read.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 2nd, 2018),ok doser (August 2nd, 2018)

  9. #5
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,593
    Thanks
    1,594
    Thanked 4,742 Times in 3,570 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2146641
    nice of kat to make a decoy thread to draw off all the tards

  10. #6
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    6,593
    Thanks
    20,194
    Thanked 5,823 Times in 3,697 Posts

    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147591
    Alex Jones is mentally ill, and should lose every cent he owns in this lawsuit.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    ok doser (August 2nd, 2018),rexlunae (August 2nd, 2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us