User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Darwin’s Monkey Theory

  1. #1
    TOL Legend serpentdove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    14,808
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,774 Times in 2,549 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    559948

    What's new?
    PlastikBuddah [aka Gamera] make-believer. Kmoney [aka Count Iblis] make-believer. Alate_One deceives students in the classroom. Arthur Brain wants answers. Eph 5:11

    "Being a square keeps you from going around in circles." ~ J Vernon McGee Ro 3:23, 5:8, 6:23, 10:9, 10:13.

  2. #2
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    12,224
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 537 Times in 486 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    103649
    lol When they get that down to 6000 they will finally have it right. Intellectual idiots amaze me some times. We have people today that can make something right now to look like it is a hundred years old. And in the beginning God made everything to appear to be billions of years old. And the intellectuals fall for it.
    Last edited by Squeaky; June 12th, 2018 at 06:28 AM.

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Squeaky View Post
    lol When they get that down to 6000 they will finally have it right. Intellectual idiots amaze me some times. We have people today that can make something right now to look like it is a hundred years old. And in the beginning God made everything to appear to be billions of years old. And the intellectuals fall for it.
    Like I say if evolution works why are there still monkeys in zoos and swinging from trees?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Old Timer SonOfCaleb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    426
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 107 Times in 91 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    7485
    At a biological level theres ZERO evidence for DNA being able to transmute itself into a totally different DNA producing a different species from the former. It simply doesnt exist. Unfortunately most Biologists have careers and a livelyhood to think about which means means notables like Dawkins are suitably incentivised financially and ideaologically to fix the evidence around their objective, which in turn requires the neccesary mental gymnastics and dissonance required to reconcile these opposing positions.

    The elephant in the room which evolutionists totally ignore though is Anthropology. The oldest Anthropological evidence is just over 4000 years old. This is an empircal fact which due to the nature of Anthropology is not stymied by the inaccuracies of carbon dating techniques.
    In essence the age of the civilisations -who incidentally emerged suddenly in the fossil record- is not contemporaneous with any of the suggested and more ancient dates for mankind which depending on who you speak to range from hundreds of thousands of years to millions of years. Thus according to evolution man went from an Ape and whatever species the Ape purportedly evolved from and son on to cognitive humans and civilisation with art, language, polities, religion, agriculture etc etc literally within a blink of an eye.

    Quite ironic the huge leapt of faith required to believe such nonsense.
    John 1:1 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. 2 This one was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence".

  5. #5
    Over 750 post club Bradley D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Llorente, E. Samar Philippines
    Posts
    751
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 236 Times in 160 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    166639
    It is still "theory" a conjecture. They cannot explain how a single cell came about, which is made of many parts.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us