User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Past and present implications of "...require his blood at YOUR hands" (Eze 3:16-22)

  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Chillicothe (southern) Ohio
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    4434

    Past and present implications of "...require his blood at YOUR hands" (Eze 3:16-22)

    Ezekiel 3:16-21

    16 Now it came to pass at the end of seven days that the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore hear a word from My mouth, and give them warning from Me: 18 When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked manshall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. 19 Yet, if you warn the wicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul.
    20 “Again, when a righteous man turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die; because you did not give him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he has done shall not be remembered; but his blood I will require at your hand. 21 Nevertheless if you warn the righteous man that the righteous should not sin, and he does not sin, he shall surely live because he took warning; also you will have delivered your soul.”

    I have pondered the gravity of this passage for several years, particularly the ominous conclusion of verse 18, “...his blood I will require at your hand.” I don't know what that entails, but it sounds in no way good. The conclusion of verse19 is framed in more positive terms, but equal in gravity, “...you (the messenger) have delivered your soul.” The same severe phrase is echoed at the end of verse 20 and rescue offered again in verse 21.
    Given that the prophet had been sent to warn “the House of Israel”, is the first dire clause perhaps a reference to the several transgressions of the Law which required stoning of an unrepentant sinner? If that is so, then how did a warning message which produced repentance also “deliver the soul” of the messenger?
    My ultimate concern is this; Did this admonition to warn sinners apply only to the recipients of Ezekiels preaching, or does it have application to modern Christians as well? So many things from the Old Testament are foreshadowings of later and even more substantial realities (i.e. the sacrifice of a lamb, entering into the Promised Land, Jonah “in the belly of the fish”, etc). Might it be that, should I remain silent in the face of sin now, there could come a future time when something severe would be required of me towards those whom I should have warned, but didn't? Does a Christian have a responsibility toward sinners that must be fulfilled, if not presently by warning them, then at the Judgement? I have some thoughts on the matter, but would like to hear from those who might bring other Scripture and/or insight to bear on this passage.

    Μαραναθα

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Greek2Me For Your Post:

    daqq (December 6th, 2017)

  3. #2
    Over 4000 post club daqq's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olam Haba
    Posts
    4,429
    Thanks
    899
    Thanked 1,210 Times in 946 Posts

    Mentioned
    166 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    219850
    It is all in the Testimony of the Messiah in the Gospel accounts and his explanations of who and what the house of Israel truly concerns. Messiah is the Savior of the body, it is a body-temple analogy, you are like the porter of the door while the House Master is as if away in a far journey. If you do not properly shepherd the lesser members of your household then they are like lost sheep without a shepherd. But there is so much scripture in trying to explain all of this I would basically need to take over your thread to explain it, (which I do not plan to do). The kingdom of Elohim is truly within you just as the Master says.

  4. #3
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    3980
    Quote Originally Posted by Greek2Me View Post
    Ezekiel 3:16-21

    16 Now it came to pass at the end of seven days that the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore hear a word from My mouth, and give them warning from Me: 18 When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked manshall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. 19 Yet, if you warn the wicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul.
    20 “Again, when a righteous man turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die; because you did not give him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he has done shall not be remembered; but his blood I will require at your hand. 21 Nevertheless if you warn the righteous man that the righteous should not sin, and he does not sin, he shall surely live because he took warning; also you will have delivered your soul.”

    I have pondered the gravity of this passage for several years, particularly the ominous conclusion of verse 18, “...his blood I will require at your hand.” I don't know what that entails, but it sounds in no way good. The conclusion of verse19 is framed in more positive terms, but equal in gravity, “...you (the messenger) have delivered your soul.” The same severe phrase is echoed at the end of verse 20 and rescue offered again in verse 21.
    Given that the prophet had been sent to warn “the House of Israel”, is the first dire clause perhaps a reference to the several transgressions of the Law which required stoning of an unrepentant sinner? If that is so, then how did a warning message which produced repentance also “deliver the soul” of the messenger?
    My ultimate concern is this; Did this admonition to warn sinners apply only to the recipients of Ezekiels preaching, or does it have application to modern Christians as well? So many things from the Old Testament are foreshadowings of later and even more substantial realities (i.e. the sacrifice of a lamb, entering into the Promised Land, Jonah “in the belly of the fish”, etc). Might it be that, should I remain silent in the face of sin now, there could come a future time when something severe would be required of me towards those whom I should have warned, but didn't? Does a Christian have a responsibility toward sinners that must be fulfilled, if not presently by warning them, then at the Judgement? I have some thoughts on the matter, but would like to hear from those who might bring other Scripture and/or insight to bear on this passage.

    Μαραναθα
    I believe it means what other versions have it read...the fault lies with you as well...both are guilty.

  5. #4
    Over 6000 post club genuineoriginal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    On a sea of glass mixed with fire in front of a throne.
    Posts
    6,971
    Thanks
    352
    Thanked 551 Times in 413 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    461293
    Quote Originally Posted by Greek2Me View Post
    Ezekiel 3:16-21

    16 Now it came to pass at the end of seven days that the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore hear a word from My mouth, and give them warning from Me: 18 When I say to the wicked, ‘You shall surely die,’ and you give him no warning, nor speak to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life, that same wicked manshall die in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at your hand. 19 Yet, if you warn the wicked, and he does not turn from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but you have delivered your soul.
    20 “Again, when a righteous man turns from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him, he shall die; because you did not give him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he has done shall not be remembered; but his blood I will require at your hand. 21 Nevertheless if you warn the righteous man that the righteous should not sin, and he does not sin, he shall surely live because he took warning; also you will have delivered your soul.”

    I have pondered the gravity of this passage for several years, particularly the ominous conclusion of verse 18, “...his blood I will require at your hand.” I don't know what that entails, but it sounds in no way good. The conclusion of verse19 is framed in more positive terms, but equal in gravity, “...you (the messenger) have delivered your soul.” The same severe phrase is echoed at the end of verse 20 and rescue offered again in verse 21.
    Given that the prophet had been sent to warn “the House of Israel”, is the first dire clause perhaps a reference to the several transgressions of the Law which required stoning of an unrepentant sinner? If that is so, then how did a warning message which produced repentance also “deliver the soul” of the messenger?
    "his blood I will require at your hand" means that Ezekiel would be committing murder in God's eyes by not giving the wicked the warning from God.
    "you have delivered your soul" means that Ezekiel would have no guilt in the death of the wicked because Ezekiel warned them as God commanded him to do.
    Learn to read what is written.

    _____
    The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
    ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to genuineoriginal For Your Post:

    glorydaz (December 7th, 2017)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us