User Tag List

Page 5 of 26 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 384

Thread: Acts 13-Interplanner's Continuous Rebellion

  1. #61
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,305
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096466
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    There are no such details in the passages I have listed 1000x times here. It's imaginary. I'm talking about those places where extended attention is given to the 2nd coming and beyond. Not soundbytes.
    What's imaginary is your believing you have listed passages 1000x here.

    You haven't posted more than five passages here, if that much - ever.

    Nevertheless, Rom. 5:8

  2. #62
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,305
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096466
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    If thou knewest the difference between the spirit of the new testament and the letter of the new testament, thou would not havest these major problems.
    That's "thou wouldst not have..."

  3. #63
    STAND UP Tambora's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    43,025
    Thanks
    130,412
    Thanked 38,465 Times in 23,915 Posts

    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)



    Rep Power
    2148078
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    He didn't.
    He won't.

    he took care of the land thing earlier.
    Nope.
    There has not yet been a time when the 2 kingdoms (northern and southern) were gathered back into the promised land, never to be uprooted again.


    This is about his not breaking the 'blessing to all nations.'
    That's another promise.
    None of the promises will be broken.


    Wish you were interested in what the NT is interested in.
    I am.
    I just don't limit myself to it.


    It automatically makes missions and mission things happen. Demanding a land promise never will.
    Scripture details the land promise, not me.
    When GOD promises real earthly land to Israel, believe it.

    God Bless America

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tambora For Your Post:

    patrick jane (September 3rd, 2017),Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),steko (September 6th, 2017)

  5. #64
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,452
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 665 Times in 585 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    Quote Originally Posted by Tambora View Post
    He won't.

    Nope.
    There has not yet been a time when the 2 kingdoms (northern and southern) were gathered back into the promised land, never to be uprooted again.


    That's another promise.
    None of the promises will be broken.


    I am.
    I just don't limit myself to it.


    Scripture details the land promise, not me.
    When GOD promises real earthly land to Israel, believe it.




    But it's a loose cannon if it is not guided by the NT last and finally. Heb 1. he has now spoken in his son, finally, in these last days. Nothing about such a restoration, just the two tribes/groups.
    Those tribes get their reunification in Christ.
    There won't be any validated re-operation of Judaism, so whatever you have in mind won't be validated by God because it is going to 'subject the son of God to disgrace all over again.'

    The promise thing is COMPLETED by the resurrection. so you are failing to help in the mission until you let go of this obsession and let the Gospel work on who it is supposed to.

    There is nothing spiritually mature about believing your doctrine.

    You have never said one positive thing about the resurrection-boosted mission. Show me. Now that you claim you are.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  6. #65
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,452
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 665 Times in 585 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    There are no such details in the passages I have listed 1000x times here. It's imaginary. I'm talking about those places where extended attention is given to the 2nd coming and beyond. Not soundbytes.




    There is no need for STP's 3 part solution because this world is destroyed to make place for the NHNE.

    I was told last week that 'a whole lot of history is going to take place before that.' Well, that's not what the list of 2nd coming passages say, that I have listed here 1000x. it's just in D'ist soundbytes and OT passages that are never discussed in the NT.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  7. #66
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,452
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 665 Times in 585 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    Quote Originally Posted by steko View Post
    I know the context, IP. The context is the resurrection as prophecied.

    However, the prophets speak of much more than the resurrection.

    Peter speaks of the same 'all' which I'm referring to in Acts 3:21.

    Act 3:21* Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.*


    ...which informs us that when Christ returns there will be more things fulfilled which were spoken by the prophets.

    By the way, you glommed on your own addition to the context when you said it meant Christ's 'enthronement', which the verse doesn't mention at all.




    The enthronement of Christ meant the resurrection as preached by Peter in Acts 2:30-31: the resurrection is the enthronement. That is 'his glory' in v26, as is found likewise in short summaries like I Tim 3:16. eph 1 echoes this.

    He does not cover anything about '2nd coming events' so-called when he says all. He means Christ would suffer and would be enthroned for doing so.

    Don't you see what happened in Acts 1. he taught all this and spoke about the kingdom of God and how it work through his mission. They were dull and asked a really stupid question and got rebuked: will you restore the kingdom to israel at this time?

    But all D'ism does not think 'it is not for you to know' was not a rebuke! How clever!

    But more to the 'all' point. We have Acts 26, where we read that Paul won't speak beyond what is in the Prophets and Moses:

    Christ would suffer
    be the first to rise from the dead
    would preach to his people and the nations.

    Dude, where's the Judaistic messianics? Is this why we have a whole theology school that was grounded in saying 'the Bible is several conflicting messages and you need D'ism to straighten it out' and which MAJORS on trying to figure out the times and seasons God has appointed, WHICH IS NOT FOR US TO KNOW?
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  8. #67
    TOL Subscriber glorydaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    17,650
    Thanks
    7,745
    Thanked 25,140 Times in 12,730 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147731
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    That cracks me up, bro - it really does

    One aspect of what is behind your conclusions about the brother himself just because his understanding so differs from our own, is how married you yourselves are - not only to your own errors, but to skirting them, and or taking personal offence, and going all hostile, when they are brought up.

    Nevertheless, Rom. 5:8
    You're simply an idiot. STP never takes personal offence of goes all hostile. You've gotten your face glued to a mirror, Danny Boy.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to glorydaz For Your Post:

    patrick jane (September 3rd, 2017),Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),Tambora (September 3rd, 2017)

  10. #68
    TOL Subscriber glorydaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    17,650
    Thanks
    7,745
    Thanked 25,140 Times in 12,730 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147731
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    lol - see what I mean - your (words) study approach is off.

    Rom. 5:8
    Your idiocy grows with every post. Are you taking IDIOT STEROIDS?

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to glorydaz For Your Post:

    Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),Tambora (September 3rd, 2017)

  12. #69
    TOL Subscriber glorydaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    17,650
    Thanks
    7,745
    Thanked 25,140 Times in 12,730 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147731
    Quote Originally Posted by Nang View Post
    The land promises were fulfilled in the days of Joshua,
    No, they weren't.

    Judges 2:20-23 And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel; and he said, Because that this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers, and have not hearkened unto my voice; 21 I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died: 22 That through them I may prove Israel, whether they will keep the way of the Lord to walk therein, as their fathers did keep it, or not. 23 Therefore the Lord left those nations, without driving them out hastily; neither delivered he them into the hand of Joshua.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to glorydaz For Your Post:

    Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),steko (September 3rd, 2017),Tambora (September 3rd, 2017)

  14. #70
    Silver Member Nang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    7,814
    Thanks
    1,183
    Thanked 2,230 Times in 1,608 Posts

    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    257368
    Quote Originally Posted by glorydaz View Post
    No, they weren't.

    Judges 2:20-23 And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel; and he said, Because that this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers, and have not hearkened unto my voice; 21 I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died: 22 That through them I may prove Israel, whether they will keep the way of the Lord to walk therein, as their fathers did keep it, or not. 23 Therefore the Lord left those nations, without driving them out hastily; neither delivered he them into the hand of Joshua.
    Joshua 1:2-6
    "The immutable God never learned anything and never changed his mind. He knew everything from eternity."

    " The difference between faith and saving faith are the propositions believed."
    Gordon H. Clark

    "If a man be lost, God must not have the blame for it; but if a man be saved, God must have the glory of it."
    Charles Spurgeon

  15. #71
    STAND UP Tambora's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    43,025
    Thanks
    130,412
    Thanked 38,465 Times in 23,915 Posts

    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)



    Rep Power
    2148078
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post


    My job is to believe what God has said, not become a mind reader.
    Absolutely.

    God Bless America

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Tambora For Your Post:

    steko (September 3rd, 2017)

  17. #72
    Silver Member Nang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    7,814
    Thanks
    1,183
    Thanked 2,230 Times in 1,608 Posts

    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    257368
    Quote Originally Posted by Tambora View Post
    Absolutely.
    What do you people think the Scriptures mean when they declare the sons of God have "the mind of Christ." I Corinthians 2:16b
    "The immutable God never learned anything and never changed his mind. He knew everything from eternity."

    " The difference between faith and saving faith are the propositions believed."
    Gordon H. Clark

    "If a man be lost, God must not have the blame for it; but if a man be saved, God must have the glory of it."
    Charles Spurgeon

  18. #73
    TOL Subscriber glorydaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    17,650
    Thanks
    7,745
    Thanked 25,140 Times in 12,730 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147731
    Quote Originally Posted by Nang View Post
    Joshua 1:2-6
    Read further. This is another case of the Jews failure to go in and actually possess the lands....which is why the quote I gave you previously is so important.

    Judges 1:27 Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

    28 And it came to pass, when Israel was strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute, and did not utterly drive them out.

    29 Neither did Ephraim drive out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer; but the Canaanites dwelt in Gezer among them.

    30 Neither did Zebulun drive out the inhabitants of Kitron, nor the inhabitants of Nahalol; but the Canaanites dwelt among them, and became tributaries.

    31 Neither did Asher drive out the inhabitants of Accho, nor the inhabitants of Zidon, nor of Ahlab, nor of Achzib, nor of Helbah, nor of Aphik, nor of Rehob:

    32 But the Asherites dwelt among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land: for they did not drive them out.

    33 Neither did Naphtali drive out the inhabitants of Bethshemesh, nor the inhabitants of Bethanath; but he dwelt among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land: nevertheless the inhabitants of Bethshemesh and of Bethanath became tributaries unto them.

  19. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to glorydaz For Your Post:

    Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),SaulToPaul (September 4th, 2017),steko (September 3rd, 2017)

  20. #74
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    He didn't. he took care of the land thing earlier. This is about his not breaking the 'blessing to all nations.' Wish you were interested in what the NT is interested in. It automatically makes missions and mission things happen. Demanding a land promise never will.
    made up
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    steko (September 6th, 2017)

  22. #75
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The point is the promise (even if a singularity) was completed by the resurrection. all theology has to switch to that.
    Totally made up.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Right Divider (September 6th, 2017),steko (September 6th, 2017)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us