User Tag List

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 112

Thread: Real Science Radio: Now, Every (Comet) Scientist Works for Walt Brown!

  1. #91
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    15,138
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 7,325 Times in 5,838 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147791
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    God poofs it into existence.
    Nope.

    You're not very good at this whole "conversation" stuff are you? It's always either a link or nonsense from you.
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (September 28th, 2017),Tambora (November 3rd, 2016)

  3. #92
    Over 2000 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,083
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 533 Times in 364 Posts

    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    224035
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    Nope.
    Then please explain.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jonahdog For Your Post:

    User Name (November 1st, 2016)

  5. #93
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    15,138
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 7,325 Times in 5,838 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147791
    Who are you?
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    Tambora (November 3rd, 2016)

  7. #94
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    15,138
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 7,325 Times in 5,838 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147791
    Did yous figure out how deuterium is formed yet?
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.


  8. #95
    Over 1500 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 246 Times in 178 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    144636
    Quote Originally Posted by The Barbarian View Post
    The solid, core structure of a comet is known as the nucleus. Cometary nuclei are composed of an amalgamation of rock, dust, water ice, and frozen gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, and ammonia.[12] As such, they are popularly described as "dirty snowballs" after Fred Whipple's model. However, some comets may have a higher dust content, leading them to be called "icy dirtballs"
    Anyone who is interested can now take a closer look at that:

    .


    Pause as desired for a detailed look.

  9. #96
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    15,138
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 7,325 Times in 5,838 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147791
    Anyone who is interested can take a closer look at that:

    http://kgov.com/origin-of-comets

    Sent from my SM-A520F using TOL mobile app
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (September 28th, 2017)

  11. #97
    Over 2000 post club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    2,083
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 533 Times in 364 Posts

    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    224035
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    Anyone who is interested can take a closer look at that:

    http://kgov.com/origin-of-comets

    Sent from my SM-A520F using TOL mobile app
    Only if you do not want accuracy.

  12. #98
    Over 3000 post club gcthomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,868
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 773 Times in 521 Posts

    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    416901
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonahdog View Post
    Only if you do not want accuracy.
    Quite. There are no mathematical models detailing how he works out the orbits that can be reached from that singular event, and how their orbits are changed to their current parameters. There is no explanation how the very long period comets could have come back quite so quickly, or whether when the first hyperbolic comet is discovered that will be a valid disproof on top of its failure to accurately predict anything about the solar system.

    It a woolly,post hoc and vague justification of his odd biblical fundamentalist literalism. I suspect even Brown himself doesn't really think it is a good model, but it is all he has.
    We wunt be druv.

    Self appointed representative of the reality based community. [Send complaints to /dev/null.]

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to gcthomas For Your Post:

    User Name (September 26th, 2017)

  14. #99
    Over 5000 post club The Barbarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,606
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 661 Times in 456 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    186104
    Quote Originally Posted by gcthomas View Post
    There is no explanation how the very long period comets could have come back quite so quickly
    That's the killer for Walt's story. How do we see a comet with a period of millions of years, returning in a solar system only a few thousand years old?

    And yes, Kepler's laws rule out any shorter period for them.
    Let's say that I suffer from a delusion. I will call this delusion "Fact-check Syndrome." I respond by citing facts.

    Most people online don't want to be corrected. They do not care about anything that does not agree with them.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to The Barbarian For Your Post:

    User Name (September 26th, 2017)

  16. #100
    Over 1500 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 246 Times in 178 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    144636
    Quote Originally Posted by The Barbarian View Post
    That's the killer for Walt's story. How do we see a comet with a period of millions of years, returning in a solar system only a few thousand years old?
    Easy: The fountains of the great deep exploded with such force that the debris ejected into outer space reached superluminal speeds. Their speed was subsequently reduced by the drag created from the freezing of the water into ice crystals. Don't you know anything about the second law of thermodynamics?

  17. #101
    Over 5000 post club The Barbarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,606
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 661 Times in 456 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    186104
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Easy: The fountains of the great deep exploded with such force that the debris ejected into outer space reached superluminal speeds. Their speed was subsequently reduced by the drag created from the freezing of the water into ice crystals. Don't you know anything about the second law of thermodynamics?
    Ah. Never thought about how the Dunning-Kruger effect might apply here.
    Let's say that I suffer from a delusion. I will call this delusion "Fact-check Syndrome." I respond by citing facts.

    Most people online don't want to be corrected. They do not care about anything that does not agree with them.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to The Barbarian For Your Post:

    User Name (September 27th, 2017)

  19. #102
    Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle Stripe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Posts
    15,138
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 7,325 Times in 5,838 Posts

    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    Rep Power
    2147791
    Quote Originally Posted by gcthomas View Post
    Quite. There are no mathematical models detailing how he works out the orbits that can be reached from that singular event, and how their orbits are changed to their current parameters.
    Wrong, of course. The ideas are explained clearly.

    How about you honestly represent them so we know you've read that which you are determined cannot be true.

    There is no explanation how the very long period comets could have come back quite so quickly.
    Wrong, of course. The ideas are explained clearly.

    How about you honestly represent them so we know you've read that which you are determined cannot be true.

    or whether when the first hyperbolic comet is discovered that will be a valid disproof on top of its failure to accurately predict anything about the solar system.
    Well, nobody has the foggiest notion what you are talking about here, so we'll just ignore it.

    It a woolly,post hoc and vague justification of his odd biblical fundamentalist literalism. I suspect even Brown himself doesn't really think it is a good model, but it is all he has.
    Desperation won't help you.

    And for post hoc, he sure has made a lot of predictions that have borne out.

    For instance, the most striking was probably predicting that meteorites would be made up of rounded boulders.

    Predictions are the currency of science and Dr Brown presents his up front and clearly.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Barbarian View Post
    That's the killer for Walt's story.
    Nope.

    Just your desperation.

    How do we see a comet with a period of millions of years, returning in a solar system only a few thousand years old?
    Wrong, of course. The ideas are explained clearly.

    How about you honestly represent them so we know you've read that which you are determined cannot be true.

    Kepler's laws rule out any shorter period for them.
    Luckily, we don't have to pretend that the macro scope of the laws you are applying here would be the only things affecting tiny pieces of space debris.

    Desperation will get you nowhere.


    Sent from my SM-A520F using TOL mobile app
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    When the world is a monster
    Bad to swallow you whole
    Kick the clay that holds the teeth in
    Throw your trolls out the door

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.


  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Stripe For Your Post:

    JudgeRightly (September 28th, 2017)

  21. #103
    Over 1500 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 246 Times in 178 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    144636
    Quote Originally Posted by Stripe View Post
    Predictions are the currency of science and Dr Brown presents his up front and clearly.
    Why do you suppose the Nobel Committee hasn't recognized Dr Walt's genius?

  22. #104
    Silver Member JudgeRightly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On the road
    Posts
    3,491
    Thanks
    6,104
    Thanked 1,956 Times in 1,330 Posts

    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    428696
    Quote Originally Posted by User Name View Post
    Why do you suppose the Nobel Committee hasn't recognized Dr Walt's genius?
    For the same reason Creationists don't publish in leading science journals.

  23. #105
    Over 1500 post club User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 246 Times in 178 Posts

    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    144636
    Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly View Post
    For the same reason Creationists don't publish in leading science journals.
    In other words, because Walt's claims are physically impossible?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Since 1997 TheologyOnline (TOL) has been one of the most popular theology forums on the internet. On TOL we encourage spirited conversation about religion, politics, and just about everything else.

follow us