User Tag List

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 152

Thread: Battle Royale VIII applicants wanted!

  1. #46
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: Re: debating

    Originally posted by Knight

    Wouldn't you do the same?

    After all... perfect exhaustive foreknowledge is by definition perfect... right
    I think you asked add this question but I would like to throw my two cents in, if you don't mind.

    Strictly speaking Armenians are closed theist but only because they are afraid to suggest that God doesn't know the future. The Open View seems to me to be a subset of Armenianism in many repsects although I definately do not consider myself an Armenian. I guess the point I'm driving at is that a debate between an Armenian and an Open Theist would not have the scope that it might otherswise have because there are more points of agreement between them than there are points of disagreement.

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  2. #47
    ...then I woke up. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,925
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 2,335 Times in 1,100 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1097775

    Re: Re: Re: debating

    Originally posted by Clete Pfeiffer

    I think you asked add this question but I would like to throw my two cents in, if you don't mind.

    Strictly speaking Armenians are closed theist but only because they are afraid to suggest that God doesn't know the future. The Open View seems to me to be a subset of Armenianism in many repsects although I definately do not consider myself an Armenian. I guess the point I'm driving at is that a debate between an Armenian and an Open Theist would not have the scope that it might otherswise have because there are more points of agreement between them than there are points of disagreement.
    I agree mostly with what you are saying.

    The bottom line is Arminians claim an open view but preach a closed view.

    I think most Arminians don't realize how much they have in common with Calvinsts.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

  3. #48
    Journeyman add yasaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203

    kids today

    IYGTTUAS quote -- Ever read Beyond the Bounds?

    No, but I have read some of Piper's thoughts on it. Instead of worrying about how he thinks this will affect the church, he should spend more time exegeting.



    Knight quote - Wouldn't you do the same?

    After all... perfect exhaustive foreknowledge is by definition perfect... right?


    Knight, this is where you show your ignorance. Modern Arminians, esp. have no set in stone definition of foreknowledge, as is evident when you read F. Leroy Forline's "The Quest for Truth". And so, my spacetime theory where God manipulates spacetime would still be Arminian.

    "perfect exhaustive foreknowledge" if one defines it as "certain foreknowledge" then there is no problem. Even if God was able to see all times at once, he sees the past as past, the present as present, and the future as future. Depending on how he sees all these things, you could argue that he blocks out the past and present from view. Also, God seeing future things is the same as Him seeing Past things. So, his seeing them has no effect on their freedom.

  4. #49
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: Re: Re: Re: debating

    Originally posted by Knight

    I agree mostly with what you are saying.

    The bottom line is Arminians claim an open view but preach a closed view.

    I think most Arminians don't realize how much they have in common with Calvinsts.
    You are definately right! But that's why I think that the debate should be against a Calvinist or a Catholic or something that is more clearly antithetical to the closed view. The distiction is much clearer and a Calvinist would be able to be more consistant in his argumentation.

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  5. #50
    ...then I woke up. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,925
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 2,335 Times in 1,100 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1097775

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: debating

    Originally posted by Clete Pfeiffer

    You are definately right! But that's why I think that the debate should be against a Calvinist or a Catholic or something that is more clearly antithetical to the closed view. The distiction is much clearer and a Calvinist would be able to be more consistant in his argumentation.
    That's very true.

    As evidenced by....
    "perfect exhaustive foreknowledge" if one defines it as "certain foreknowledge" then there is no problem. Even if God was able to see all times at once, he sees the past as past, the present as present, and the future as future. Depending on how he sees all these things, you could argue that he blocks out the past and present from view. Also, God seeing future things is the same as Him seeing Past things. So, his seeing them has no effect on their freedom.

    - add yasaf
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

  6. #51
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: debating


    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  7. #52
    Journeyman add yasaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203

    who the

    OOOh. error I meant blocking the past and future from view.


    Clete quote - The distiction is much clearer and a Calvinist would be able to be more consistant in his argumentation.


    Every Arminian has a view of what they think foreknowledge is, so in their own way they would be consistent.

  8. #53
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: who the

    Originally posted by add yasaf
    Clete quote - The distiction is much clearer and a Calvinist would be able to be more consistant in his argumentation.


    Every Arminian has a view of what they think foreknowledge is, so in their own way they would be consistent.
    Perhaps, but not as consistant. And the distinctions aren't nearly are profound.

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  9. #54
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776
    Knight,

    Based on this...

    Originally posted by Knight

    Lion... POTD
    I nominate Lion to argue the Open View!

    Clete

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  10. #55
    Journeyman add yasaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203

    crazy kids

    Clete quote - Perhaps, but not as consistant. And the distinctions aren't nearly are profound.


    If they are not as consistent, you would have to prove that, not just say it. Listen, if Knight is going to lump us in there, I think it is only fair that if an able person of that ilk is available, they should be given a fair chance. Also since I have read more Calvinist books and am going to the premier Reformed seminary in the world, I could argue from that angle also.

  11. #56
    Journeyman add yasaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203

    no way hosea

    quote:
    Originally posted by Knight

    Lion... POTD

    I nominate Lion to argue the Open View!

    Clete


    Based on my reply...http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...157#post436157
    and the whole previous discussion with Lion, and the fact that he/she doesn't know Hebrew, I definitely don't nominate Lion!

  12. #57
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: no way hosea

    Originally posted by add yasaf

    quote:
    Originally posted by Knight

    Lion... POTD

    I nominate Lion to argue the Open View!

    Clete


    Based on my reply...http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...157#post436157
    and the whole previous discussion with Lion, and the fact that he/she doesn't know Hebrew, I definitely don't nominate Lion!

    I don't know a thing about Hebrew and you nominated me!

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  13. #58
    Journeyman add yasaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    203

    whoa nelly

    Clete quote - I don't know a thing about Hebrew and you nominated me!


    I was taking what I thought was the best representative from this site. You are more consistent than Lion overall. I don't believe that there is anyone else here who is an open theist and knows Biblical Hebrew anyways. PLUS, I was referring more to Lion's post, which made it glaringly obvious that he/she doesn't know it. I wasn't sure if you knew Hebrew or not, Clete.

    Now if I were to go outside the site here, my pick would be Greg Boyd.

  14. #59
    Silver Member Clete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Seated in the heavenly places at God's right hand, in Him!
    Posts
    9,686
    Thanks
    661
    Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,706 Posts

    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rep Power
    2147776

    Re: whoa nelly

    Originally posted by add yasaf
    Now if I were to go outside the site here, my pick would be Greg Boyd.
    Me too!

    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

  15. #60
    ...then I woke up. Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    26,925
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 2,335 Times in 1,100 Posts

    Blog Entries
    6
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    1097775
    Originally posted by Clete Pfeiffer

    Knight,

    Based on this...



    I nominate Lion to argue the Open View!

    Clete
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us