I'm curious ........
What word do you think specifically needed to be in the definition of examples in order for the word to ever be qualified to be used of GOD??????
Spammers wasteland
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
What word do you think specifically needed to be in the definition of examples in order for the word to ever be qualified to be used of GOD??????
Really?
How so?
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
None. It's a term of contingency, and God is Non-Contingent. That's why it was defined as it was. And you clearly insisted the definition was correct, so you're without excuse coming and going.
Still trying to save face out of outrageous pride.
Only rank heretics of the lowest order would refuse to comprehend that. And this is a matter of long-standing theological history, not just my subjective opinion.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Does Synergism apply to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit?
Yes or No.
Affirm the heresy or recant.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Sarcasm. Which is clearly as lost on you as theological truth to maintain Monotheism instead of your impulsive and spontaneous innovation of Tritheism.
musterion
Well-known member
She believes he's saved and won't correct him when he says none of us are. She's known by the company she keeps.
Fascinating how people always line up here sooner or later.
Well, some just don't like to say that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work together.
The definition of the word is "working together".
Yes, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit work together.
If you say "no", you are the heretic.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
He tries to fool us with great swelling words, just as Ernest T tried to fool Mrs. Wiley. He could not pass himself off as Mr. Gossage from Raleigh, and PPS cannot pass himself off as a "great one".
Better get to checking all the words you use for GOD, and see if the exact correct words are used in it's definition so it will qualify as a word to use of GOD.
musterion
Well-known member
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No. We just use the correct term of perichoresis instead of being rank heretic Tritheists who determine to be right when wrong.
You just can't stand that your ridiculous improv innovation landed you square in the middle of being the most reprobate schismatic possible.
And you still persist. There is no equivalence to your arrogance and self-justification.
There's nothing more wretched.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No. The definition, as a term of contingency, is organizations, substances, or agents doing so. Those don't apply to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, who are Non-Contingent.
You can't EVER admit you're wrong, even when you have blasphemed Almighty God with your insolent rubbish.
Desperation. I've affirmed they do, and without synergy as contingency.
Since you still endorse the term synergy after being extensively coorected, and you won't recant; you willfully and pridefully remain a Tritheist heretic.
Now it's not in ignorance.
And you never addressed God's relation with man according to salvation.
There's nothing more pathetic than this kind of theologizing and its defense. And your juvenile peers are now complicit.
Rogue antichrist blasphemers.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No, that was Tambora and her synergy claims. Now you're complicit. Congrats, gangland of Dispos.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Fascinating how you support heretics because you are one.
You are the rogue. Look around you
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Should we burn at the stake all that do not regurgitate your creeds verbatim?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Rogue is one of my favorite Madonna songs. :noid:
- Status