User Tag List

Page 13 of 17 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 195 of 253

Thread: Flat earth proven false

  1. #181
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,411
    Thanks
    18,066
    Thanked 16,568 Times in 13,014 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    0


    Deception Station is #7 down the left on the left hand side. Can anybody prove this wrong yet?

  2. #182
    Over 5000 post club 1Mind1Spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks
    780
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 1,097 Posts

    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    727229
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Then the burden of proof is on you to prove such.
    Nope.
    Burden of proof lies with the OP and those who believe it.

    And my question was in response to your post. Could you please answer the question:

    Do you reject a Buddhist's claim that 1+1=3 based on his philosophy? Or because 1+1 does not equal three?
    I know nothing of Buddhism.

  3. #183
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    6,105
    Thanks
    18,748
    Thanked 5,430 Times in 3,429 Posts

    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147586
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    Nope.
    Burden of proof lies with the OP and those who believe it.
    NOPE.

    "It is a general rule that the party who alleges the affirmative of any proposition shall prove it."
    -https://www.lectlaw.com/def2/o038.htm

    You are asserting that the earth is flat, that the images/video provided above are fake, etc. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to prove it.

    I know nothing of Buddhism.
    NOT THE POINT. Do you reject that a Buddhist's claim that 1+1=3 is wrong based on the fact that he's a Buddhist, or because 1+1 does not equal 3?

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    Right Divider (April 20th, 2018),Tambora (May 16th, 2018)

  5. #184
    Over 5000 post club 1Mind1Spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks
    780
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 1,097 Posts

    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    727229
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    NOPE.

    "It is a general rule that the party who alleges the affirmative of any proposition shall prove it."
    -https://www.lectlaw.com/def2/o038.htm

    You are asserting that the earth is flat, that the images/video provided above are fake, etc. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to prove it.
    The image was computer generated.

    Reality proves it.


    NOT THE POINT. Do you reject that a Buddhist's claim that 1+1=3 is wrong based on the fact that he's a Buddhist, or because 1+1 does not equal 3?
    If you have a point, by all means get on with it.

  6. #185
    Gold level Subscriber JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    6,105
    Thanks
    18,748
    Thanked 5,430 Times in 3,429 Posts

    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147586
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    The image was computer generated.
    Repeated assertion does not make the assertion true. Another logical fallacy, "proof by (repeated) assertion."

    Reality proves it.
    "Reality" has nothing to do with the onus being on you to prove that the images/video are CGI, which you still have yet to do.

    If you have a point, by all means get on with it.
    So you are unable to answer a question unless there's a point to it?

    Just answer the question and we can move on.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to JudgeRightly For Your Post:

    Tambora (May 16th, 2018)

  8. #186
    Over 2000 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks
    473
    Thanked 424 Times in 296 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203711
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    Burden of proof lies with the OP and those who believe it.
    The proof is in the OP.

    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    ( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡)


    .•.•*) .•*)
    (.• (.• .• .•`•.•:**:•..•:**:•..•:**:•..•...

  9. #187
    Over 5000 post club 1Mind1Spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks
    780
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 1,097 Posts

    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    727229
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    Repeated assertion does not make the assertion true. Another logical fallacy, "proof by (repeated) assertion."



    "Reality" has nothing to do with the onus being on you to prove that the images/video are CGI, which you still have yet to do.



    So you are unable to answer a question unless there's a point to it?

    Just answer the question and we can move on.
    If you can't see something as simple as the image being CGI, you and I have nowhere to move on to.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to 1Mind1Spirit For Your Post:

    patrick jane (April 16th, 2018)

  11. #188
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,273
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    Nope, all one has to do is fall back on the unknown properties of refraction.
    Yes, your appeal to magic while denying fairly basic science is just what the conspiracy theory calls for in this case.

    Keep up the good work.

    Stuart

  12. #189
    Over 5000 post club 1Mind1Spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks
    780
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 1,097 Posts

    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    727229
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuu View Post
    Yes, your appeal to magic while denying fairly basic science is just what the conspiracy theory calls for in this case.

    Keep up the good work.

    Stuart
    The irony.

  13. #190
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,273
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    The irony.
    I know.

    Stuart

  14. #191
    Over 2000 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks
    473
    Thanked 424 Times in 296 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203711
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit View Post
    The irony.
    The utter stupidity.

  15. #192
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    33,411
    Thanks
    18,066
    Thanked 16,568 Times in 13,014 Posts

    Blog Entries
    32
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    0
    The indoctrination. The denial of reality.

  16. #193
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    19,170
    Thanks
    3,459
    Thanked 21,711 Times in 12,628 Posts

    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147813
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick jane View Post
    The indoctrination. The denial of reality.
    There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    1Mind1Spirit (April 19th, 2018),patrick jane (April 19th, 2018),Tambora (May 16th, 2018)

  18. #194
    Member of the 10 year club on TOL!! CabinetMaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    On the back of a horse someplace in Colorado
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked 666 Times in 469 Posts

    Blog Entries
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    285984
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
    Common sense is one of the most uncommon things in the universe.
    Galatians 5:22-23 (New International Version)

    But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.

    What are my fruits today?

    Cityboy With Horses A blog about what happens when you say, "I Promise"

    "Moral standards" are a lot like lighthouses: they exist to help us stay on course as we sail through life. But we have to steer BY them, but not directly AT them. Lest we end up marooned on the shoals of perpetual self-righteousness.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to CabinetMaker For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (April 19th, 2018)

  20. #195
    Over 2000 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,057
    Thanks
    473
    Thanked 424 Times in 296 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203711
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    There is a boat load of common sense evidence pointing toward a flat plane...more than a curved surface. If anyone should be wearing tin foil hats, it's them.
    Try reading the OP.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us