Even His Birth Is Obama's Own Fault

Even His Birth Is Obama's Own Fault

This is the show from Thursday July 30th, 2009.

BEST QUOTE OF THE SHOW:

At FOX News Tommy De Seno says, "Obama, you could end all this [controversy over your place of birth] by just releasing the original document but for some inexplicable reason he refuses, and the love-struck media has never asked him why.

Click to expand...

SUMMARY:

* The Biggest Non-Story Story in the Country: The three main leaders keeping the heat on Obama to produce his birth certificate are Alan Keyes, Joseph Farah, and Lou Dobbs. Recently CNN's Lou Dobbs said that Obama should just produce his birth certificate.

Today’s Resource: Enjoy listening to Bob Enyart’s Bible study on miracles and healing titled Details Galore! Did you realize that men often react negatively to displays of God’s power? The ten plagues in Egypt, the forty years of miracles in the wilderness, and Christ’s wonders in Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum all left onlookers in a state of unbelief. Bob's study on CD, Details Galore, analyzes the scriptural material on this aspect of human behavior by evaluating every single miracle listed in the Bible! Also, you can read this same analysis in Bob’s life’s work, the best-selling book, The Plot!

Even if he was born in Kenya, his mother was a US citizen therefore he's a natural born citizen. McCain was born in Panama but he is still considered a natural born citizen for the same reason.

oops

oops

Pan Dulche, boy, do you have that wrong.

Pan Dulche said:

Even if he was born in Kenya, his mother was a US citizen therefore he's a natural born citizen. McCain was born in Panama but he is still considered a natural born citizen for the same reason.

Click to expand...

I could see how you might guess this. But you've guessed wrongly. Just Google the matter.

-Bob Enyart
KGOV.com

Well it seems what I said was inaccurate, but still, the law says that "a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S" is a U.S. citizen. How do you know that Obama wasn't born before then? How do you know Obama wasn't born in Hawaii? How do you know that his father wasn't really a U.S. citizen? How do you know that the year of Christ's birth wasn't inaccurately recorded and we aren't actually in the year 1935 right now? In the end we really only have testimonies and documents, and both of those point to Obama being a natural born citizen. I think targeting the legitimacy of Obama's citizenship because his father was African stinks of racism. His life is what it is; I don't see how he would be any different based on what side of an artificial, arbitrary border he was born.

Roger Calero of the Socialist Workers' Party was on the ballot in my state and he was born in Nicaragua to Nicaraguan presidents. Obviously if people who aren't natural born citizens are permitted to run for president it's possible the country could elect an immigrant president. Do you really expect the judicial branch to lead a coup against a democratically elected president based just on where he may or may not have been born?

Pan Dulche said:

Well it seems what I said was inaccurate, but still, the law says that "a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S" is a U.S. citizen. How do you know that Obama wasn't born before then? How do you know Obama wasn't born in Hawaii? How do you know that his father wasn't really a U.S. citizen? How do you know that the year of Christ's birth wasn't inaccurately recorded and we aren't actually in the year 1935 right now? In the end we really only have testimonies and documents, and both of those point to Obama being a natural born citizen. I think targeting the legitimacy of Obama's citizenship because his father was African stinks of racism. His life is what it is; I don't see how he would be any different based on what side of an artificial, arbitrary border he was born.

Roger Calero of the Socialist Workers' Party was on the ballot in my state and he was born in Nicaragua to Nicaraguan presidents. Obviously if people who aren't natural born citizens are permitted to run for president it's possible the country could elect an immigrant president. Do you really expect the judicial branch to lead a coup against a democratically elected president based just on where he may or may not have been born?

Click to expand...

Actually, yes I do. Well, it wouldn't be a coup. If Obama is not qualified to be President then he shouldn't be President. Do you not care what the U.S. Constitution says about the qualifications for a U.S. President? The problem is that the definition of the term "natural-born citizen" is a contentious issue. Also, those who believe that Obama was born in Kenya have yet to produce any evidence that Obama's mother was even in Kenya in August 1961. If she entered Kenya in July or August 1961 surely there are entry records. On the other hand why doesn't Obama just release the long form of his birth certificate and end all this debate?

That is why the Honduras court asked the military to obey the law. It wasn't a coup there, and it wouldn't be here. It would be the rule of law taking hold.

Besides, I hate his nazi guts.

The Berean said:

Actually, yes I do. Well, it wouldn't be a coup. If Obama is not qualified to be President then he shouldn't be President. Do you not care what the U.S. Constitution says about the qualifications for a U.S. President? The problem is that the definition of the term "natural-born citizen" is a contentious issue. Also, those who believe that Obama was born in Kenya have yet to produce any evidence that Obama's mother was even in Kenya in August 1961. If she entered Kenya in July or August 1961 surely there are entry records. On the other hand why doesn't Obama just release the long form of his birth certificate and end all this debate?

Click to expand...

No, I don't really care about what the U.S. Constitution says about the qualifications for a President. If people want a 30 year old president, or a president who happened to be born on the other side of a line, I think they should get it.

Even if Obama was born outside the U.S. after 1934 how does that make him any less "American" or any less qualified to be president? Are people born in 1933 somehow more American than people born in 1935? The law is completely arbitrary.

To go after Obama just for this is at best exploiting a meaningless, illogical, poorly defined law; at worst it is exploiting historical racist sentiment.

Nick M said:

That is why the Honduras court asked the military to obey the law. It wasn't a coup there, and it wouldn't be here. It would be the rule of law taking hold.

Besides, I hate his nazi guts.

Click to expand...

Is American law really infallible though? There have been all sorts of changes to the law. I mean, a few years ago Obama wouldn't be qualified to run for president because his father was black. Now he wouldn't be qualified to run for president because of where he and his father were born (if that were true, which it probably isn't anyways.) Is that really so different? Where a person is born and what they look like aren't things that they have any control over, so I don't see how that makes them somehow less qualified to be considered my equal. (Equal in the sense that we should both be eligible to run for president.)

Obama is a Nazi? When was the last time you heard him talking about the superiority of the "Aryan race?"

Maybe you could make an at least somewhat valid argument saying that he is some sort of corporate state fascist (for the same reasons as Reagan!), but really, a Nazi?

Hitler said:

Even if Obama was born outside the U.S. after 1934 how does that make him any less "American" or any less qualified to be president? Are people born in 1933 somehow more American than people born in 1935? The law is completely arbitrary.

Click to expand...

Only somebody who wants to break the law, or is in violation of it would say such an idiotic and immoral statement. Shame on you.

To go after Obama just for this is at best exploiting a meaningless, illogical, poorly defined law; at worst it is exploiting historical racist sentiment.

Click to expand...

The founding fathers did not agree. This is why Arnold can not be President(I wouldn't vote for that liberal either), he was made a citizen through a legal process. That is what natural born isn't. Obama had to be made a citizen. He is not eligible to be President, for the intrest of not letting Nazi's put up their candidate for the office. That defeats the purpose of breaking away from Europe, Great Britain, and their socialism.

Is American law really infallible though? There have been all sorts of changes to the law. I mean, a few years ago Obama wouldn't be qualified to run for president because his father was black.

Click to expand...

So we should let Willie Horton over to your mother's house, since the law is infallable, and let him rape and murder your mother. Since the law doesn't matter anyway. You are really stupid, aren't you.

Now he wouldn't be qualified to run for president because of where he and his father were born (if that were true, which it probably isn't anyways.)

Click to expand...

No, he isn't. Nor would his father be, it is the law. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

Where a person is born and what they look like aren't things that they have any control over, so I don't see how that makes them somehow less qualified to be considered my equal.

Click to expand...

Where they are born matters, what they look like does not. Well, what a person looks like matters to liberals. Most are documented racists, they see through a race filter.

Obama is a Nazi?

Click to expand...

You obviously have no idea what a Nazi or National Socialist is. Learn a little bit about the subject before you continue.

When was the last time you heard him talking about the superiority of the "Aryan race?"

Click to expand...

National socalisim has nothing to do with race.

Maybe you could make an at least somewhat valid argument saying that he is some sort of corporate state fascist (for the same reasons as Reagan!), but really, a Nazi?

Click to expand...

You don't have a clue. Rep for general stupidity.

The founding fathers did not agree. This is why Arnold can not be President(I wouldn't vote for that liberal either), he was made a citizen through a legal process. That is what natural born isn't. Obama had to be made a citizen. He is not eligible to be President, for the intrest of not letting Nazi's put up their candidate for the office. That defeats the purpose of breaking away from Europe, Great Britain, and their socialism.

Click to expand...

So the British Empire was socialist? You are an idiot. Western Europe is 100% capitalist. Having a welfare system within capitalism doesn't make it socialist. Private property is still in the hands of a ruling capitalist class and used to make a profit from the labor of workers.

So we should let Willie Horton over to your mother's house, since the law is infallable, and let him rape and murder your mother. Since the law doesn't matter anyway. You are really stupid, aren't you.

No, he isn't. Nor would his father be, it is the law. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

Click to expand...

You seem to be suggesting that the law is always right. It was illegal for a black man and a white woman to marry in 1965 Alabama, obviously that matters. But the part that matters is smashing the law, not being a little nitpicking racist who follows everything by the books just because it's "the law."

Where they are born matters, what they look like does not. Well, what a person looks like matters to liberals. Most are documented racists, they see through a race filter.

Click to expand...

Where they are born and what they look like are equally out of a person's control. Where a person is born can also indicate to some degree what a person will look like, as "nations" (or ethnic groups, races, what have you) are defined in part by their common ancestral home to a "national" geographical territory.

You obviously have no idea what a Nazi or National Socialist is. Learn a little bit about the subject before you continue.

National socalisim has nothing to do with race.

You don't have a clue. Rep for general stupidity.

Click to expand...

Honestly...
Nazism is a type of corporatist (capitalist) authoritarianism. The term "Nazi" has strong historical implications to the German National Socialist Workers Party and its anti-semitic, antiziganeur, German nationalist ideology ; it is ahistorical to just call any authoritarian capitalist a "Nazi." Nazism is not socialism. The Nazis chose to include the word socialist in their party name to make demagogic appeals to the German working class. They did not actually want to build socialism. Socialism is internationalist and egalitarian.

Birther's sound like Al Gore supporters whining about Florida

I want a recount!