Tambora (August 11th, 2018)
Tambora (August 11th, 2018)
Well, a tort is an inherently civil matter aimed at compensation for a harm worked contrary to the right of the injured party. Torts are largely though not always the civil side of a criminal action, from the maliciously willful to the unintended but foreseeable. And, of course, there's vicarious liability on the part of an employer, which might not have any criminal teeth but is carried by virtue of benefit and scope.
In any event, when you live here you agree by your presence to be subject to the laws of the land. Taxation is a part of that and anyone who finds it unconscionable is free to find another land and people more to their liking.
You aren't what you eat, but you're always what you swallow.
Pro-Life
Even in the very best of situations, voting is still an unmitigated failure. The fact that any simple majority of individuals (mob) can determine an outcome that adversely affects the minority (mob rule) is against all natural rights. In the United State today, all who vote harm others so that they might benefit. By voting, they are also sanctioning theft of private property at the point of a gun, and the redistribution of that property to those who did not earn it.
JudgeRightly (July 13th, 2018)
Oh yes, taxes , no winning there. I have had trouble with "them" and managed to pay up too much to count. Now I go through a personal accountant, a CPA.
I thought you meant someone stealing someone's underwear off a clothes line?
I did not read the whole thread, so I assumed it might be minor theft, which is a civil tort. Underwear and taxes, to different things.
You see, people are forgetting about me on TOL, poor me, boo hoo.
So, what?
believe it!
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018),Tambora (August 11th, 2018),Town Heretic (July 11th, 2018)
You aren't what you eat, but you're always what you swallow.
Pro-Life
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018)
Even in the very best of situations, voting is still an unmitigated failure. The fact that any simple majority of individuals (mob) can determine an outcome that adversely affects the minority (mob rule) is against all natural rights. In the United State today, all who vote harm others so that they might benefit. By voting, they are also sanctioning theft of private property at the point of a gun, and the redistribution of that property to those who did not earn it.
JudgeRightly (July 13th, 2018)
You aren't what you eat, but you're always what you swallow.
Pro-Life
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018)
Even in the very best of situations, voting is still an unmitigated failure. The fact that any simple majority of individuals (mob) can determine an outcome that adversely affects the minority (mob rule) is against all natural rights. In the United State today, all who vote harm others so that they might benefit. By voting, they are also sanctioning theft of private property at the point of a gun, and the redistribution of that property to those who did not earn it.
Tambora (August 11th, 2018),Town Heretic (July 11th, 2018)
Even in the very best of situations, voting is still an unmitigated failure. The fact that any simple majority of individuals (mob) can determine an outcome that adversely affects the minority (mob rule) is against all natural rights. In the United State today, all who vote harm others so that they might benefit. By voting, they are also sanctioning theft of private property at the point of a gun, and the redistribution of that property to those who did not earn it.
Even in the very best of situations, voting is still an unmitigated failure. The fact that any simple majority of individuals (mob) can determine an outcome that adversely affects the minority (mob rule) is against all natural rights. In the United State today, all who vote harm others so that they might benefit. By voting, they are also sanctioning theft of private property at the point of a gun, and the redistribution of that property to those who did not earn it.
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018),Rusha (July 11th, 2018)
No, I really don't.
Meanwhile and on the point, I've defended taxation as a legal proposition and as a scripturally supported one.
I wrote: In any event, when you live here you agree by your presence to be subject to the laws of the land. Taxation is a part of that and anyone who finds it unconscionable is free to find another land and people more to their liking.
And this sort of declaration in lieu of reason is precisely what I'm speaking about as your problematic skewing, contextually. You appear to feel that how you want a thing to be is enough.
Nothing in that is a problematic stance morally, because I've already established scripturally that governments have authority that Christ noted and commanded his apostles to obey. Nothing about it is problematic rationally, because the laws of the land are written by that government and among those are the parameters of legal possession of a thing.
And that's that.
You aren't what you eat, but you're always what you swallow.
Pro-Life
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018),Rusha (July 11th, 2018)
annabenedetti (July 11th, 2018),Arthur Brain (July 11th, 2018),Tambora (August 11th, 2018)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)