User Tag List

Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 815161718
Results 256 to 261 of 261

Thread: Three Men Marry (each other) in Colombia

  1. #256
    TOL Legend Arthur Brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Precariously balanced on top of a mineshaft
    Posts
    11,212
    Thanks
    4,339
    Thanked 3,959 Times in 2,639 Posts

    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147697
    Quote Originally Posted by ok doser View Post
    Consent, artie


    The topic is consent


    Do try to focus
    Eh, you're the one who 'revealed' your supposed interest - aka societal accepted pedophilia - so either get on with embarrassing yourself over not being able to justify that garbage or carry on with your usual boring antics...
    Well this is fun isn't it?


  2. #257
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,233
    Thanks
    1,297
    Thanked 4,317 Times in 3,247 Posts

    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147689
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Brain View Post
    Eh, you're the one who 'revealed' your supposed interest - aka societal accepted pedophilia ...
    In the context of consent, artie


    Do try to keep up

  3. #258
    Over 4000 post club glassjester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,561
    Thanks
    519
    Thanked 1,197 Times in 947 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    257235
    Quote Originally Posted by ok doser View Post
    If she does it for the purpose of obtaining semen for inseminating the cow, the law is not concerned that the bull can't consent

    If she does it for fun, then it's beastiality and the law charges her because the bull can't consent
    I wonder how the female consents to the next step in the process. Or is sexual reproduction somehow not part of "every" sexual operation?
    Your "catholic" is showing. - Sozo

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to glassjester For Your Post:

    ok doser (August 14th, 2017)

  5. #259
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,233
    Thanks
    1,297
    Thanked 4,317 Times in 3,247 Posts

    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147689
    Quote Originally Posted by glassjester View Post
    I wonder how the female consents to the next step in the process. Or is sexual reproduction somehow not part of "every" sexual operation?
    if i understand town's position (which is always difficult because he hates presenting his position clearly), the animals' inability to consent only matters when the "operation" is linked to the sexual gratification of the human


    iow, "every" really means "in a narrowly defined context"

  6. #260
    Over 4000 post club glassjester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,561
    Thanks
    519
    Thanked 1,197 Times in 947 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    257235
    Quote Originally Posted by ok doser View Post
    if i understand town's position (which is always difficult because he hates presenting his position clearly), the animals' inability to consent only matters when the "operation" is linked to the sexual gratification of the human


    iow, "every" really means "in a narrowly defined context"
    So then it has nothing to do with consent or the animal's rights - because the same act could be performed on the animal (the animal "suffers" the same "injustice"), and all that determines the legality of the action is the emotional state of the human.

    I don't think that's a tenable explanation.
    Your "catholic" is showing. - Sozo

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to glassjester For Your Post:

    ok doser (August 14th, 2017)

  8. #261
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,233
    Thanks
    1,297
    Thanked 4,317 Times in 3,247 Posts

    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    2147689
    Quote Originally Posted by glassjester View Post
    So then it has nothing to do with consent or the animal's rights - because the same act could be performed on the animal (the animal "suffers" the same "injustice"), and all that determines the legality of the action is the emotional state of the human.

    I don't think that's a tenable explanation.


    which is why he tends to pitch a hissy and stalk off in these situations

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us