Recent content by staind.raindrop

It's because His impending (at the time) crucifixion covers them, too. Once for everyone in the past, present and future.

So non-conformers get the death penalty... that's much less savage!

Well at least I'm not asking questions in the form of statements.

I don't always ask questions looking for answers, haven't you noticed?

So if God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent, how does He send people out of His presence since He is everywhere?

Yeah, well I can't prove it to people who refuse to believe it since the only proof we have available to us is in the Bible.

They weren't sacrificing Him as the atonement for sin knowingly, so he wasn't asking God to forgive them for that. His atonement covers everyone who achieved righteousness by faith and that includes the ones who lived and died before Him.

Repentance and obedience is all that is necessary now but that doesn't mean a blood sacrifice was unnecessary in order to achieve that reality.

Not it!

I'm glad you established that because as you can see, I was concluding the opposite.

I wouldn't say it's the same thing as saying that blood sacrifice isn't part of the law. It seems that mercy is the goal but sacrifice is the means to achieve it, so it can be easy to get confused into thinking that He desires sacrifice.

Idk why I have such a hard time interpreting much of what you say. I am speaking my mind, now.

Well I'm certainly not with you. I'm asking you to clarify what you meant because I don't have enough information to do it myself. I get the impression from that post that you were suggesting that I didn't ask Eeset for clarity. Is that true? I'm asking you to clarify your intent for me.

I asked you for clarity regarding the above post. You with me?

Do you imply that you think honest responses are important? Clearly not.