User Tag List

Page 1 of 25 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 366

Thread: The essential irrationality of Dispensationalism

  1. #1
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,455
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 666 Times in 586 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158

    The essential irrationality of Dispensationalism

    STP is looking forward to the day when the Levitical sacrificial system is practiced exactly as it is supposed to be, (in the unintended compliment of D'ism thread). that is the opposite of what Hebrews says. I therefore believe D'ism to be as irrational as the secular social scientist who says "male and female genders are just social constructs to be overthrown."

    You want me to believe that Hebrews is only for Jews. Then you want me to believe that the new covenant is only for Jews. then, even though no one can miss that the new covenant in Christ is about the replacement of Judaism's worship and sacrifice system, I am supposed to believe that Hebrews is not for me AND (above) that every thing in the law will be practiced exactly.

    D'ism is therefore fundamentally irrational and made up.

    We are supposed to learn from it when things are shadows of Christ and when the reality of Christ has come. It has, Heb 9 and 10. They actually have no other topic.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  2. #2
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,331
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 669 Times in 491 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    STP is looking forward to the day when the Levitical sacrificial system is practiced exactly as it is supposed to be, (in the unintended compliment of D'ism thread). that is the opposite of what Hebrews says. I therefore believe D'ism to be as irrational as the secular social scientist who says "male and female genders are just social constructs to be overthrown."

    You want me to believe that Hebrews is only for Jews. Then you want me to believe that the new covenant is only for Jews. then, even though no one can miss that the new covenant in Christ is about the replacement of Judaism's worship and sacrifice system, I am supposed to believe that Hebrews is not for me AND (above) that every thing in the law will be practiced exactly.

    D'ism is therefore fundamentally irrational and made up.

    We are supposed to learn from it when things are shadows of Christ and when the reality of Christ has come. It has, Heb 9 and 10. They actually have no other topic.

    Hi and I believe that there will never be a SACRIFICIAL SYSTEM again as Jesus in Heb 9:15 paid for all the sacrifices and sins committed under the Old Covenant ALSO , because will never die for sins ever again !!

    Also because there is a New High Priest after the order of Melchisedec !!

    In the Millennial Kingdom there will be sacrifices as recorded in Ezek !!

    #1 The burnt offering Ezek 40 :39 43:24 43:7

    #2 , The sin offering Ezek 40:39

    #3, The trespass offering Ezk 46:20

    #4, The peace offering Ezek 43:27

    #5, The meal offering Ezek 44:29

    #6, The drink offering Ezek 45:17


    The Holy Spirit will shed light to his people Isa 11:9 !!

    The New Covenant CAN NOT be in operation today as Paul warned all in Gal 4:10 !!

    dan p

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to DAN P For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 28th, 2017)

  4. #3
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,455
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 666 Times in 586 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    Quote Originally Posted by DAN P View Post
    Hi and I believe that there will never be a SACRIFICIAL SYSTEM again as Jesus in Heb 9:15 paid for all the sacrifices and sins committed under the Old Covenant ALSO , because will never die for sins ever again !!

    Also because there is a New High Priest after the order of Melchisedec !!

    In the Millennial Kingdom there will be sacrifices as recorded in Ezek !!

    #1 The burnt offering Ezek 40 :39 43:24 43:7

    #2 , The sin offering Ezek 40:39

    #3, The trespass offering Ezk 46:20

    #4, The peace offering Ezek 43:27

    #5, The meal offering Ezek 44:29

    #6, The drink offering Ezek 45:17


    The Holy Spirit will shed light to his people Isa 11:9 !!

    The New Covenant CAN NOT be in operation today as Paul warned all in Gal 4:10 !!

    dan p





    So you are saying both things will happen, right.

    lol, Gal 4:10 is not a warning about the new covenant. It is in effect today and there are no days/ seasons/ sacrifices. Those people had put themselves back under the 1st covenant. You have no idea.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  5. #4
    Over 750 post club
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ol Misery (Missouri)
    Posts
    870
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 213 Times in 172 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    24788
    The question is, to what extent have the dispensationalists also put themselves under the Old Covenant.

    We have to notice that many of them demonstrate that they do not follow Christian morality very well.. And many of them show that they are addicted to a gaming form of the dialectic.

  6. #5
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,331
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 669 Times in 491 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    So you are saying both things will happen, right.

    lol, Gal 4:10 is not a warning about the new covenant. It is in effect today and there are no days/ seasons/ sacrifices. Those people had put themselves back under the 1st covenant. You have no idea.

    Hi and there is much more than what I wrote !!

    Gal 4:10 means that the Galatians were already in the PRESENT TENSE / PARATERO were OBSERVING Days , and Months , and Times and Years which all Jews did in their Worship !!

    This means there OBSERVING these things during UNDER the Dispensation of the Grace of God was wrong as the Mosic Law was just to be FAZED OUT as 2 Cor 3:13-16 says !!

    Care to comment on 2 Cor 3:13-16 , come on DOOOOOOOOO IT !!

    dan p

  7. #6
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,350
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 2,418 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1100283
    Quote Originally Posted by DAN P View Post
    Hi and there is much more than what I wrote !!

    Gal 4:10 means that the Galatians were already in the PRESENT TENSE / PARATERO were OBSERVING Days , and Months , and Times and Years which all Jews did in their Worship !!

    This means there OBSERVING these things during UNDER the Dispensation of the Grace of God !!

    dan p
    I'd be surprised if IP disagrees with that.

    Rom. 5:8

  8. #7
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,331
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 669 Times in 491 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    I'd be surprised if IP disagrees with that.

    Rom. 5:8
    Hi probably right and will never see if the Greek words YE OBSERVE is really in the PRESENT TENSE , O WELL !!

    If he believes this , he is just here as a DEVIL'S ADVOCATE !!

    dan p

  9. #8
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,331
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 669 Times in 491 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    I'd be surprised if IP disagrees with that.

    Rom. 5:8
    Hi probably right and will never see if the Greek words YE OBSERVE is really in the PRESENT TENSE , O WELL !!

    If he believes this , he is just here as a DEVIL'S ADVOCATE !!

    He should also know that it is in the MIDDLE VOICE and in the INDICATIVE MOOD and that it is a FACT !!

    The MIDDLE VOICE means that the Jews ( the subject ) are participating in the action of Gal 4:10 !!

    dan p

  10. #9
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,343
    Thanks
    3,060
    Thanked 19,381 Times in 11,268 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    STP is looking forward to the day when the Levitical sacrificial system is practiced exactly as it is supposed to be, (in the unintended compliment of D'ism thread). that is the opposite of what Hebrews says. I therefore believe D'ism to be as irrational as the secular social scientist who says "male and female genders are just social constructs to be overthrown."

    You want me to believe that Hebrews is only for Jews. Then you want me to believe that the new covenant is only for Jews. then, even though no one can miss that the new covenant in Christ is about the replacement of Judaism's worship and sacrifice system, I am supposed to believe that Hebrews is not for me AND (above) that every thing in the law will be practiced exactly.

    D'ism is therefore fundamentally irrational and made up.

    We are supposed to learn from it when things are shadows of Christ and when the reality of Christ has come. It has, Heb 9 and 10. They actually have no other topic.
    The Kingdom is prepared FOR some people who inherit it.
    Study your Bible, put down the slew of commentaries.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 28th, 2017),Right Divider (August 29th, 2017),Tambora (September 1st, 2017)

  12. #10
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,343
    Thanks
    3,060
    Thanked 19,381 Times in 11,268 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You want me to believe that Hebrews is only for Jews. Then you want me to believe that the new covenant is only for Jews. then, even though no one can miss that the new covenant in Christ is about the replacement of Judaism's worship and sacrifice system, I am supposed to believe that Hebrews is not for me AND (above) that every thing in the law will be practiced exactly.
    I would like for you to believe who God said the new covenant was for.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 28th, 2017),Right Divider (August 29th, 2017),Tambora (September 1st, 2017)

  14. #11
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,343
    Thanks
    3,060
    Thanked 19,381 Times in 11,268 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    STP is looking forward to the day when the Levitical sacrificial system is practiced exactly as it is supposed to be, (in the unintended compliment of D'ism thread). that is the opposite of what Hebrews says. I therefore believe D'ism to be as irrational as the secular social scientist who says "male and female genders are just social constructs to be overthrown."

    You want me to believe that Hebrews is only for Jews. Then you want me to believe that the new covenant is only for Jews. then, even though no one can miss that the new covenant in Christ is about the replacement of Judaism's worship and sacrifice system, I am supposed to believe that Hebrews is not for me AND (above) that every thing in the law will be practiced exactly.

    D'ism is therefore fundamentally irrational and made up.

    We are supposed to learn from it when things are shadows of Christ and when the reality of Christ has come. It has, Heb 9 and 10. They actually have no other topic.
    Tell us when you were EVER under the first covenant. Give us the details. We are still waiting.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (August 28th, 2017),Right Divider (August 29th, 2017),Tambora (September 1st, 2017)

  16. #12
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,343
    Thanks
    3,060
    Thanked 19,381 Times in 11,268 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by northwye View Post
    The question is, to what extent have the dispensationalists also put themselves under the Old Covenant.

    We have to notice that many of them demonstrate that they do not follow Christian morality very well.. And many of them show that they are addicted to a gaming form of the dialectic.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Tambora (September 1st, 2017)

  18. #13
    Silver Member Nang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    7,814
    Thanks
    1,183
    Thanked 2,230 Times in 1,608 Posts

    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    257369
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    Tell us when you were EVER under the first covenant. Give us the details. We are still waiting.
    Adam was given commands from God under Covenant in the garden. Adam represented the entire human race, so when Adam broke Covenant commands, sin was imputed to him and all his offspring .. including you and me.

    Such is the gravity of Federal Headship.

    And when Jesus Christ represented and justified His offspring, as their federal head on the cross, His righteousness was imputed to all the elect sons of God.

    Theology is very interesting. You should give it a study sometime . . .
    "The immutable God never learned anything and never changed his mind. He knew everything from eternity."

    " The difference between faith and saving faith are the propositions believed."
    Gordon H. Clark

    "If a man be lost, God must not have the blame for it; but if a man be saved, God must have the glory of it."
    Charles Spurgeon

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Nang For Your Post:

    Eagles Wings (August 29th, 2017)

  20. #14
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,343
    Thanks
    3,060
    Thanked 19,381 Times in 11,268 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Nang View Post
    Adam was given commands from God under Covenant in the garden. Adam represented the entire human race, so when Adam broke Covenant commands, sin was imputed to him and all his offspring .. including you and me.

    Such is the gravity of Federal Headship.

    And when Jesus Christ represented and justified His offspring, as their federal head on the cross, His righteousness was imputed to all the elect sons of God.

    Theology is very interesting. You should give it a study sometime . . .
    Made up.
    The Bible tells us when the first covenant was given, and Moses mediated it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Right Divider (August 29th, 2017),Tambora (September 1st, 2017)

  22. #15
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,455
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 666 Times in 586 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    But more directly, the Jews were under the first covenant and many other people under similar rules, making Paul create the expression in Col 2 and Gal4, the 'weak and miserable elements of the world' when referring to it.

    Even if you don't see Israel as an example of what would happen, it does not change that the new covenant was put in effect by Christ the Covenant for us. He is our representative. God treats us as though him. This is why it sounds that way in the gospel accounts in both Corinthian passages and why it is the eternal covenant.

    The obsession with Israel and the land misses the magnificence of it. And turns the Bible into a chopped up irrelevance in which some inside clique determines which books are for us or not.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Interplanner For Your Post:

    Eagles Wings (August 29th, 2017)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us