User Tag List

Page 54 of 275 FirstFirst ... 4445152535455565764104154 ... LastLast
Results 796 to 810 of 4116

Thread: The earth is flat and we never went to the moon--Part II

  1. #796
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    Hey Patrick what is the purpose of the globe earth cover-up?

    After all every conspiracy has a purpose. They say 9/11 was an inside job and it was to convince the nation is was okay to go to war with Iraq and steal their oil. The Sandy Hook massacre (and other mass shootings) were faked or orchestrated to promote gun control. JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald to cover-up that it was really the CIA that assassinated him. Etc., etc. etc.

    If the earth were truly flat and not a sphere it would be bar far the largest cover-up in history involving the most willing participants by a 100-thousand-fold.

    But what's the point in hiding that the earth is flat?? What is the pay-off?
    I don't think there's necessarily a pay off per se, but a mechanism of control. A deception that started innocently enough when Erastothenes decided it was a ball 2100 years ago or so, by himself with a stick and a shadow. We've gone off of his assumption and his math until they changed it several times and changed it again recently. You know, to make it better. Fast forward to Copernicus and Pythagoras, and more globe based math with deep endless space. They were both Jesuits. Galileo and Newton continued the fallacy but none actually tried to deceive, Imo. BTW, Newton and Galileo, Jesuits. The Jesuits have controlled cosmology for a thousand years or more.

    Nobody knew for sure and everything seemed to line up as a globe. Here comes Einstein and with his buddy, a Jesuit priest from Belgium, who first had the idea for the big bang convinced Einstein of the Big Bangeroo too. Even by this time nobody has been high enough to see the earth curvature. In 1931 a scientist, an associate of Einstein, Captain Picard saw the earth from above. They had ideas that the earth might not be a globe. Confirmed, possibly in the 30s 40s 50s or 60 & 61.

    At this point, what do you do, announce to the world that the earth is flat? You think? Why would they tell us? Give some compelling reasons why they would or should tell us. Now, they fake the moon landings as everyone knows and LOSE every record and every bit of data. Amazing. No pictures that aren't altered, CGI, artist renderings or photo shopped. Wide angle lenses, fish eye lenses, controlled digital CGI fake footage from space.

    The ISS is probably unmanned, satellites don't prove a globe. Nobody really needs to be lied to or deceived because we all believe the globe. Very few people have ever known and/or DO know the whole truth. Very few have seen from above and/or seen real actual images or footage. If one doesn't think the world is managed and controlled by the banking elite and secret societies who own all of media and entertainment, if one does not believe that their is a Luciferian agenda happening and has been happening since the garden and the flood, then they may be deceived.

    There are many reasons to hide the truth from the world. My thoughts are that the powers that be are scared of the reaction, the unknown, the possible loss of the status quo. Free energy, resources, possible large swaths of habitable land, who knows how far it extends beyond the ice wall?

    I can show my concept of the earth and the ice wall with frozen land beyond, or you can find it recent posts in the Biblical Flat Earth Thread. You knew you couldn't get away with no memes right, Knight? Lots of typos because it wouldn't let me fix them before I post. 9/11 was also for the heroin in Afghanistan, the launch of more surveillance, the everlasting perpetual "war on terror" and many other reasons. Back to FE, another reason is that nearly everybody would lose their faith and trust in science cosmology and teachings. The entire academic system and huge parts of the scientific community would look like dummies.




  2. The Following User Says Thank You to patrick jane For Your Post:

    DFT_Dave (April 6th, 2018)

  3. #797
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    The Jesuits have controlled cosmology for a thousand years or more.
    Mad. Utterly bonkers.

    Stuart

  4. #798
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Mad. Utterly bonkers.

    Stuart
    Historical cosmologies[edit]

    Further information: Timeline of cosmology and Nicolaus Copernicus § Copernican system
    Name Author and date Classification Remarks
    Hindu cosmology Rigveda (c. 1700–1100 BC) Cyclical or oscillating, Infinite in time One cycle of existence is around 311 trillion years and the life of one universe around 8 billion years. This Universal cycle is preceded by an infinite number of universes and to be followed by another infinite number of universes. Includes an infinite number of universes at one given time.
    Jain cosmology Jain Agamas (written around 500 AD as per the teachings of Mahavira599–527 BC) Cyclical or oscillating, eternal and finite Jain cosmology considers the loka, or universe, as an uncreated entity, existing since infinity, the shape of the universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on his waist. This Universe, according to Jainism, is broad at the top, narrow at the middle and once again becomes broad at the bottom.
    Babylonian cosmology Babylonian literature (c. 3000 BC) Flat earth floating in infinite "waters of chaos" The Earth and the Heavens form a unit within infinite "waters of chaos"; the earth is flat and circular, and a solid dome (the "firmament") keeps out the outer "chaos"-ocean.
    Eleatic cosmology Parmenides (c. 515 BC) Finite and spherical in extent The Universe is unchanging, uniform, perfect, necessary, timeless, and neither generated nor perishable. Void is impossible. Plurality and change are products of epistemic ignorance derived from sense experience. Temporal and spatial limits are arbitrary and relative to the Parmenidean whole.
    Biblical cosmology Genesis creation narrative Earth floating in infinite "waters of chaos" The Earth and the Heavens form a unit within infinite "waters of chaos"; the "firmament" keeps out the outer "chaos"-ocean.
    Atomist universe Anaxagoras (500–428 BC) & later Epicurus Infinite in extent The universe contains only two things: an infinite number of tiny seeds (atoms) and the void of infinite extent. All atoms are made of the same substance, but differ in size and shape. Objects are formed from atom aggregations and decay back into atoms. Incorporates Leucippus' principle of causality: "nothing happens at random; everything happens out of reason and necessity". The universe was not ruled by gods.[citation needed]
    Pythagorean universe Philolaus (d. 390 BC) Existence of a "Central Fire" at the center of the Universe. At the center of the Universe is a central fire, around which the Earth, Sun, Moon and planets revolve uniformly. The Sun revolves around the central fire once a year, the stars are immobile. The earth in its motion maintains the same hidden face towards the central fire, hence it is never seen. First known non-geocentric model of the Universe.[18]
    De Mundo Pseudo-Aristotle (d. 250 BC or between 350 and 200 BC) The Universe then is a system made up of heaven and earth and the elements which are contained in them. There are "five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater — namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether — make up the whole Universe."[19]
    Stoic universe Stoics (300 BC – 200 AD) Island universe The cosmos is finite and surrounded by an infinite void. It is in a state of flux, and pulsates in size and undergoes periodic upheavals and conflagrations.
    Aristotelian universe Aristotle (384–322 BC) Geocentric, static, steady state, finite extent, infinite time Spherical earth is surrounded by concentric celestial spheres. Universe exists unchanged throughout eternity. Contains a fifth element, called aether, that was added to the four classical elements.
    Aristarchean universe Aristarchus (circa 280 BC) Heliocentric Earth rotates daily on its axis and revolves annually about the sun in a circular orbit. Sphere of fixed stars is centered about the sun.
    Ptolemaic model Ptolemy (2nd century AD) Geocentric (based on Aristotelian universe) Universe orbits around a stationary Earth. Planets move in circular epicycles, each having a center that moved in a larger circular orbit (called an eccentric or a deferent) around a center-point near Earth. The use of equants added another level of complexity and allowed astronomers to predict the positions of the planets. The most successful universe model of all time, using the criterion of longevity. Almagest (the Great System).
    Aryabhatan model Aryabhata (499) Geocentric or Heliocentric The Earth rotates and the planets move in elliptical orbits around either the Earth or Sun; uncertain whether the model is geocentric or heliocentric due to planetary orbits given with respect to both the Earth and Sun.
    Medieval universe Medieval philosophers(500–1200) Finite in time A universe that is finite in time and has a beginning is proposed by the Christian philosopher John Philoponus, who argues against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past. Logical arguments supporting a finite universe are developed by the early Muslim philosopher Alkindus, the Jewish philosopher Saadia Gaon, and the Muslim theologian Algazel.
    Multiversal cosmology Fakhr al-Din al-Razi(1149–1209) Multiverse, multiple worlds and universes There exists an infinite outer space beyond the known world, and God has the power to fill the vacuum with an infinite number of universes.
    Maragha models Maragha school (1259–1528) Geocentric Various modifications to Ptolemaic model and Aristotelian universe, including rejection of equant and eccentrics at Maragheh observatory, and introduction of Tusi-couple by Al-Tusi. Alternative models later proposed, including the first accurate lunar model by Ibn al-Shatir, a model rejecting stationary Earth in favour of Earth's rotation by Ali Kuşçu, and planetary model incorporating "circular inertia" by Al-Birjandi.
    Nilakanthan model Nilakantha Somayaji(1444–1544) Geocentric and heliocentric A universe in which the planets orbit the Sun, which orbits the Earth; similar to the later Tychonic system
    Copernican universe Nicolaus Copernicus(1473–1543) Heliocentric with circular planetary orbits First described in De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.
    Tychonic system Tycho Brahe (1546–1601) Geocentric and Heliocentric A universe in which the planets orbit the Sun and the Sun orbits the Earth, similar to the earlier Nilakanthan model.
    Bruno's cosmology Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) Infinite extent, infinite time, homogeneous, isotropic, non-hierarchical Rejects the idea of a hierarchical universe. Earth and Sun have no special properties in comparison with the other heavenly bodies. The void between the stars is filled with aether, and matter is composed of the same four elements (water, earth, fire, and air), and is atomistic, animistic and intelligent.
    Keplerian Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) Heliocentric with elliptical planetary orbits Kepler's discoveries, marrying mathematics and physics, provided the foundation for our present conception of the Solar system, but distant stars were still seen as objects in a thin, fixed celestial sphere.
    Static Newtonian Isaac Newton (1642–1727) Static (evolving), steady state, infinite Every particle in the universe attracts every other particle. Matter on the large scale is uniformly distributed. Gravitationally balanced but unstable.
    Cartesian Vortexuniverse René Descartes, 17th century Static (evolving), steady state, infinite System of huge swirling whirlpools of aethereal or fine matter produces what we would call gravitational effects. But his vacuum was not empty; all space was filled with matter.
    Hierarchical universe Immanuel Kant, Johann Lambert, 18th century Static (evolving), steady state, infinite Matter is clustered on ever larger scales of hierarchy. Matter is endlessly recycled.
    Einstein Universe with a cosmological constant Albert Einstein, 1917 Static (nominally). Bounded (finite) "Matter without motion". Contains uniformly distributed matter. Uniformly curved spherical space; based on Riemann's hypersphere. Curvature is set equal to Λ. In effect Λ is equivalent to a repulsive force which counteracts gravity. Unstable.
    De Sitter universe Willem de Sitter, 1917 Expanding flat space.Steady state. Λ > 0 "Motion without matter." Only apparently static. Based on Einstein's general relativity. Space expands with constant acceleration. Scale factorincreases exponentially (constant inflation).
    MacMillan universe William Duncan MacMillan1920s Static and steady state New matter is created from radiation; starlight perpetually recycled into new matter particles.
    Friedmann universe, spherical space Alexander Friedmann1922 Spherical expanding space.k= +1 ; no Λ Positive curvature. Curvature constant k = +1Expands then recollapses. Spatially closed (finite).
    Friedmann universe, hyperbolic space Alexander Friedmann, 1924 Hyperbolic expanding space.k= -1 ; no Λ Negative curvature. Said to be infinite (but ambiguous). Unbounded. Expands forever.
    Dirac large numbers hypothesis Paul Dirac 1930s Expanding Demands a large variation in G, which decreases with time. Gravity weakens as universe evolves.
    Friedmann zero-curvature Einstein and De Sitter, 1932 Expanding flat spacek= 0 ; Λ = 0 Critical density Curvature constant k = 0. Said to be infinite (but ambiguous). "Unbounded cosmos of limited extent". Expands forever. "Simplest" of all known universes. Named after but not considered by Friedmann. Has a deceleration term q =½, which means that its expansion rate slows down.
    The original Big Bang(Friedmann-Lemaître) Georges Lemaître 1927–29 ExpansionΛ > 0 Λ > |Gravity| Λ is positive and has a magnitude greater than gravity. Universe has initial high-density state ("primeval atom"). Followed by a two-stage expansion. Λ is used to destabilize the universe. (Lemaître is considered the father of the big bang model.)
    Oscillating universe(Friedmann-Einstein) Favored by Friedmann, 1920s Expanding and contracting in cycles Time is endless and beginningless; thus avoids the beginning-of-time paradox. Perpetual cycles of big bang followed by big crunch. (Einstein's first choice after he rejected his 1917 model.)
    Eddington universe Arthur Eddington 1930 First static then expands Static Einstein 1917 universe with its instability disturbed into expansion mode; with relentless matter dilution becomes a De Sitter universe. Λ dominates gravity.
    Milne universe of kinematic relativity Edward Milne, 1933, 1935;William H. McCrea, 1930s Kinematic expansion without space expansion Rejects general relativity and the expanding space paradigm. Gravity not included as initial assumption. Obeys cosmological principle and special relativity; consists of a finite spherical cloud of particles (or galaxies) that expands within an infinite and otherwise empty flat space. It has a center and a cosmic edge (surface of the particle cloud) that expands at light speed. Explanation of gravity was elaborate and unconvincing.
    Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker class of models Howard Robertson, Arthur Walker, 1935 Uniformly expanding Class of universes that are homogeneous and isotropic. Spacetime separates into uniformly curved space and cosmic time common to all co-moving observers. The formulation system is now known as the FLRW or Robertson–Walker metrics of cosmic time and curved space.
    Steady-stateexpanding Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, 1948 Expanding, steady state, infinite Matter creation rate maintains constant density. Continuous creation out of nothing from nowhere. Exponential expansion. Deceleration term q = -1.
    Steady-state expanding Fred Hoyle 1948 Expanding, steady state; but unstable Matter creation rate maintains constant density. But since matter creation rate must be exactly balanced with the space expansion rate the system is unstable.
    Ambiplasma Hannes Alfvén 1965 Oskar Klein Cellular universe, expanding by means of matter–antimatter annihilation Based on the concept of plasma cosmology. The universe is viewed as "meta-galaxies" divided by double layers and thus a bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other bubbles. Ongoing cosmic matter-antimatter annihilations keep the bubbles separated and moving apart preventing them from interacting.
    Brans–Dicke theory Carl H. Brans, Robert H. Dicke Expanding Based on Mach's principle. G varies with time as universe expands. "But nobody is quite sure what Mach's principle actually means."[citation needed]
    Cosmic inflation Alan Guth 1980 Big Bang modified to solve horizonand flatness problems Based on the concept of hot inflation. The universe is viewed as a multiple quantum flux—hence its bubble-like nature. Other universes are formed from other bubbles. Ongoing cosmic expansion kept the bubbles separated and moving apart.
    Eternal inflation(a multiple universe model) Andreï Linde, 1983 Big Bang with cosmic inflation Multiverse based on the concept of cold inflation, in which inflationary events occur at random each with independent initial conditions; some expand into bubble universes supposedly like our entire cosmos. Bubbles nucleate in a spacetime foam.
    Cyclic model Paul Steinhardt; Neil Turok 2002 Expanding and contracting in cycles; M-theory. Two parallel orbifold planes or M-branes collide periodically in a higher-dimensional space. With quintessence or dark energy.
    Cyclic model Lauris Baum; Paul Frampton 2007 Solution of Tolman's entropy problem Phantom dark energy fragments universe into large number of disconnected patches. Our patch contracts containing only dark energy with zero entropy.
    Table notes: the term "static" simply means not expanding and not contracting. Symbol G represents Newton's gravitational constant; Λ (Lambda) is the cosmological constant.
    Last edited by patrick jane; April 6th, 2018 at 04:22 AM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to patrick jane For Your Post:

    DFT_Dave (April 6th, 2018)

  6. #799
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    This article needs additional citations for verification
    It sure does.

    For example, some citation linking the bonkers claim to the copy-paste from the Holy Wikipedia.

    Stuart

  7. #800
    TOL Subscriber musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22,202
    Thanks
    4,465
    Thanked 20,982 Times in 11,989 Posts

    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147773
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post


    These two bring up God and Satan. Whenever that happens, salvation IS involved, if not explicitly, then implicitly. Can't cut this two ways, Patrick.
    "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
    Terence Mc Lean

    [most will be very surprised]


    Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
    By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

  8. #801
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by musterion View Post
    These two bring up God and Satan. Whenever that happens, salvation IS involved, if not explicitly, then implicitly. Can't cut this two ways, Patrick.
    So I'll leave satan out of it, so nobody has to think about satan anymore.

  9. #802
    ...then I woke up. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,925
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 2,335 Times in 1,100 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1097775
    Quote Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
    Be it known to all that "Patrick" here refers to Patrick Jane (username), real name Mark, and not Ask Mr. Religion (real name Patrick).

    And let me just short-circuit the inevitable "I'm sure he is pouring over links as we speak" that will come in my case.

    AMR
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Just FYI it's "poring" lol


    Thanks fellas.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Knight For Your Post:

    Ask Mr. Religion (April 6th, 2018)

  11. #803
    ...then I woke up. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,925
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 2,335 Times in 1,100 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1097775
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    I don't think there's necessarily a pay off per se, but a mechanism of control. A deception that started innocently enough when Erastothenes decided it was a ball 2100 years ago or so, by himself with a stick and a shadow. We've gone off of his assumption and his math until they changed it several times and changed it again recently. You know, to make it better. Fast forward to Copernicus and Pythagoras, and more globe based math with deep endless space. They were both Jesuits. Galileo and Newton continued the fallacy but none actually tried to deceive, Imo. BTW, Newton and Galileo, Jesuits. The Jesuits have controlled cosmology for a thousand years or more.
    That makes no sense to me whatsoever.

    Nobody knew for sure and everything seemed to line up as a globe. Here comes Einstein and with his buddy, a Jesuit priest from Belgium, who first had the idea for the big bang convinced Einstein of the Big Bangeroo too. Even by this time nobody has been high enough to see the earth curvature. In 1931 a scientist, an associate of Einstein, Captain Picard saw the earth from above. They had ideas that the earth might not be a globe. Confirmed, possibly in the 30s 40s 50s or 60 & 61.

    At this point, what do you do, announce to the world that the earth is flat? You think? Why would they tell us? Give some compelling reasons why they would or should tell us.
    Why you ask?? Why tell us the earth is actually flat and not round? Why not?? There is literally no reasonable reason not to.


    Now, they fake the moon landings as everyone knows and LOSE every record and every bit of data. Amazing. No pictures that aren't altered, CGI, artist renderings or photo shopped. Wide angle lenses, fish eye lenses, controlled digital CGI fake footage from space.
    Thanks for discrediting my father's life work

    There are many reasons to hide the truth from the world. My thoughts are that the powers that be are scared of the reaction, the unknown, the possible loss of the status quo. Free energy, resources, possible large swaths of habitable land, who knows how far it extends beyond the ice wall?
    You are certifiably insane.

    But hey.... everyone has a right to be a moron.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knight For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (April 6th, 2018),Right Divider (April 6th, 2018)

  13. #804
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,277
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Patrick Jane's lengthy meme images are wearing out my scroll wheel. I reckon he could shout us all new mice.

    Stuart

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Stuu For Your Post:

    Knight (April 6th, 2018)

  15. #805
    TOL Subscriber musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22,202
    Thanks
    4,465
    Thanked 20,982 Times in 11,989 Posts

    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147773
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    So I'll leave satan out of it, so nobody has to think about satan anymore.
    This is why it looks like you're not serious about this but are just having fun with a sure-fire attention getter, like with the controversy thread. Dave, he seems hard-core about this. It's hard to say what you really believe here.
    "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
    Terence Mc Lean

    [most will be very surprised]


    Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
    By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to musterion For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (April 6th, 2018)

  17. #806
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by musterion View Post
    This is why it looks like you're not serious about this but are just having fun with a sure-fire attention getter, like with the controversy thread. Dave, he seems hard-core about this. It's hard to say what you really believe here.
    I don't see what mentioning satan in the deception of the shape of the earth has to do with salvation. I'm serious about flat earth, geocentric earth and conspiracies. The tranny videos are just funny and some are true I think. It's hard to tell, but eliminating the two genders is part of the new age agenda.

  18. #807
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post


    Thanks for discrediting my father's life work

    You are certifiably insane.

    But hey.... everyone has a right to be a moron.
    Everybody has opinions . . . I'd rather be a moron than blinded by fake science. Your father's work was real, as I said, rockets and spacecraft etc. were designed built and launched. Did he go to the moon? Then you're just being deceptive untruthful as I've seen is commonplace for you on this topic.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to patrick jane For Your Post:

    1Mind1Spirit (April 6th, 2018)

  20. #808
    TOL Subscriber musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22,202
    Thanks
    4,465
    Thanked 20,982 Times in 11,989 Posts

    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147773
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    I don't see what mentioning satan in the deception of the shape of the earth has to do with salvation.
    Already explained that. Not saying you but: when FEs invoke Satan and God, they're automatically invoking evil vs good, which damn well does involve salvation (whatever they think that means) and I think you know that. Not saying some of them are calling FE the gospel, but some of them CLEARLY IMPLY this is a good/evil issue depending on which side you're on...God's or Satan's. That equals Heaven or Hell.

    YOU may not think so but some of THEM do, and you're quoting them.

    But when you laugh that off, I wonder how serious you really are here.
    "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
    Terence Mc Lean

    [most will be very surprised]


    Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
    By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to musterion For Your Post:

    Ask Mr. Religion (April 6th, 2018),JudgeRightly (April 6th, 2018),Right Divider (April 6th, 2018)

  22. #809
    TOL Legend patrick jane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,467
    Thanks
    18,155
    Thanked 16,590 Times in 13,029 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147778
    Quote Originally Posted by musterion View Post
    Already explained that. Not saying you but: when FEs invoke Satan and God, they're automatically invoking evil vs good, which damn well does involve salvation (whatever they think that means) and I think you know that. Not saying some of them are calling FE the gospel, but some of them CLEARLY IMPLY this is a good/evil issue depending on which side you're on...God's or Satan's. That equals Heaven or Hell.

    YOU may not think so but some of THEM do, and you're quoting them.

    But when you laugh that off, I wonder how serious you really are here.
    With that thinking then every single detail of every single thing is salvation related, and maybe it is. I think the memes are just saying that it's POSSIBLE that the shape of earth is part of satan's many deceptions. Aren't they simply showing what the Bible says and what evolution, big bang thinking really is? I just don't see the "you're evil if you believe the globe" nor do I see "you better believe flat earth or you're going to hell" - I just don't see that distinction being made in any of the memes I used.

  23. #810
    TOL Subscriber musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    22,202
    Thanks
    4,465
    Thanked 20,982 Times in 11,989 Posts

    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147773
    okay
    "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
    Terence Mc Lean

    [most will be very surprised]


    Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
    By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us