Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Walton vs. axiom-tech discussion

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by macguy View Post
    Thanks for sharing Knight! I am curious, has there ever been a successful creationist who won a debate?
    Read the link I supplied.

    If not, I guess when I am 16 then I'll try a one-one someday. Or is there a age limit guideline for this? :P
    No age limit.

    Just prove yourself to be a worthy opponent and maybe we will give you your shot.
    Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
    TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

    Comment


    • #47
      Heck, I should do a formal debate w. macguy or something

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by axiom-tech View Post
        Heck, I should do a formal debate w. macguy or something
        Or we could discuss my point here...


        axiom-tech said:

        The truth is that having reliable cog-faculties, is adaptive. A creature with cognitive faculties that produce true conclusions will be more likely to find food, or avoid danger. Adaptive may be the goal, but reliable cognitive faculties is the means which contributes to the goal.



        Me:

        I would say that this is generally true, but false beliefs may also be adaptive. A man may have an irrational fear of the color orange, he thinks if "orange" touches him, he will turn orange. He therefore runs everytime he sees a tiger - and lives.

        Another point, the vast majority of human beings, for the majority of history have believed in god or gods. That there was something "out there" that man was accountable to. Now Axiom contends that this universal belief is false, but it must have an adaptive function or it would not be so ingrained in humanity.

        So Axiom has two choices:

        1. There really is something "out there" that man is accountable to,

        or

        2. He has to admit that a universal false belief is adaptive. Which now makes all our beliefs and conclusions suspect.
        "He who learns must suffer.Even in our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God." Aeschylus

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by axiom-tech View Post
          Heck, I should do a formal debate w. macguy or something
          That would be fun.

          Originally posted by Knight
          Read the link I supplied.
          Hehe, my mistake since I assumed that threads with "Does God exist?" doesn't deal with the scientific arguments. Okie dokie, i'll do my best to prove worthy of a debate someday..! Oh, wait, prove myself worthy to whom? My opponent, TOL or both?
          Last edited by Turbo; May 2nd, 2007, 07:15 PM.
          The voiceless, the wasted...You soaked your hearts in gasoline. Now light it up and burn.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by macguy View Post
            That would be fun.



            Hehe, my mistake since I assumed that threads with "Does God exist?" doesn't deal with the scientific arguments. Okie dokie, i'll do my best to prove worthy of a debate someday..! Oh, wait, prove myself worthy to whom? My opponent, TOL or both?
            Would you like to have a one on one with axiom?
            Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
            TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Knight View Post
              Would you like to have a one on one with axiom?
              Yes he would!
              "He who learns must suffer.Even in our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God." Aeschylus

              Comment


              • #52
                Well a debate between macguy and axiom would most likely wash the taste of Frank Walton from our collective mouths. You got off easy Knight, Frank called Rich a "taco head" and said horrible things about his wife. Honestly I think he is nothing but a troublemaking troll.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by s Allegory View Post
                  Well a debate between macguy and axiom would most likely wash the taste of Frank Walton from our collective mouths. You got off easy Knight, Frank called Rich a "taco head" and said horrible things about his wife. Honestly I think he is nothing but a troublemaking troll.
                  I do not know (nor do I want to know) who Frank Walton is.

                  I thought I was doing a guy a favor during my busy weekend. Boy was I wrong!
                  Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
                  TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Knight View Post
                    Would you like to have a one on one with axiom?
                    Sure if he wants to that is! Just going to have to wait a bit until I finish with this lengthy response to Ken Miller. Do we have to do that guideline thing?

                    Originally posted by Seer
                    Yes he would!
                    How did you know?
                    The voiceless, the wasted...You soaked your hearts in gasoline. Now light it up and burn.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by macguy View Post

                      How did you know?
                      Why do you think the call me "seer?"
                      "He who learns must suffer.Even in our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God." Aeschylus

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by macguy View Post
                        Do we have to do that guideline thing?
                        No.

                        The guideline thing was made up by Frank.

                        A normal One on One is just like any other thread except it's limited to just two people.

                        What say ye axiom?
                        What say ye macguy?
                        Also be sure to.... Join TOL on Facebook | Follow TOL on Twitter
                        TOL Newbies CLICK HERE or....upgrade your TOL today!

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Oh good, then I am in!! Now I'll just wait for axiom's move.
                          The voiceless, the wasted...You soaked your hearts in gasoline. Now light it up and burn.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Yes, of course.

                            Formal debates do make me nervous, and this was my first. I know frank, and felt fine about it since I know he is more about being contraversial than acedemic. Macguy is intimidating, but I believe i have truth on my side.

                            My favorite topics:

                            Freewill?
                            Do gods exist?

                            I am willing to do a formal, but macguy, do you have a mic? How do you feel about a voice-discussion? Or (this wont be cool for you guys) joining a philosophy confrence call my friends and I have from time to time.

                            Also, if we do have a debate i'm willing to do a 'no-rules' since the word limit stuff was nonsense. I understand its in the name of fairness, but again it does not matter how many words you have, if you're position is false then you lose.

                            Of course, thats why the debate exists, to try and reveal what may or may not be true.

                            Pick the topic my friend.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by axiom-tech View Post
                              Formal debates do make me nervous, and this was my first. I know frank, and felt fine about it since I know he is more about being contraversial than acedemic. Macguy is intimidating, but I believe i have truth on my side.
                              Same here, I don't really know what to expect out of a formal debate as i haven't done one since 2 years ago. Hehe, well I guess we will see what happens!

                              Freewill?
                              Do gods exist?
                              Hmm, I don't necessarily like the term "free" will but maybe we'll save that for another time. You are going to question the free will of God correct? As for do gods exist, must we argue for gods? I was hoping for more along the lines of arguing for the Christian God but that may be fine. I just don't see how multiple gods, which in most stories have great fights among each other would be able to create uniformity in nature. Perhaps sub-gods are possible in the christian view, but I don't think multiple conflicting gods can exist. What say you?

                              I am willing to do a formal, but macguy, do you have a mic? How do you feel about a voice-discussion? Or (this wont be cool for you guys) joining a philosophy confrence call my friends and I have from time to time.
                              Well all macs have built-in mics and I have done a lot of casual talking to my friends but am not sure how it would feel to gather my thoughts during a live discussion. As for the conference, wouldn't that be you and friends vs me?

                              Also, if we do have a debate i'm willing to do a 'no-rules' since the word limit stuff was nonsense.
                              I agree with you completely since I don't want to be under restrictions as it really stops a informative discussion.
                              The voiceless, the wasted...You soaked your hearts in gasoline. Now light it up and burn.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Hmm, I don't necessarily like the term "free" will but maybe we'll save that for another time. You are going to question the free will of God correct? As for do gods exist, must we argue for gods?
                                No, 'do we have freewill' or 'what is a free choice' or 'does determanism confict w. freewill'


                                not sure how it would feel to gather my thoughts during a live discussion. As for the conference, wouldn't that be you and friends vs me?
                                no

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X