Reply With QuoteArthur Brain (April 18th, 2017),Rusha (April 17th, 2017),WizardofOz (April 17th, 2017)
Originally Posted by intojoy
Hilarious. The guy is a homo! Come on man. No one acts the way dr ho did. I can't believe people give the guy sympathy at all. I would have punched him in the faceYou're sick.
So keep your candles burning
"Nevertheless, she persisted."
a.k.a. starchild, starburst, stardust, sweetpea, and dumber than dirt.
Arthur Brain (April 18th, 2017),Rusha (April 17th, 2017),WizardofOz (April 17th, 2017)
Were you trading for pills too?
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
Arthur Brain (April 18th, 2017),Rusha (April 17th, 2017)
Angel4Truth (April 17th, 2017)
"Don't do that" lol
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
No, I get mine free. Wizard of gaybob
Were you trading for pills too?
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
Why should the whole company shut down because of the idiot actions of a few?
A few (who lied and said he was disruptive) should be jailed for a false report to police and the ceo should resign for all his lies to the media and they should pay this man and his family out the tail because of their negligence. All employees involved, fired.
"Around the country, progressive bullies have attacked Christians for daring to put their faith ahead of the pet causes of those who feign compassion while destroying life-giving liberties. What we are seeing is a scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners approach as the wildfire burns across our land. It is not enough that Christians be quiet. Christians must be silenced and punished. Their faith cannot be respected. Legislation that ensures people are free to live and work according to their faith without fear of being punished by government must be stopped and decried as discrimination...There is one key reason that those on the Left must force their beliefs on the rest of us: if they didn't force their craziness on us, we would never embrace it." ~Erick Erickson
He was already boarded and he has already paid, its contract thing. Several of those workers should be jailed.
"Around the country, progressive bullies have attacked Christians for daring to put their faith ahead of the pet causes of those who feign compassion while destroying life-giving liberties. What we are seeing is a scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners approach as the wildfire burns across our land. It is not enough that Christians be quiet. Christians must be silenced and punished. Their faith cannot be respected. Legislation that ensures people are free to live and work according to their faith without fear of being punished by government must be stopped and decried as discrimination...There is one key reason that those on the Left must force their beliefs on the rest of us: if they didn't force their craziness on us, we would never embrace it." ~Erick Erickson
fool (April 17th, 2017)
Yeah, boarded and paid or not....all passengers are subject to the authority of the captain and his crew. Were it not so, then we could have anarchy on board. It's actually in the contract that the airlines can remove any passenger they want for any reason they want.
They handled it badly, but they did have the authority to demand a paying customer deplane....for whatever reason they chose. They will certainly lose a lot of money because they could have handled it better, but I don't think they broke any laws.
So if the captain said strip everyone should do it? The last part in bold is false. There are specific guidelines that must occur to remove a paid customer from a flight, which is WHY in this case, the airline lied to aviation authorities and claimed they had a disruptive, beligerant passenger, because that is basis for removal.
thats an understatement.They handled it badly
No, they had the authority to reject boarding, not to remove for any reason they feel like. The plane was already boarded, and thats why they lied at first and said it was overbooked,and then said a dangerous passenger was on board when it wasnt.but they did have the authority to demand a paying customer deplane....for whatever reason they chose.
There would be no basis for a lawsuit, if a law wasnt broken.They will certainly lose a lot of money because they could have handled it better, but I don't think they broke any laws.
"Around the country, progressive bullies have attacked Christians for daring to put their faith ahead of the pet causes of those who feign compassion while destroying life-giving liberties. What we are seeing is a scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners approach as the wildfire burns across our land. It is not enough that Christians be quiet. Christians must be silenced and punished. Their faith cannot be respected. Legislation that ensures people are free to live and work according to their faith without fear of being punished by government must be stopped and decried as discrimination...There is one key reason that those on the Left must force their beliefs on the rest of us: if they didn't force their craziness on us, we would never embrace it." ~Erick Erickson
That's what needs to happen, they need to be made an example of.
This was against their own Terms of Service.
He was not "Involuntarily Denied Boarding" as the CEO implied and that was stupid of him to say. The man was clearly boarded and seated which crosses an important line. All the boarding/not boarding stuff happens at the gate. And then they didn't follow their own protocol to get volunteers to not board after they had screwed up and boarded them.
Now don't get me wrong, I love watching hippies get pepper sprayed and rioters getting throat slammed but after seeing this I actually Googled up the Terms of Service and spent some time reading them. I don't see how they ever got to the point of considering this. That ship had sailed.
Angel4Truth (April 17th, 2017),ok doser (April 18th, 2017)
"Around the country, progressive bullies have attacked Christians for daring to put their faith ahead of the pet causes of those who feign compassion while destroying life-giving liberties. What we are seeing is a scorched-earth, take-no-prisoners approach as the wildfire burns across our land. It is not enough that Christians be quiet. Christians must be silenced and punished. Their faith cannot be respected. Legislation that ensures people are free to live and work according to their faith without fear of being punished by government must be stopped and decried as discrimination...There is one key reason that those on the Left must force their beliefs on the rest of us: if they didn't force their craziness on us, we would never embrace it." ~Erick Erickson
ok doser (April 18th, 2017)
Well, the captain may have to require everyone strip for some reason we don't know of. They may have been informed that someone had smuggled seran gas in the hems of their clothing.
Their authority doesn't end at the boarding gate. A passenger can fail to obey a direct order mid flight and they have the authority to use any means necessary to gain compliance. They've had to physically restrain people lots of times.No, they had the authority to reject boarding, not to remove for any reason they feel like. The plane was already boarded, and thats why they lied at first and said it was overbooked,and then said a dangerous passenger was on board when it wasnt.
Of course there would be...a civil suit. Just plain old embarrassment would be a case if they got a liberal jury.There would be no basis for a lawsuit, if a law wasnt broken.
Because they're responsible for them.
Anarchy is what they had alright.Were it not so, then we could have anarchy on board.
No, the circumstances are clearly spelled out and this didn't meet any of them.It's actually in the contract that the airlines can remove any passenger they want for any reason they want.
They already painted themselves into a corner, once they gave him a seat and boarded him.
They could have not boarded him at the gate. Once they boarded him, they boarded him.
He's been boarded.
He didn't climb thru the window.
He didn't shinny up the landing gear.
He was voluntarily boarded by the airline.
What happened to him next was he was De-planed.
You can't try to retroactively deny someone boarding by de-planing them.
The two things have different names because they are different things.
No they didn't. You can't say there's no food so we have to eat passenger 23a.They handled it badly, but they did have the authority to demand a paying customer deplane....for whatever reason they chose.
The Captain is supposed to fight to the hilt to defend his passenger against those that would eat him.
They broke all the laws. It will only matter if we make it matter.They will certainly lose a lot of money because they could have handled it better, but I don't think they broke any laws.
Angel4Truth (April 18th, 2017)
But it's too late to tell that lie, we know that wasn't the reason.
The responsibility shifts to the Captain.Their authority doesn't end at the boarding gate.
What they did was outside of the lines.A passenger can fail to obey a direct order mid flight and they have the authority to use any means necessary to gain compliance. They've had to physically restrain people lots of times.
Conservatives don't like getting selected by the thug squad either.Of course there would be...a civil suit. Just plain old embarrassment would be a case if they got a liberal jury.
Angel4Truth (April 18th, 2017)
No al sharpton for dr ho huh? I thought gays were co recipients of discrimination.
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
