Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The UFO phenomenon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    How many Bigfoot sightings have there been? We don't have one of those bodies either

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by CatholicCrusader View Post
      How many Bigfoot sightings have there been? We don't have one of those bodies either
      Not trying to force you to believe in this stuff. I'm just presenting the best evidence I can find on the topic, take it or leave it. Speaking of which:

      Out of the Blue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYPCKIL7oVw

      Out of the Blue

      Comment


      • #33
        At the National Press Club in Washington D.C., an unprecedented gathering of top military and government officials from around the world met LIVE before members of the Press to present to the public alarming facts about UFOs and an extraterrestrial presence now engaging the planet Earth. This presentation provides LIVE coverage of that historic press conference:

        =

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by User Name View Post
          The quality and quantity of evidence for [UFOs'] existence is very compelling.
          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
          E≈mc2
          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
          -Bob B.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
            This one is more appropriate: www.kgov.com/pot.
            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
            E≈mc2
            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
            -Bob B.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Stripe View Post
              This one is more appropriate: www.kgov.com/pot.
              Rev. describes UFO sighting

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                Viewers of this thread will take note of the fact that all of the mockers have utterly refused to discuss any of the evidence. They don't dare try, because the moment they try to pick the evidence apart they will realize it is true.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by User Name View Post
                  Viewers of this thread will take note of the fact that all of the mockers have utterly refused to discuss any of the evidence. They don't dare try, because the moment they try to pick the evidence apart they will realize it is true.
                  Right, because discussing conspiracy theories and aliens with an admitted pothead is totally worthwhile.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by JudgeRightly View Post
                    Right, because discussing conspiracy theories and aliens with an admitted pothead is totally worthwhile.
                    Wrong, because these aren't "conspiracy theories" and I am not an "admitted pothead."

                    JudgeWrongly

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by User Name View Post
                      Viewers of this thread will take note of the fact that all of the mockers have utterly refused to discuss any of the evidence. They don't dare try, because the moment they try to pick the evidence apart they will realize it is true.
                      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                      E≈mc2
                      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                      -Bob B.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by User Name View Post
                        Viewers of this thread will take note of the fact that all of the mockers have utterly refused to discuss any of the evidence. They don't dare try, because the moment they try to pick the evidence apart they will realize it is true.
                        unidentified flying evidence

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Something's flying. It's not evidence.
                          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                          E≈mc2
                          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                          -Bob B.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                            Something's flying. It's not evidence.
                            One of the best UFO photographs in the world was taken by the National Geographic Institute in Costa Rica on September 4, 1971. The Institute was taking photographs to create a map to determine where the water would come from for the acquisition of land to develop the Arenal dam project.

                            Sergio Loaiza, along with Juan Bravo and Francico Reyes, were flying in a Canadian made Areo-Commander model F680. Loaiza had a NRK 15-23 camera, weighing 100 lbs, on the floor of the airplane. On that day he was in charge of aerial photography.

                            Flying at 10,000 feet, the camera fired every 13 seconds. It was later when IGN employees noticed the object:



                            Analysis of the photograph revealed that the object was in the air and has no wings or visible means of propulsion:



                            Loaiza was in charge of reviewing the photos, recounting that while enlarging the images and then examining the negative closely, they realized what had been photographed. “At the time we were completely banned from talking about it, we could not tell anyone,” said Loaiza.

                            http://qcostarica.com/45-years-ago-a...sed-the-world/

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                              E≈mc2
                              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                              -Bob B.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by User Name View Post
                                One of the best UFO photographs in the world was taken by the National Geographic Institute in Costa Rica on September 4, 1971. The Institute was taking photographs to create a map to determine where the water would come from for the acquisition of land to develop the Arenal dam project.

                                Sergio Loaiza, along with Juan Bravo and Francico Reyes, were flying in a Canadian made Areo-Commander model F680. Loaiza had a NRK 15-23 camera, weighing 100 lbs, on the floor of the airplane. On that day he was in charge of aerial photography.

                                Flying at 10,000 feet, the camera fired every 13 seconds. It was later when IGN employees noticed the object:



                                Analysis of the photograph revealed that the object was in the air and has no wings or visible means of propulsion:



                                Loaiza was in charge of reviewing the photos, recounting that while enlarging the images and then examining the negative closely, they realized what had been photographed. “At the time we were completely banned from talking about it, we could not tell anyone,” said Loaiza.

                                http://qcostarica.com/45-years-ago-a...sed-the-world/
                                That one looks like a lens flare. Look at it closely, does it look like a reflection of a camera lens?
                                Everyman is a voice in the dark.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X