Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Delmar's POD 8-10-14

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Delmar View Post
    Today's POD goes to Strpe for his masterful answer to this silly question.



    Post of the day!
    Great post! Who are you again...
    The winner of the 2011 Truthsmacker of the Year Award

    http://www.theologyonline.com/forums...pictureid=3504


    Help Take Back Our Country from Washington D.C.. with the Convention of States

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by shagster01 View Post
      Even if they are physically attracted to other men?
      Yup.

      Originally posted by Delmar View Post
      I think within the Hebew culture it was considered a given that men lusting after men is wicked. Why bother bringing up what everybody knows?
      That is irrelevant to what Sozo is trying to say.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #18
        I guess I am not clear on what he was saying.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by S0ZO View Post
          Sorry, but that is not why Jesus said that.

          He said that because it is a sin to lust after a woman. In fact, it is committing adultery to do so.

          "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Matt 5:28
          Agreed. He didn't just address himself to married men.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by bybee View Post
            Agreed. He didn't just address himself to married men.
            Technically He did. Those to whom He was directly speaking were all married.
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by bybee View Post
              Lust may have many objects. It is lusting that is a sin.
              Lust always puts self first.
              Finally, some reason enters the insult-fest. Yes, the sin is in the desire/willingness. The deed is just the sin being expressed.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by PureX View Post
                Finally, some reason enters the insult-fest.
                What insult-fest? I checked back on this entire thread and so no insults.

                Comment


                • #23
                  *saw*, not "so"

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by S0ZO View Post
                    What insult-fest? I checked back on this entire thread and so no insults.
                    I guess I was seeing things. Flashbacks from my misspent youth.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by PureX View Post
                      I guess I was seeing things. Flashbacks from my misspent youth.
                      Come on tell the truth. You just saw that I posted and knew there had to be some, right?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Oh, I guess shag wasn't interested in defending his nonsense idea in the original thread.
                        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                        E≈mc2
                        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                        -Bob B.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by S0ZO View Post
                          Come on tell the truth. You just saw that I posted and knew there had to be some, right?
                          Naw, if I'd thought that I wouldn't be able to see your post at all ... like res.

                          Comment


                          • #28

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X