Well aware, and agreed. Which is why it's part of my argument.
It's the fact that you CAN find C14 in fossils and diamonds that we know that they are not millions of years old. You may want to go read the article yourself, because you've clearly missed the point of my argument.Do you see how you might not be able to accurately measure a millions year old fossil with that method? It's like breaking open a diamond to look for coal: that stuff is long gone
If there is significant amounts of C14 in fossils, diamonds, and other places which are claimed to be millions of years old, then those items cannot, I repeat, CANNOT be millions of years old, BECAUSE C14 breaks down completely (to levels which are insignificant) in less than 100,000 years.You can't reject dating methods, then claim an improperly used dating method supports you. That's just silly
Derf (April 2nd, 2018),GeoffW (April 7th, 2018),George Affleck (April 1st, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)
Tambora (April 4th, 2018)
Tambora (April 4th, 2018)
Except there is c14 being discovered in significant amounts.
There are plenty of links on http://kgov.com/c14 that link to places it has been found.
jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)