Another tally of anti-trinitarian threads

[Lon]

Let him who hath not sinned cast the first stone.

Such is within reasonable discussion of this thread. Who is it that casts the 'first' stone? Trinitarians on a Trinitarian board?

[Lon]

Show me where I use "eggs" "pink" etc.

Your dishonesty is showing.

If you could show me "trinity, triune, three in one, God the Son, mother of God, hypostatic union, dual nature, God-man" from scripture, but like I said, your fairy tale mentality is showing.

I had the old thread deleted, but do you realize you said nearly the exact same thing last time? You don't like another's summary of your threads, but that is what they amount to, dishonesty? My honest assessment, whether you like it or not.

[keypurr]

Such is within reasonable discussion of this thread. Who is it that casts the 'first' stone? Trinitarians on a Trinitarian board?

Most likely, You Lon.

[Bright Raven]

Most likely, You Lon.

Getting a little testy?

[Lon]

Most likely, You Lon.

Really? You are the nice guy that never shakes the tree or rocks the boat arguing with a Trinitarian on his/her board? And trinitarians don't return the favor and spam up the JW board (thus only defending against stone throwing here? You really think that's me casting the first one?

Most likely you Lon.

Er, I mean both the first stone and the second stone?

Do you realize whose property your rock throwing is on? Whose windows?

Most likely, You Lon.

Are you sure?

[patrick jane]

Let him who hath not sinned cast the first stone.

Why don't you be happy and content with your opinion and keep it to yourself ? Just because you're wrong doesn't mean you should attempt to mock the Bible.

[steko]

Didn't even compute..... did it?

Right over his head.

[Bright Raven]

Why don't you be happy and content with your opinion and keep it to yourself ? Just because you're wrong doesn't mean you should attempt to mock the Bible.

One of the better responses I have seen.

[oatmeal]

Please leave this thread, you have plenty.

Please show me scripture that shows me that I am wrong.

Please show me scripture that shows where God defines himself by terms and phrases like "trinity, triune, three in one, dual nature, God man, God the Son, hypostatic union, fully God/fully man..."

You can't?

Why do you suppose He doesn't?

Not good enough vocabulary?

God has described himself perfectly and does not use your trinitarian terminology to do so.

Maybe you should get honest and admit that God is right not to use those terms.

[oatmeal]

You're another heretic TOL can do nicely without.

God's word is truth. John 17:17, not your baseless opinions.

If this thread is not about theology, then why name it so?

Of course, maybe your theology has nothing to do with scripture?

[oatmeal]

Seems plain to one who is blind. That would be you.

Show me my error.

You cannot.

[oatmeal]

I had the old thread deleted, but do you realize you said nearly the exact same thing last time? You don't like another's summary of your threads, but that is what they amount to, dishonesty? My honest assessment, whether you like it or not.

Thanks, but I will take the scriptural brand of honesty, not yours.

[Lon]

Thanks, but I will take the scriptural brand of honesty, not yours.

This isn't really talking about 'a colored egg' is it?

And all of this just to banter over 'an assessment' summary of your thread that doesn't make a whole lot of beans one way or the other. Are you not contentious? 1 Corinthians 3:3

[Zeke]

The last time I tallied these, the number was well over 130 threads against a Trinitarian view.

After all of them were deleted, it is surprising to see how quickly they are rejuvenated.

This is not a 'debate the trinity' thread. It is a thread specifically about the number of threads and why they exist, as well as a reference tool.

1. ECT- A pink egg isn't a blue egg -can't be an egg, & Jesus cannot be God -Oatmeal
2.A pink egg isn't an egg and Jesus can't be God (2) -Oatmeal
3. Jesus isn't God - Elia
4. Jesus isn't the Messiah - Elia
5. Jesus can't be Y-H-W-H or he'd be praying to Himself -Elia
6. There are two gods -October23

I know you like being the thought police along with a few other puritans but this is the religious section after all, in the which the trinity is far game.

[patrick jane]

I know you like being the thought police along with a few other puritans but this is the religious section after all, in the which the trinity is far game.

It's not far game, neither is it fair game. This thread is NOT for debating the Trinity, period. It's no wonder your doctrine is false, you can't even comprehend the OP.