Supreme Court: Marriage

[Town Heretic]

Chief Justice Roy Moore Says Supreme Court Justices Can be Impeached http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/3787476347.html

Sure. It was tried once, initiated by the House in 1805 before the Senate killed it. All you need is a serious violation of law or ethic. You can also raise an amendment to the Constitution, but both are arduous tasks and this one is a fool's errand.

Maybe Moore should helm the try.

 

[serpentdove]

Sure. It was tried once, initiated by the House in 1805 before the Senate killed it. All you need is a serious violation of law or ethic. You can also raise an amendment to the Constitution, but both are arduous tasks and this one is a fool's errand...

:idunno: Or don't appoint lawless men in the first place. :cigar: 2 Thess. 2:7, 8

 

[Town Heretic]

:idunno: Or don't appoint lawless men in the first place. :cigar:8

They aren't lawless until adjudicated as such, your inclinations notwithstanding. We've removed the judge and jury nature of a king and made a system to protect a man against a mob that thinks it knows a thing it may well not.

 

[serpentdove]

They aren't lawless until adjudicated as such, your inclinations notwithstanding.

:yawn: Who cares what I say? What has God said? oly: Gen. 2:18–24, Heb 13:4

Laws come from God (Ge 2:7) :straight: not government (Ge 11:4). :Commie:

 

[Town Heretic]

...Laws come from God :straight: not government. :Commie:

Not if you're speaking to a violation of law that would allow a S. Ct. Justice to be removed, which was, after all, the point I responded to.

 

[serpentdove]

...Laws come from God not government.

You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).

Laws come from God (Ge 2:7) :straight: not government (Ge 11:4). :Commie:

Not if...

God said it. That settles it (Prov. 29:2).

 

[Town Heretic]

You removed the scripture from my quote.

I always do. You too often misuse it, to my mind.

Laws come from God :straight: not government. :Commie:

Not if you're speaking to the point I was responding to, which involved impeachment of a sitting S. Ct. Justice.

 

[serpentdove]

[You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).] I always do...

You do (Eph 4:14).

See:

TH misquotes me

 

[THall]

Not if you're speaking to the point I was responding to, which involved impeachment of a sitting S. Ct. Justice.

Wise up.


"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."


"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.-"


If the Government fining a small baker $130,000.00 for not
baking a gay union cake, is not reducing that baker under absolute despotism,
I don't know what is.

 

[Town Heretic]

Wise up.

I don't think that means what you think it does.

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Yes, Polly, I read that too. Now, anything on the current topic. I'll help you, Roy Moore, who was a self-aggrandizing twit at Alabama and remains one to this day, noted a S. Ct. Justice could be impeached. He was right (twit though he is, he gets a few in).

SD short handed that and I responded on the point. Try to address it without putting your eyes out, if you think you can.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.-"

Or you could just keep this sort of thing up.

If the Government fining a small baker $130,000.00 for not
baking a gay union cake, is not reducing that baker under absolute despotism, I don't know what is

We agree completely, you have no idea what you're talking about. :thumb:

Anything on the actual point I addressed or did you just miss talking to me?

 

[serpentdove]

Wise up.


"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."


"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.-"


If the Government fining a small baker $130,000.00 for not
baking a gay union cake, is not reducing that baker under absolute despotism,
I don't know what is.

:thumb: Jn 8:36, Eph 6:13 :5020:

 

[Jose Fly]

If the Government fining a small baker $130,000.00 for not
baking a gay union cake, is not reducing that baker under absolute despotism,
I don't know what is.

The same government agency awarded a Christian $325,000 from his employer for discrimination on the basis of religion.

Where was your outrage then?

 

[serpentdove]

The same government agency awarded a Christian $325,000 from his employer for discrimination on the basis of religion.

Where was your outrage then?

Why would that be outrageous? Christians are the only ones fit to lead (Titus 2:15).

 

[serpentdove]

Judge won't marry Sodomites http://m.toledoblade.com/Courts/2015/07/08/Judge-wouldn-t-marry-us-same-sex-pair-says.html

 

[serpentdove]

Sodomite divorce Gen. 2:18–24

Related:

A transsexual marrying under false pretenses

Homosexuality is: forbidden (Lev. 18:22), considered an abomination (1 Kin. 14:24), punishment for (Lev. 20:13), unclean (Rom. 1:24, 26, 27). :vomit:

 

[serpentdove]

We Will Not Bow, Part 1 by John MacArthur

 

[serpentdove]

Rand Paul: Government Should Get Out of the Marriage Business Altogether :zman:

Mark Levin: a state's issue :cigar:

"You have to obey the law." ~ Bill O'Reilly, 3 Sept 15 television program

"I don't know what I would have done with her--I don't know." ~ Laura Inraham

Laws come from God not man (Ge 2:18-24, 1 Ti 1:8-10, Ac 5:29). :dizzy:

See:

Should Christians Judge? By Bob Enyart

 

[Ktoyou]

Those who desire to de-sexualize marriage, wish to end the cultural foundations, deeply embedded in our civil society, history and culture, and enthrone the new, ‘partnership’ understanding, which assumes that any legal distinction between same sex and male-female unions is arbitrary and discriminatory. Put simply, the law declares that all those who hold to the conjugal understanding of marriage are little better than racists. They do this for one purpose, the economic reality of such strange structural arrangements.

 

[serpentdove]

Those who desire to de-sexualize marriage, wish to end the cultural foundations, deeply embedded in our civil society, history and culture, and enthrone the new, ‘partnership’ understanding, which assumes that any legal distinction between same sex and male-female unions is arbitrary and discriminatory. Put simply, the law declares that all those who hold to the conjugal understanding of marriage are little better than racists. They do this for one purpose, the economic reality of such strange structural arrangements.

It's not about homos. It's about destroying marriage (Heb 13:4).

 

[Ktoyou]

It's not about homos. It's about destroying marriage (Heb 13:4).

My point is most relevant today. Do you understand what I said?