User Tag List

Page 16 of 25 FirstFirst ... 613141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 371

Thread: Who actually revealed the "mystery" of the Gospel of grace ? Was Paul the first ?

  1. #226
    Over 3000 post club dodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,667
    Thanks
    940
    Thanked 850 Times in 677 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    103596
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    But if you read 3:5-6 closely and grammatically, it was not the FACT of the Gospel that was the mystery, nor the outreach to the nations. It call comes down to the prepositional phrase 'in the Gospel.' The mystery was that the fulfilled promises and benefits are true in the Gospel. Not in the Law, or you might say, not in the literal sense.

    You can check several trans and see that they are trying to put the weight of v6 on 'in the Gospel' as the Greek case shows. It is the same as saying 'in Christ.' Which is why the two are usually interchangeable.
    IP, Gen 3 was the first mention in scripture of the defeat of Satan, and that defeat only happened through Jesus,
    PJ said: "belief" in Jesus, is not Paul's gospel .
    How can there be a another Gospel based on Gal. 1:22-23 ? The faith Paul once destroy post#20.

  2. #227
    TOL Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    near Olympic National Park
    Posts
    10,133
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 495 Times in 443 Posts

    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    143829
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    IP, Gen 3 was the first mention in scripture of the defeat of Satan, and that defeat only happened through Jesus,


    OK...that is also why it would not be a mystery!

    What is mystery (to Judaism) in Eph 3:6 is that the sharing comes through the Gospel. The sharing of inheritance, membership. Not through the Law.

    Please remember: most of the NT is spoken to Judaism as it was at that time. That's why Paul was divinely arrested by God; because he was the spox at the time. And as you may notice: there is no small friction with Judaism.

    The redemption in the Gospel is no mystery.

    The fact that it would go to the nations is no mystery.

    That leaves only that the things shared, the co-inheritance, was to come through the Gospel, not the Law.
    All Lives Matter --Marcus Sanford, youtube.com

  3. #228
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    15,551
    Thanks
    2,272
    Thanked 13,842 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147763
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    Obfuscation is to put on cartoons when you mention that these things are fulfilled in Christ already. That's what STP has done dozens of times, and why he is on ignore to me. No one can do NT theology right when 'in Christ' is lost, abuse, ignored, mixed up.
    Clown.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    musterion (May 1st, 2017),Tambora (April 21st, 2017)

  5. #229
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    15,551
    Thanks
    2,272
    Thanked 13,842 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147763
    Quote Originally Posted by john w View Post
    Vs.


    Thanks again, for checkin' in.
    His posts on TOL are not "formal writing", saint john, and therefore exempt from grammatical analysis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Tambora (April 21st, 2017)

  7. #230
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    15,551
    Thanks
    2,272
    Thanked 13,842 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147763
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    OK...that is also why it would not be a mystery!

    What is mystery (to Judaism) in Eph 3:6 is that the sharing comes through the Gospel. The sharing of inheritance, membership. Not through the Law.

    Please remember: most of the NT is spoken to Judaism as it was at that time. That's why Paul was divinely arrested by God; because he was the spox at the time. And as you may notice: there is no small friction with Judaism.

    The redemption in the Gospel is no mystery.

    The fact that it would go to the nations is no mystery.

    That leaves only that the things shared, the co-inheritance, was to come through the Gospel, not the Law.
    There was a mystery hidden in the scriptures: That Christ would die for sins
    There was a mystery hidden in God: That Christ would die for those outside the covenant promises

    RD: "This isn't rocket surgery, or brain science."
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Tambora (April 21st, 2017)

  9. #231
    Over 2500 post club lifeisgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,657
    Thanks
    1,428
    Thanked 625 Times in 452 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    368264
    Quote Originally Posted by jamie View Post
    Really? What does the Bible say?

    Does the Bible say when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life?

    Is that what the Bible says?
    How 'bout starting here:

    ‘Without the Shedding of Blood There Is No Remission of Sins’ (Hebrews 9:11-28)

    If there is anything Satan hates, it is the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.
    No man can come to God except through Christ. (Jn. 14:20)
    No man can come to Christ unless he comes through the Cross. (Jn. 3:16; Eph. 2:13–18)
    No man can come to the Cross without a denial of self. (Lk. 9:23–24)

  10. #232
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,049
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 2,431 Times in 1,805 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    968970
    Quote Originally Posted by SaulToPaul View Post
    There was a mystery hidden in the scriptures: That Christ would die for sins
    There was a mystery hidden in God: That Christ would die for those outside the covenant promises

    RD: "This isn't rocket surgery, or brain science."
    Agh! A Hybrid!



    Where does Paul say that Christ would die for sins was hidden in the Scriptures?

    Likwise with your other assertion.

    Of course, heir will now come along and privately post a bit a vile my way

  11. #233
    The Dubious Toad is skeptical of your claim. musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    16,805
    Thanks
    2,355
    Thanked 10,154 Times in 6,062 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147692
    Instead of Danoh, your name should be Dymo, the labeler.

    You cannot convince me to your "your works cannot save you" corrupt doctrine.
    The Jehovah's Witnesses posting as "Meshak," 6:31 pm, 4/8/2017.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to musterion For Your Post:

    glorydaz (May 1st, 2017),Grosnick Marowbe (May 2nd, 2017),SaulToPaul (May 1st, 2017),Tambora (May 2nd, 2017)

  13. #234
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,049
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 2,431 Times in 1,805 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    968970
    Quote Originally Posted by musterion View Post
    Instead of Danoh, your name should be Dymo, the labeler.

    Lol

    And of course, the double-standard you and your club live by keeps you blind to one more obvious...

    The obvious that you too have just labled someone.

    Not too bright; are ya?


  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Danoh For Your Post:

    dodge (May 1st, 2017)

  15. #235
    The Dubious Toad is skeptical of your claim. musterion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    16,805
    Thanks
    2,355
    Thanked 10,154 Times in 6,062 Posts

    Blog Entries
    3
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147692
    I'll let Christ judge that.
    You cannot convince me to your "your works cannot save you" corrupt doctrine.
    The Jehovah's Witnesses posting as "Meshak," 6:31 pm, 4/8/2017.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to musterion For Your Post:

    Tambora (May 2nd, 2017)

  17. #236
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,049
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 2,431 Times in 1,805 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    968970
    Quote Originally Posted by musterion View Post
    I'll let Christ judge that.
    Lol - so you assert

  18. #237
    Over 3000 post club dodge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,667
    Thanks
    940
    Thanked 850 Times in 677 Posts

    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    103596
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    Lol - so you assert
    Kinda looks like the pharisees have kicked you out of their club, Danoh !

    Probably a good thing for you in the end game.
    PJ said: "belief" in Jesus, is not Paul's gospel .
    How can there be a another Gospel based on Gal. 1:22-23 ? The faith Paul once destroy post#20.

  19. #238
    Over 4000 post club
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    4,552
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 347 Times in 284 Posts

    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    160280
    Quote Originally Posted by Danoh View Post
    Agh! A Hybrid!



    Where does Paul say that Christ would die for sins was hidden in the Scriptures?

    Likwise with your other assertion.

    Of course, heir will now come along and privately post a bit a vile my way

    Hi and a HYBRID you say , and you are like the Acts 28er and do not know how Paul was saved !!

    So keep your smile while I kick you !!

    I wonder why that ACT 28 er left , as some will not take the HEAT !!

    dan p

  20. #239
    TOL Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    11,049
    Thanks
    369
    Thanked 2,431 Times in 1,805 Posts

    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    968970
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    Kinda looks like the pharisees have kicked you out of their club, Danoh !

    Probably a good thing for you in the end game.
    A long time ago, bro - thank God, lol

    2 Cor. 10:12

  21. #240
    Silver Member SaulToPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    15,551
    Thanks
    2,272
    Thanked 13,842 Times in 8,405 Posts

    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147763
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge View Post
    Kinda looks like the pharisees have kicked you out of their club, Danoh !

    Probably a good thing for you in the end game.
    It's of his own making. We've all tried to befriend him, but he'll have none of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    You're too literal to get it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interplanner View Post
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaulToPaul For Your Post:

    Grosnick Marowbe (May 2nd, 2017),Tambora (May 2nd, 2017)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us