glorydaz (March 20th, 2017)
Some Who Helped Get Trump Elected Are Being Attacked
Roger Stone was hit by a hit and run car apparently deliberately recently and earlier there was an attempt to poison him. Michael Savage was physically attacked near San Francisco in March of 2017 though not seriously injured, as a 74 or 75 year old. Roger Stone is 64 or 65. Both helped get Trump elected.
Wikipedia says of Roger Stone that "Stone "has a reputation for sartorial elegance" and does not wear socks..." But Roger Stone is a Yankee who gives us a lot of interesting inside information on the American political culture - including its dark side - in the last 40 years or more, and how it was that in 2016 something of the best of John Knox, Samuel Rutherford, John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington. James Madison, and Andrew Jackson came back to life. Many in American politics do not like it that something from these guys came back to life in November of 2016 and some seem they are not limiting their opposition to talk.
Michael Savage wrote a book called Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder.
Liberals are a big pain!
Who benefits from preventing Roger Stone testifying - not the Democrats!
The Trump Administration and the Russians have most to gain from silencing Stone.
Given that Stone, like Trump, wants to be the center of attention, he is "milking" this incident beyond that which the facts would warrant!
I don't believe him, for one simple reason: He is now alive, and not in isolation to prevent a fatal infection due to his destroyed immune system. Also, polonium is expensive, around $9,000 for a minimal fatal dose, which isn't an amount that just anyone can drop on an assassination. And he's offered no evidence to support the claim. And Stone is a deliberate, proven conspiracy-monger.
Global warming denialists are like gravity denialists piloting a helicopter, determined to prove a point. We may not have time to actually persuade them of their mistake.
And the quarrel here on QUARREL, using the Marxist version of he dialectic, goes on and on and on. The purpose of the Marxist dialectic is not to arrive at Truth, but to overthrow the Thesis, which can be anything that is established, is of God and is intended to be absolute like Christian morality. The Anti-thesis opposes that which is established, is of God or absolute such as the Western culture which was derived from Biblical Christianity and the family, and is against Marxism
"In the eyes of the dialectical philosophy, nothing is established for
all time, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx)
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29. Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers," Romans 1: 28-29
Debate is from eris, number 2054, "a quarrel, wrangling, contention,debate, strife, variance."
Quarreling is an accurate English word for eris. Some kinds of
statements invite a quarrel more than other kinds of statements. And
quarreling is an indication of a reprobate mind in Romans 1:28-29.
Paul uses a different Greek word in I Timothy 6: 3-4,
logomachia, "If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome
words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine
which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but
doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy,
strife, railings, evil surmisings."
What Paul is saying is that those
who get off into doctrines that were not taught by Christ and the
Apostles tend to get into logomachia, or strifes of words."
Logomachia is number 3055 in Strong's and is said to mean
"disputations, strife of words." Logomachia might be translated as
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)