PDA

View Full Version : No Prison Time For Gay Rapist Teacher



Servo
January 19th, 2006, 12:30 PM
You thought the judges in Vermont were bad? Apparently sixty days for rape is way too harsh for the judges in Massachusetts. The homo even pleaded guilty!


Judge Gives No Prison Time For Gay Rapist Teacher (http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/01/18/judge-gives-no-prison-time-for-gay-rapist-teacher/)
by Jay on 01-18-06 @ 6:55 pm Filed under ACLU, Supreme Court, News
Via WND

A former high school teacher who pleaded guilty to the homosexual rape of one of his teenage students will avoid jail time.

Gregory Pathiakis, 26, of Brockton, Mass., pleaded guilty yesterday to one count of rape of a child, enticement of a child under 16, five counts of possession of child pornography and one count of distribution of harmful material to a child, according to the Enterprise newspaper of Brockton, Mass.

Quite a list of evidence against this freak. The child porn was discovered after the investigators seized his computer to examine the emails he sent the teen. The rape took place in his apartment. The teen said the incident forced him to leave school and activities he loved and be homeschooled. The boy’s mother told the court, “You have destroyed our child and our family.” The man was arrested after the boy told authorities about the rape.

What would be justice for all of these charges? Prosecuters suggested four to eight years in state prison, followed by five years probation. Personally, I don’t think that is enough for such sickening crimes.

Brockton Superior Court Judge Suzanne V. Delvecchio issued a suspended, 2 1/2-year jail term, followed by five years probation. What is wrong with these judges? This is right on the heels of Judge Edward Cashman issuing a 60-day sentence to a man who confessed to repeatedly raping a girl over a four-year period, beginning when she was 7 years old. This judge even said he didn’t even believe in punishment!

Something is defitely wrong with these judge’s judicial philosophy. Let’s pray that there are not too many judges with a mindset like this out there. Let’s hope this is not a growing way of thinking among judges across the country. The amount of power and responsibility that is placed in the hands of a judge is enormous. They are supposed to bring justice, I hardly think their sentences come anywhere near that.

Knight
January 19th, 2006, 12:34 PM
I agree the man shouldn't have been sent to jail.


Instead, he should have had large boulders dropped on him. :dead:

Granite
January 19th, 2006, 12:36 PM
Ugh. Nice going, Mass...

kmoney
January 19th, 2006, 12:40 PM
:doh: idiot judges....

Servo
January 19th, 2006, 12:40 PM
I agree the man shouldn't have been sent to jail.


Instead, he should have had large boulders dropped on him. :dead:

Or several small stones thrown.

JoyfulRook
January 19th, 2006, 12:40 PM
Why are the Rapist and Judge still alive?!?!?! :madmad:

Servo
January 19th, 2006, 12:41 PM
:CRASH: :flamer:

Servo
January 19th, 2006, 12:45 PM
Why are the Rapist and Judge still alive?!?!?! :madmad:

Watch this not even be a major story. Homos and all, this might affect the Oscar awards and the publicity the homos are seeking. This story will probably quickly die.

kalel29
January 19th, 2006, 12:52 PM
I can't open the site, but if this is true, WTF. Those liberals up in the NE United States need to stop with their idealogical agendas and do their jobs. I feel bad for the people in those states with judges like this.

Lucky
January 19th, 2006, 01:17 PM
Stupid lady judge. :mad:

Here's the story (http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48397) on WND if the other link isn't working for you.

Agape4Robin
January 19th, 2006, 01:34 PM
Maybe that explains the pool of men the NFL gets their referees from.:think:

Agape4Robin
January 19th, 2006, 01:36 PM
Watch this not even be a major story. Homos and all, this might affect the Oscar awards and the publicity the homos are seeking. This story will probably quickly die. *british accent* By George, I think you've got it!:thumb: *british accent*

SUTG
January 19th, 2006, 02:24 PM
No punishment for a gay rapist?! Sounds like something the Vatican would do. :chuckle:

Knight
January 19th, 2006, 02:32 PM
No punishment for a gay rapist?! Sounds like something the Vatican would do. :chuckle:Great point. :up:

firechyld
January 19th, 2006, 09:15 PM
So why are you all considering what happened to the male rape victim to be worse than what happened to the female rape victim?

kmoney
January 19th, 2006, 10:20 PM
So why are you all considering what happened to the male rape victim to be worse than what happened to the female rape victim?
I'm pretty sure no one said that, at least I don't see it. I'm pretty sure every one is saying both should be sentenced the same way, death.

Turbo
January 19th, 2006, 10:32 PM
So why are you all considering what happened to the male rape victim to be worse than what happened to the female rape victim?
What brings you to that conclusion?

Turbo
January 19th, 2006, 10:33 PM
I'm pretty sure no one said that, at least I don't see it. I'm pretty sure every one is saying both should be sentenced the same way, death.
:up: Yep, all rapists should be put to death regardless of who their victims are.

Vaquero45
January 20th, 2006, 12:29 AM
No punishment for a gay rapist?! Sounds like something the Vatican would do. :chuckle:

Hey! Atheists aren't supposed to truthsmack!


:)

firechyld
January 20th, 2006, 02:42 AM
Everyone's responses are all "gay rapist" this and "gay rapist" that. The effect severely diminishes the fact that a female raped by a male has received the exact same treatment.

My point is, they don't HAVE to say it. It is implied by the way they address the article.

Nineveh
January 20th, 2006, 10:32 AM
So much for "equal rights".

There was a judge in my town who always let the child rapists off easy....

Come to find out he was a bird of that same feather.

SUTG
January 20th, 2006, 10:34 AM
Everyone's responses are all "gay rapist" this and "gay rapist" that. The effect severely diminishes the fact that a female raped by a male has received the exact same treatment.

My point is, they don't HAVE to say it. It is implied by the way they address the article.

This is because the gay rape is a new announcement in this article and thread. There was a whole other article and thread on the 'straight rape'.

Army of One
January 20th, 2006, 07:27 PM
Everyone's responses are all "gay rapist" this and "gay rapist" that. The effect severely diminishes the fact that a female raped by a male has received the exact same treatment.

My point is, they don't HAVE to say it. It is implied by the way they address the article.The "straight" rapist's execution was already called for by several people here (http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24894&page=1&pp=15).:)

Turbo
January 20th, 2006, 08:13 PM
Hey firechyld,

What do you think the "straight" rapist's punishment should be? Do you agree with us that he should be put to death?

firechyld
January 21st, 2006, 01:54 AM
Hey firechyld,

What do you think the "straight" rapist's punishment should be? Do you agree with us that he should be put to death?

No. I don't "believe in" the death penalty, and on a purely practical level I oppose in being used in rape cases as I feel it would simply make conviction even less likely.

One Eyed Jack
January 21st, 2006, 05:10 AM
On a purely practical level, I think it'll make rapes less likely to occur. Most rapists are cowards, and if they know they'll be executed for raping women, they'll probably think twice about doing it. Of course, there will always exist those individuals with a total disregard for the law or the consequences of their actions, and they will rape woman. But if you put them to death, they'll never do it again. When you consider that many rapists have multiple victims, you'll understand that executing rapists the first time they're caught can prevent a lot of unnecessary pain.