Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supreme Court: Marriage

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by chrysostom View Post
    can you tell the difference in the judges now?
    Yes, the Republicans gave us abortion, the Democrats gave us homosexual marriage.

    The answer is simple: Stop voting for Republicans and Democrats.
    Learn to read what is written.

    _____
    The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
    ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
      EXACTLY. Liberals in these conversations always avoid the word lust. They simply roll it into 'Love' which is a disservice to the actual meaning and the rest of us that are also restricted to using the English language.
      If one is willing to commit adultery/fornication ([Ex 20:14] heterosexual [Lev. 20:10–12] or homosexual [Lev. 20:13]), he is also willing to manipulate words (2 Cor. 4:2, 2 Pet. 3:16). The Left (Eccl 10:2, Jn 10:10) is better at language if one prefers to live in delusionland (Ps 10:1–11, Lk 12:17–19, Lk 13:23–30, 2 Thess. 2:1–12, 2 Pet. 3:5, 16, 17).

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by The Horn View Post
        Saying that same sex marriage is a "threat " to "traditional marriage " and will "destroy" the family is as ridiculous as saying that granting voting rights to women and blacks long ago was a "threat" to the voting rights of white males .
        There is not one shred of evidence that being raised by gay parents is in any way harmful to children .
        You haven't done your research. Much, much social harm will arise from this ruling. It is ignorant to think differently.
        He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
        ~Daniel 2:22

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Nazaroo View Post
          And they will still have to go to third party reproduction to have kids----sadly, they will insist government and taxpayers pick up the tab for it all.
          He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
          ~Daniel 2:22

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
            You haven't done your research. Much, much social harm will arise from this ruling.
            How will *you* be harmed?

            It is ignorant to think differently.
            Paranoia.
            TRUST
            is a fragile thing.

            Easy to break, Easy to lose
            and one of the hardest things to
            ever get back.







            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Rusha View Post
              How will *you* be harmed?



              Paranoia.
              Nope. Truth.
              He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
              ~Daniel 2:22

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                Nope. Truth.
                Yes. Truth. This is paranoia. On your part. Obsessing over the private lives of others IS just ... bizarre and unhealthy.
                TRUST
                is a fragile thing.

                Easy to break, Easy to lose
                and one of the hardest things to
                ever get back.







                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
                  "I was talking about one side of the argument limiting the vocabulary they are using (often times purposefully by the intellectual elite of one group, so their less bright members have simple slogans to chant)."
                  Spoon-feeding the wicked (Jer 5:31, 2 Ti 4:3). “One with God is a majority” ~ Martin Luther

                  Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
                  "In this case liberals, the group I was addressing, like to boil arguments down to selfish humanism."
                  If it feels good do it. 2 Tim. 3:2-4, Phil 2:21

                  Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
                  "...I certainly believe gay people can love each other."
                  Sodomites ([Ex 20:14] heterosexual [Lev. 20:10–12] or homosexual [Lev. 20:13]) do not love one another. People do not love others when they sin against themselves and another (1 Co 6:18). Love wants what is best for his neighbor (Mt 22:39, Judg 21:25, Jn 10:10).

                  Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
                  "...'[R]ights' cases that the current struggle for 'gay rights' liken themselves to."
                  Men have the right to obey (Ac 5:29). Obey God and live. Don't and you won't (Re 20:14).
                  "You can build on him (1 Cor. 10:4) or stumble on him (1 Pet. 2:8). He'll be a stepping stone (Ps 18:2) or stumbling stone (1 Cor 1:23, Luke 20:18)." ~ Adrian Rogers
                  Last edited by serpentdove; June 29th, 2015, 04:28 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Rusha View Post
                    Yes. Truth. This is paranoia. On your part. Obsessing over the private lives of others IS just ... bizarre and unhealthy.
                    Erm, it's their PUBLIC lives and actions which I find worrisome for the future......... not my own, but of children and youth of today.
                    He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                    ~Daniel 2:22

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by LightPattern View Post
                      And sticking with the topic of how this affects our speaking English... What do members here think about using another word now for holy marriage? Stick with the term "matrimony" perhaps? The pairing "holy matrimony" always comes to mind for me.
                      Our word is marriage (Gen. 2:18–24). Their word is rebellion (Heb 13:4). God does not leave covenant relationships (Mt 19:6, Rom. 7:2, 3). A marriage is worthy of his presence (John 2:1–11). A sham is not. God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen. 13:13, 19:1–28). He did not parTy harTy with them.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                        Erm, it's their PUBLIC lives and actions which I find worrisome for the future......... not my own, but of children and youth of today.
                        we will have to look for other ways to protect the children

                        marriage is now being used to protect two guys living together
                        a voice crying in the wilderness :chrysost:

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by GFR7 View Post
                          Erm, it's their PUBLIC lives and actions which I find worrisome for the future
                          How so? Being gay does not mean they are exempt from the same laws that apply to the rest of us.

                          Why is it that your concern for the public lives of married couples has never extended to heterosexuals couples who are on display over adultery, domestic/child abuse, drugs/alcohol, arrests, etc?
                          TRUST
                          is a fragile thing.

                          Easy to break, Easy to lose
                          and one of the hardest things to
                          ever get back.







                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by chrysostom View Post
                            we will have to look for other ways to protect the children

                            marriage is now being used to protect two guys living together
                            Protecting children was never the primary function or reason for marriage.

                            IF it were, child bearing would be a mandatory requirement for marriage.
                            TRUST
                            is a fragile thing.

                            Easy to break, Easy to lose
                            and one of the hardest things to
                            ever get back.







                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by chrysostom View Post
                              we will have to look for other ways to protect the children

                              marriage is now being used to protect two guys living together
                              I know, but you and I both know this is not its proper usage, and that marriage is still the best way to protect children, and civilization itself.
                              He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                              ~Daniel 2:22

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Rusha View Post
                                Protecting children was never the primary function or reason for marriage.

                                IF it were, child bearing would be a mandatory requirement for marriage.
                                Ancestry, descendants, and the natural family were always the foundation of marriage, and many infertile couples are bitterly angry that gays capitalized on their misfortune to redefine marriage.
                                He reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what lies in darkness, and light dwells with him.
                                ~Daniel 2:22

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X