User Tag List

Page 49 of 51 FirstFirst ... 39464748495051 LastLast
Results 721 to 735 of 757

Thread: How can there be a another Gospel based on Gal. 1:22 ? The faith Paul once destroy ?

  1. #721
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,297
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096465
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post


    Good luck getting through the tribulation, keeping your money, and entering the kingdom of Heaven.
    I won't be here; and luck will have nothing to do with it.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Danoh For Your Post:

    dodge (July 18th, 2017)

  3. #722
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by john w View Post
    Take it away, Gladys!
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Tambora (July 13th, 2017)

  5. #723
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    12,452
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 665 Times in 585 Posts

    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    198158
    The time of 'enormous upheaval' was in that generation after Jesus; that's what the text says. The NT is not a 'code' full of D'ism that a few expert amateurs on the internet must be asked about.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  6. #724
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The time of 'enormous upheaval' was in that generation after Jesus; that's what the text says. The NT is not a 'code' full of D'ism that a few expert amateurs on the internet must be asked about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Tambora (August 6th, 2017)

  8. #725
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    few expert amateurs on the internet
    Thick thick thick thick irony...
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Right Divider (July 17th, 2017),Tambora (August 6th, 2017)

  10. #726
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,316
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 653 Times in 483 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    Hi and do you means , 2 Cor 3:13-17 ?

    And as A Greek AMATEUR , SCHOLAR what does that passage mean ??

    You NEVER answer how a person is saved in a 1P 1P , why is that ??

    I know you do not like me ? O WELL !!


    Here is and easy one , do you have a verse , as to when you were baptized , be careful , now !!

    dan p

  11. #727
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    18,339
    Thanks
    3,055
    Thanked 19,365 Times in 11,265 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147797
    Quote Originally Posted by DAN P View Post
    Hi and do you means , 2 Cor 3:13-17 ?

    And as A Greek AMATEUR , SCHOLAR what does that passage mean ??

    You NEVER answer how a person is saved in a 1P 1P , why is that ??

    I know you do not like me ? O WELL !!


    Here is and easy one , do you have a verse , as to when you were baptized , be careful , now !!

    dan p
    I think you haveth me confused with Interplanner.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Right Divider (July 17th, 2017),Tambora (August 6th, 2017)

  13. #728
    Over 5000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    5,316
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 653 Times in 483 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    202742
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    I think you haveth me confused with Interplanner.

    Hi and you are correct , sorry , about that !!

    dan p

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to DAN P For Your Post:

    SaulToPaul (July 17th, 2017)

  15. #729
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,297
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096465
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    How can there be a another Gospel based on Gal. 1:22-23 ? The faith Paul once destroy ?

    Gal 1:22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:
    Gal 1:23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.

    If Paul preached the faith He once destroyed, how can it be a "different gospel"?


    It is obvious to any one not caught up in the errors of MAD that MAD is a twist and out of context acceptance of what scripture does NOT teach.
    Of the various Bible Study Principles evident in Scripture Itself: A simple one is touched on in the following passages...

    Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

    "For (all) this...is briefly comprehended in this (one) saying..."

    You see that?

    He is basing his understanding of one thing on the principle of understanding various of it's components and how they contribute to the proper understanding of the one, and vice-versa.

    You don't do that.

    Instead, you base your conclusions on one or two seemingly related passages, when you do even that much.

    Within this obvious vacuum of yours (within what you have clearly failed to study out the various aspects of in more depth) your conclusions appear sound to you.

    But only to you.

    But sound, they are not.

    Your approach is as clearly unsound as Trump's continualy fool notion he can just wing his meetings with various foreign leaders.

    As with your false idol over in DC, you are only fooling yourself.

    Just about your every post reveals you are winging your conclusions, as you go along.

    Rom. 5:8
    Acts 17:11,12.

  16. #730
    Over 4000 post club dodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,649
    Thanks
    1,192
    Thanked 1,058 Times in 841 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    152247
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    Of the various Bible Study Principles evident in Scripture Itself: A simple one is touched on in the following passages...

    Romans 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

    "For (all) this...is briefly comprehended in this (one) saying..."

    You see that?

    He is basing his understanding of one thing on the principle of understanding various of it's components and how they contribute to the proper understanding of the one, and vice-versa.

    You don't do that.

    Instead, you base your conclusions on one or two seemingly related passages, when you do even that much.

    Within this obvious vacuum of yours (within what you have clearly failed to study out the various aspects of in more depth) your conclusions appear sound to you.

    But only to you.

    But sound, they are not.

    Your approach is as clearly unsound as Trump's continualy fool notion he can just wing his meetings with various foreign leaders.

    As with your false idol over in DC, you are only fooling yourself.

    Just about your every post reveals you are winging your conclusions, as you go along.

    Rom. 5:8
    Acts 17:11,12.
    NAh, winging it wwithout sound scriptural principles leads to:

    Denying Paul preached the same truth he once sought to destroy.

    Denying others were in Christ before Paul.

    Denying that Paul taught all the Apostles received the same truth from the Holy Spirit.

    Denying that "world" means world.

    Denying that " whosoever" means whosoever.

    Denying that "repentance" as taught by Jesus, Paul and all the Apostles means to repent.

    Denying the validity or necessity of baptism as taught and practiced by Jesus and everyone but one person in the NT is still valid today.

    Denying the "Lords's supper" which Jesus instituted and taught, and all the converts and Apostles taught and practiced as instructed by Jesus.

    MAD is pretty much a shell of true Christianity,sadly.
    Heb 4:2
    For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

  17. #731
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,297
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096465
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    NAh, winging it wwithout sound scriptural principles leads to:

    Denying Paul preached the same truth he once sought to destroy.

    Denying others were in Christ before Paul.

    Denying that Paul taught all the Apostles received the same truth from the Holy Spirit.

    Denying that "world" means world.

    Denying that " whosoever" means whosoever.

    Denying that "repentance" as taught by Jesus, Paul and all the Apostles means to repent.

    Denying the validity or necessity of baptism as taught and practiced by Jesus and everyone but one person in the NT is still valid today.

    Denying the "Lords's supper" which Jesus instituted and taught, and all the converts and Apostles taught and practiced as instructed by Jesus.

    MAD is pretty much a shell of true Christianity,sadly.
    As usual, just as "world" at times refers to "age" but you're off on that aspect, you're just as off on most of the above others.

    And for the record - AGAIN- only a very, very small fringe group within MAD deny the Lord's supper is for today. I, for one, do not belong to said denying "Hybrids."

    Not to mention other teachings on one thing or another such hold to not held by most MADs.

    But you must have your "one size fits all" as to all the above, so, no surprise on this issue either.

    Just shows once more, you wing your conclusions, as you go along

    Okay, I'm done - time for your Kellyanne Conway response, lol

    Rom. 5:8
    Acts 17:11,12.

  18. #732
    Over 4000 post club dodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,649
    Thanks
    1,192
    Thanked 1,058 Times in 841 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    152247
    Danoh;5077355]As usual, just as "world" at times refers to "age" but you're off on that aspect, you're just as off on most of the above others.
    Convenient that YOU get to decide who is in "world" in john 3:16
    And for the record - AGAIN- only a very, very small fringe group within MAD deny the Lord's supper is for today. I, for one, do not belong to said denying "Hybrids."
    MAD seems to be pretty much whoever in MAD wants it to be.


    But you must have your "one size fits all" as to all the above, so, no surprise on this issue either.
    Yep, that is pretty much what Christianity is in "one size fits all" one is either in Christ or not.

    Just shows once more, you wing your conclusions, as you go along
    Translated= I believe scripture and will not go down the roads that lead away from truth.

    Okay, I'm done - time for your Kellyanne response, lol
    Any response that proves MAD error meets the same hard hearted and blind response. Your loss not mine.
    Heb 4:2
    For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

  19. #733
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    13,297
    Thanks
    370
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 2,410 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    1096465
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    Convenient that YOU get to decide who is in "world" in john 3:16


    MAD seems to be pretty much whoever in MAD wants it to be.




    Yep, that is pretty much what Christianity is in "one size fits all" one is either in Christ or not.



    Translated= I believe scripture and will not go down the roads that lead away from truth.



    Any response that proves MAD error meets the same hard hearted and blind response. Your loss not mine.
    Yep, you winged your own on the spot notions into what I'd meant by that world/age example.

    Likewise as to the rest of my post, once more.

    You're simply not as sharp as you believe yourself to be.

    It is what it is.

    Rom. 5:8
    Acts 17:11,12

  20. #734
    Over 4000 post club dodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,649
    Thanks
    1,192
    Thanked 1,058 Times in 841 Posts

    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    152247
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    Yep, you winged your own on the spot notions into what I'd meant by that world/age example.

    Likewise as to the rest of my post, once more.

    You're simply not as sharp as you believe yourself to be.

    It is what it is.

    Rom. 5:8
    Acts 17:11,12
    I am sharp enough not to fall for the deception of MAD !
    Heb 4:2
    For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

  21. #735
    Over 2000 post club Eagles Wings's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    2,163
    Thanks
    4,677
    Thanked 1,823 Times in 1,201 Posts

    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    449858
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    I am sharp enough not to fall for the deception of MAD !
    Just popping in for a quick hello, dodge.

    I've learned much from these discussions.

    God bless you and keep you.
    Psalm 42:1-2 (KJV)

    1 As the hart panteth after the water brooks, so panteth my soul after thee, O God.

    2 My soul thirsteth for God, for the living God: when shall I come and appear before God?
    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us