User Tag List

Page 3 of 118 FirstFirst 1234561353103 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1765

Thread: Isn't it reasonable to doubt Young Earth Creationism?

  1. #31
    Over 5000 post club 6days's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    5,938
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 3,994 Times in 2,378 Posts

    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    1805158
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    By the way, what is an Oort Clod?
    That refers to a group of people, known as clods, who deny the evidence pointing to a young universe.
    Without Genesis, absolutely nothing makes sense in all of Scripture.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 6days For Your Post:

    jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018),JudgeRightly (April 1st, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018),Yorzhik (June 2nd, 2018)

  3. #32
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    25,176
    Thanked 7,044 Times in 4,442 Posts

    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147607
    Quote Originally Posted by 6days View Post
    That refers to a group of people, known as clods, who deny the evidence pointing to a young universe.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  5. #33
    Over 5000 post club 6days's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    5,938
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 3,994 Times in 2,378 Posts

    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    1805158
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Here's a piece of evidence that contradicts a 4.54 billion year old earth.

    http://kgov.com/carbon-14-and-dinosaur-bones
    there is MUCH evidence that contradicts the old earth beliefs. The best evidence however, is the eye witness testimony of the One who was there at the beginning.
    Without Genesis, absolutely nothing makes sense in all of Scripture.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 6days For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (April 1st, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  7. #34
    LIFETIME MEMBER jamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    12,049
    Thanks
    1,462
    Thanked 1,327 Times in 1,163 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    327088
    Quote Originally Posted by 6days View Post
    No... Scripture actually says that in six days God created the heavens and the earth and everything in them. Jesus taught that humans were from the beginning of creation.

    The belief in inhabitants existing before Adam and Eve is heretical in that it destroys the purpose of Christ's physical death and resurrection.
    Jesus died for the angelic beings who sinned and human beings who sinned.

    That's why he reconciled everyone to the Father.

  8. #35
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 6days View Post
    there is MUCH evidence that contradicts the old earth beliefs. The best evidence however, is the eye witness testimony of the One who was there at the beginning.
    Still not a single piece of evidence to contradict a 4.54 billions year old earth.

    Stuart

  9. #36
    Over 4000 post club Jose Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,252
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 611 Times in 440 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    196951
    Quote Originally Posted by 6days View Post
    Like before, you rely on hypothetical potential resolutions to support your house of cards. Explaining away the evidence is not science.
    Again you try and deflect by accusing others of your own faults.

    Your belief system attempts to interpret evidence in a way that fits your beliefs
    Exhibit A.

    What's truly funny is how with the above you seem to understand that bias in interpreting evidence is a bad thing. Yet you continue to employ an extremely biased framework yourself.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Jose Fly For Your Post:

    jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018)

  11. #37
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Here's a piece of evidence that contradicts a 4.54 billion year old earth.

    http://kgov.com/carbon-14-and-dinosaur-bones
    Sorry, but a creationist website is not 'evidence'. I'm not going fishing for you. Where in that confused mash of science words is there a single fact that disproves a 4.54 billion year old earth?

    Stuart

  12. #38
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    25,176
    Thanked 7,044 Times in 4,442 Posts

    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147607
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Sorry, but a creationist website is not 'evidence'. I'm not going fishing for you. Where in that confused mash of science words is there a single fact that disproves a 4.54 billion year old earth?

    Stuart
    Talk about bias...

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  14. #39
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Talk about bias...
    You said evidence. Well?

    Stuart

  15. #40
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    25,176
    Thanked 7,044 Times in 4,442 Posts

    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147607
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    You said evidence. Well?

    Stuart
    Carbon 14 existing in places where it shouldn't if the BB is true. See the link above for details.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    jsanford108 (April 6th, 2018),Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  17. #41
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Carbon 14 existing in places where it shouldn't if the BB is true. See the link above for details.
    Huh? What does that mean?

    Stuart

  18. #42
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    25,176
    Thanked 7,044 Times in 4,442 Posts

    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147607
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Huh? What does that mean?

    Stuart
    Stuart, I'm not going to babysit you through learning about how carbon-14 exists where it shouldn't if BB is true. I gave you a link for you to read which provides details. I recommend you click on it and learn something.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  20. #43
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Stuart, I'm not going to babysit you through learning about how carbon-14 exists where it shouldn't if BB is true. I gave you a link for you to read which provides details. I recommend you click on it and learn something.
    Can you tell me where 'Carbon 14 exist[s] in places where it shouldn't', and exactly why that is, and what paper published those results, and what peer review process the journal has in place, and what the status of those results is in the wider context of the field of radioisotope dating?

    Stuart

  21. #44
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    7,787
    Thanks
    25,176
    Thanked 7,044 Times in 4,442 Posts

    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147607
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Can you tell me where 'Carbon 14 exist[s] in places where it shouldn't', and exactly why that is, and what paper published those results, and what peer review process the journal has in place, and what the status of those results is in the wider context of the field of radioisotope dating?

    Stuart
    The article sure does. You should read it.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    Tambora (April 4th, 2018)

  23. #45
    Over 4000 post club Jose Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,252
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 611 Times in 440 Posts

    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    196951
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Still not a single piece of evidence to contradict a 4.54 billions year old earth.

    Stuart
    If some Christians want to run around telling everyone that to be a Christian you have to believe the earth is flat and only 6,000 years old, I say let 'em.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us