Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ARCHIVE: Is this really demonic doctrine or what...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: I like you Jay!

    Originally posted by me again
    That is precisely why I asked you for the name that Jesus had before He was born into a mortal body.

    I’m still waiting for an answer, but I know it will not be forthcoming, at least not from Jay Bartlett.

    I still like you Jay.
    Well, I don't like you! I love you but don't really like you at all!

    I gave you an answer, go back and re-read my earlier posts.

    Comment


    • #47
      Ha! Here we go again hijacking another thread huh?
      Another false accusation by Freak. No wonder he has such a problem understanding the 6th commandment... he has yet to master "you shall not bear false witness"

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren
        Please answer these two questions Mr. Dodge:

        Are you aware that John the Baptist is also called an "angelos" - angel?

        Well Freak, how consistent are you going to be?? Is believing that the Angel of the Lord was Christ heresy?
        I also believe that Michael the Archangel was actually the Lord Jesus Christ in his pre-human birth form. He came here with the authority of the Father

        That quote from Detective is heresy. That is what we are dealing with on this thread. If you like to create another thread please do so.....

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren


          Another false accusation by Freak. No wonder he has such a problem understanding the 6th commandment... he has yet to master "you shall not bear false witness"
          Stop being a witch! It was not a false accusation. Leave me alone. Go see your husband and stop bothering me. You have yet to provide that documentation that you said you would provide, little lady.

          Comment


          • #50
            You hit the nail on the head

            Posted by Dee Dee Warren
            Is believing that the Angel of the Lord was Christ heresy?
            Right on!!!

            I believe that the Angel of the Lord, who spoke from the burning bush, was none other then Christ Himself!!!

            Comment


            • #51
              And Me Again, though we have never agreed on anything else before, you are absolutely right. Freak is reluctant to be consistent and call it heresy because he has just realized the painful corner he has painted himself into and is trying to surgically remove both feet from his mouth. I daresay at least 90% of the Trinitarians here, and Trinitarian commentators believe that the Angel of the Lord was Christ.

              That being said, I expressly deny that Michael was Christ, but I do not condemn it as heresy as long as the Trinity is still confessed.

              Comment


              • #52
                Jay is still winning friends and influencing enemies, eh?

                Look at his deft maneuver to Dee Dee:
                Posted by Freak
                Stop being a witch! Leave me alone. Go see your husband...
                Jay, who set your alarm clock?

                Comment


                • #53
                  Which is it Freak... witch or little lady? Those two ideas seem to be mutually exclusive. Perhaps you will feel better if you start a nasty thread about me. This is sad considering that you and I both agree on the nature of Christ and the Trinity.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Did Freak call her a Witch?
                    "Servetus has just sent me a long volume of his ravings. If I consent he will come here, but I will not give my word for if he comes here, if my authority is worth anything, I will never permit him to depart alive ("Si venerit, modo valeat mea autoritas, vivum exire nunquam patiar").[3]

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      I think Freak is the conjourer from Acts who was angry that the Apostle cast a demon out of his "magic show."
                      "Servetus has just sent me a long volume of his ravings. If I consent he will come here, but I will not give my word for if he comes here, if my authority is worth anything, I will never permit him to depart alive ("Si venerit, modo valeat mea autoritas, vivum exire nunquam patiar").[3]

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren
                        And Me Again, though we have never agreed on anything else before, you are absolutely right. Freak is reluctant to be consistent and call it heresy because he has just realized the painful corner he has painted himself into and is trying to surgically remove both feet from his mouth. I daresay at least 90% of the Trinitarians here, and Trinitarian commentators believe that the Angel of the Lord was Christ.

                        That being said, I expressly deny that Michael was Christ, but I do not condemn it as heresy as long as the Trinity is still confessed.
                        More speculation on DD's part!

                        Back up this claim:

                        I daresay at least 90% of the Trinitarians here, and Trinitarian commentators believe that the Angel of the Lord was Christ.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren
                          Which is it Freak... witch or little lady? Those two ideas seem to be mutually exclusive. Perhaps you will feel better if you start a nasty thread about me. This is sad considering that you and I both agree on the nature of Christ and the Trinity.
                          DD, it is true, we both agree 100% on the essential doctrines of the faith.

                          But what bothers me is your unwillingness to defend the nature of Jesus Christ when confronted with this trash: I also believe that Michael the Archangel was actually the Lord Jesus Christ in his pre-human birth form. He came here with the authority of the Father

                          Michael was not Jesus Christ in pre-human birth form. This is error. Jesus Christ is the God-man, He is not an angel. Would you agree, Me Again?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Please answer these two questions Mr. Dodge:

                            Are you aware that John the Baptist is also called an "angelos" - angel?

                            Well Freak, how consistent are you going to be?? Is believing that the Angel of the Lord was Christ heresy?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Dee Dee Warren
                              Please answer these two questions Mr. Dodge:

                              Are you aware that John the Baptist is also called an "angelos" - angel?

                              Well Freak, how consistent are you going to be?? Is believing that the Angel of the Lord was Christ heresy?
                              Little lady, I have answered your questions. You just didn't like the answers. I'm still waiting for some documentation, as you promised....

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                You did not answer the questions. Both questions require either a yes or a no response, not a tap dance. Soo...

                                Please answer these two questions Mr. Dodge:

                                Are you aware that John the Baptist is also called an "angelos" - angel?

                                Well Freak, how consistent are you going to be?? Is believing that the Angel of the Lord was Christ heresy?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X