Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mock those who report posts that don't break the rules

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Lighthouse View Post
    First off, he didn't call me a name. Secondly, people can call me all the names they want. I don't care. In fact, on another message board I use to frequent I would have never reported such a comment, because it would not have been in violation of the site rules, nor does it bother me for someone to use such a phrase toward me. The issue here is that what he said was vulgar, and in violation of TOL rules. That is the one and only reason I reported it. If a member of the TOL staff tells me that I am wrong, and that doc wasn't violating the rules, fine. I'll certainly drop it then, and let doc run his mouth whining about it all he wants. And I will not respond. Or if he wants to drop it, I can go with that too. But as long as no staff member tells me it was not a violation and doc keeps whining about it, I'll keep mocking him for whining.
    Would not the lack of response by the moderators seem to imply a non-violation?

    Comment


    • #92
      Not necessarily....
      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
      E≈mc2
      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
      -Bob B.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by drbrumley View Post
        Don't look now, but who is whining?
        What am I whining about? Huh?

        You want me to ignore you? Fine.

        Originally posted by koban View Post
        That's funny, whenever you're called a homo you whine about it like a ...well, like a homo.
        When was the last time I said anything about someone calling me a homo? I told one person to drop it, because it was the only stupid joke he had, and he acted like a three year old, so I asked Knight to tell him to stop, because I figured that would put an end to it. And I only wanted it to end because it was getting old and tired. When he ignored Knight it was out of my hands. I said nothing more to Knight about it, and Knight banned him for disrespecting Knight, not for disrespecting me. And then you, like the idiot you are, started in on it and got yourself in trouble because you couldn't learn from someone else's example. And I never once said anything to Knight about you saying it. In fact, I didn't care about you saying it. I had nothing to do with you getting in trouble. In fact, if they had asked me if I had a problem with it, I would have said, "No."

        Originally posted by Mr. 5020 View Post
        Would not the lack of response by the moderators seem to imply a non-violation?
        Originally posted by Stripe View Post
        Not necessarily....
        What Stripe said.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Stripe View Post
          Not necessarily....
          I guess that's true.

          But in this case, there certainly was not a violation.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Lighthouse View Post
            When was the last time I said anything about someone calling me a homo? I told one person to drop it, because it was the only stupid joke he had, and he acted like a three year old, so I asked Knight to tell him to stop, because I figured that would put an end to it. And I only wanted it to end because it was getting old and tired. When he ignored Knight it was out of my hands. I said nothing more to Knight about it, and Knight banned him for disrespecting Knight, not for disrespecting me. And then you, like the idiot you are, started in on it and got yourself in trouble because you couldn't learn from someone else's example. And I never once said anything to Knight about you saying it. In fact, I didn't care about you saying it. I had nothing to do with you getting in trouble. In fact, if they had asked me if I had a problem with it, I would have said, "No."


            Man! What a whiner!

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Mr. 5020 View Post
              But in this case, there certainly was not a violation.
              There was certainly the implication of one
              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
              E≈mc2
              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
              -Bob B.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                There was certainly the implication of one
                No, it was an inference.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #98
                  Hey whinehouse, grow a pair and stop crying.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Lighthouse,

                    Look, I tried to cut you some slack. But you just keep on, not knowing how or when to just shut your mouth. So everyone, since it is fairly obvious his brain is as big as a turnup seed, I have to sit here and type the obvious.

                    I told you to stick it up your rearend. An expression. Now what exactly did I say to stick up your rearend? Your words you brainless half breed! That was the subject. You called me an idiot (and for what, delving into a topic that I haven't before and was wanting opinion on), so you can take your words IDIOT and stick it where the sun don't shine. Now please tell us all, how do you derive a sexual overtone from that? Unless you are that insecure in your being and that embarrassed at yourself.

                    Now you are on my ignore list till you come to your senses. And get professional help!
                    The state — whatever its particular forms — always expresses itself as a collective form of property ownership. All political systems are socialistic, in that they are premised upon the subservience of individual interests to collective authority. Communism, fascism, lesser forms of state socialism, and welfarism, are all premised upon the state’s usurpation of privately-owned property. Whether one chooses to be aligned with the political "Left," "Right," or "Middle," comes down to nothing more than a preference for a particular franchise of state socialism.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by drbrumley View Post
                      Lighthouse,

                      Look, I tried to cut you some slack. But you just keep on, not knowing how or when to just shut your mouth. So everyone, since it is fairly obvious his brain is as big as a turnup seed, I have to sit here and type the obvious.

                      I told you to stick it up your rearend. An expression. Now what exactly did I say to stick up your rearend? Your words you brainless half breed! That was the subject. You called me an idiot (and for what, delving into a topic that I haven't before and was wanting opinion on), so you can take your words IDIOT and stick it where the sun don't shine. Now please tell us all, how do you derive a sexual overtone from that?

                      Sounds pretty gay to me!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by kmoney View Post
                        Hey whinehouse, grow a pair and stop crying.

                        What am I crying about? I reported a post for the wording, nothing else. Then doc, the one who posted it, started whining about my reporting him.

                        Originally posted by drbrumley View Post
                        Lighthouse,

                        Look, I tried to cut you some slack. But you just keep on, not knowing how or when to just shut your mouth. So everyone, since it is fairly obvious his brain is as big as a turnup seed, I have to sit here and type the obvious.

                        I told you to stick it up your rearend. An expression. Now what exactly did I say to stick up your rearend? Your words you brainless half breed! That was the subject. You called me an idiot (and for what, delving into a topic that I haven't before and was wanting opinion on), so you can take your words IDIOT and stick it where the sun don't shine. Now please tell us all, how do you derive a sexual overtone from that? Unless you are that insecure in your being and that embarrassed at yourself.

                        Now you are on my ignore list till you come to your senses. And get professional help!
                        What part of, "I'm ignoring you," means that I want to continue this conversation?

                        And I'm secure in my own masculinity. It's yours I'm not too sure about. Goodbye.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • cursuswalker






                          Stripe
                          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                          E≈mc2
                          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                          -Bob B.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                            Now isn't that interesting?

                            How would Stripe know about the reporting of one of his posts if that report was found to be without grounds?

                            I take it then that calling someone a Fag on this forum is not seen as insulting or abusive? I will take note, as it's always blooming useful to know which exceptions to the rules you can get away with

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by cursuswalker View Post
                              Now isn't that interesting?

                              How would Stripe know about the reporting of one of his posts if that report was found to be without grounds?
                              Follow the link. If that doesn't work then Registered Plus

                              Originally posted by cursuswalker View Post
                              I take it then that calling someone a Fag on this forum is not seen as insulting or abusive? I will take note, as it's always blooming useful to know which exceptions to the rules you can get away with
                              So you do think calling someone a homo is an insult?
                              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                              E≈mc2
                              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                              -Bob B.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                                Follow the link. If that doesn't work then Registered Plus


                                So you do think calling someone a homo is an insult?
                                In the context in which it is usually used yes, in other words as a homophobic insult. For example Homo sapiens is no insult (and you must be one of those). Neither is calling Richard Whittington Dick.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X